A jail with a view proposed for Seattle's Beacon Hill

King County appears to favor a plan to move its juvenile detention facility to the landmark PacMed tower, former home of Amazon, in the south Seattle neighborhood. "Here we go again," says a neighborhood leader. "We're getting dumped on."

A view of the former PacMed hospital and Amazon.com headquarters from the Danny Woo International District Community Garden.

Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons

A view of the former PacMed hospital and Amazon.com headquarters from the Danny Woo International District Community Garden.

King County has a problem. Its Youth Services/Detention Center — a.k.a. “the juvenile jail” or simply “Juvie,” though it also contains courts and classrooms — is outdated, undersized, and generally grim. But the county has no money to replace it, and last fall voters roundly rejected a sales-tax increase that would have done so.

Wright Runstad & Company, the consummately well-connected Seattle developer, has a problem too. One of its signature properties, the former Public Health Service/Pacific Medical hospital on Beacon Hill, has been sitting empty since its main tenant, Amazon.com, moved to South Lake Union — leaving Wright Runstad to carry what The Seattle Times reports is more than $320,000 a month in lease and interest payments. And while the PacMed tower, a 1932-vintage Art Deco gem, is one of the most visible and spectacularly sited buildings in Seattle, its isolation from downtown, the dismal property market, and a glut of office vacancies make finding another top-flight corporate tenant a long shot.

But a solution beckons to both their problems: to move the detention center, which is south of Seattle University, to the Beacon Hill tower, replacing view offices with cells and courtrooms. The county and the developer alike refuse to answer questions about the plan because, as Wright Runstad President Greg Johnson says, “it’s an active procurement process.” But sources in the Beacon Hill neighborhood and in city and county government who’ve been observing that process say Wright Runstad seems on track to land the Juvie project.

If so, it’s on a fast track. Last February, King County facilities director Kathy Brown told a County Council committee that “several developers” had tendered unsolicited proposals for replacing the aging jail facility. This prompted the county to issue a request for qualifications — a streamlined version of a request for proposals — from interested developers. Six companies responded, several of them national firms with farflung operations: Jones Lang LaSalle, Lydig Construction, Panattoni + Lorig, Skanska USA, the Molasky Group, and Wright Runstad. Last week Brown told the council that her office had reviewed the bids, interviewed the bidders, and settled on a top choice — which was an “off-site proposal,” a description that fits Wright Runstad’s. Ordinarily, given the difficulties of siting facilities such as jails, agencies and developers would attempt to rebuild on the same site.

One of the other bidders, Lydig Construction, proposed not just to rebuild the current facilities but to develop the nine-acre site in stages into what Lydig project manager Ryan Healy calls “a King County supercomplex.” Lydig would save costs by merely renovating the current jail cells (“They’re in great shape”) and by consolidating a wide range of county services, currently scattered across “20 to 30 commercial sites,” into the new complex. After a few years, the county would net a “positive cash flow” from the consolidation. Lydig would finance the project cheaply with tax-exempt bonds and turn full ownership over to the county after 30 years. The Juvie site, at 12th Avenue and Alder Street in Squire Park, is in Healy’s view a rare resource the county should hold onto: “For the future 100 years there’s no other possibility to have such a large land mass so close to the downtown corridor.”

It’s a complex and intriguing plan; Healy says he heard from one of the other bidders that the county rated Lydig’s proposal second or third out of six. “The only thing I would hope they would do is have an interview process where we could explain the intricacies,” he says. “They said they would do interviews in the RFP. But we have not been called for an interview,” contrary to what county facilities director Brown suggested to the council. (She did not return several calls for comment.) "We just heard nothing back," Healy says. "We sent in two emails and did not get a response except to say our proposal had been received.” Still, he says, he’s not complaining; he salutes the county for “opening the process up to ideas. I hope the King County taxpayers get a good plan.”

Brown said that the administration hoped to complete due diligence on the preferred bid by the end of August and, if it checks out, come back to the council with a concrete proposal. If not, said Brown, it would have to “do a more refined RFP process, which could take about three months.”

That’s just a snap of the fingers compared to the four years that Wright Runstad has spent seeking a new tenant, ever since Amazon signaled its intent to depart. At least one other prospect may still be in the picture: the Bellevue-based City University of Seattle, which, true to its name, has been trying to move to Seattle. “We have looked at their building, as well as a dozen other sites in Seattle,” says City University spokesperson Christopher Ross. “We’re not far enough along in any of our negotiations to comment.” Ross would not comment on a report that the school is locked into its Bellevue lease for another year. If so, that might leave a window for the county to conclude a deal quickly.

Already, the accelerated county process is stirring unhappy memories of the controversial dealings that gave Wright Runstad everything short of ownership — a 99-year lease with two 25-year extensions — at what was widely seen as a bargain price in 1998. As Casey Corr, now a Seattle U. official, reported in The Seattle Times, a host of leading political insiders — Gerry Johnson, Tom Byers, John Howell, Joel Horn, and Mayor Paul Schell — worked on behalf of the city, Wright Runstad, or the flailing Pacific Hospital Public Development Authority, the property’s owner, to pull it off. Connections to both the firm and PacMed ran deep in Schell’s administration. “The deal really smells, but I can’t get any hooks on it,” City Council member Nick Licata told Corr at the time.

Similar murmurs are starting to rise now — complete with a rumor that Wright Runstad has retained a ubiquitous hired political operative, ex-deputy mayor Tim Ceis. (Ceis and his partners in the CBE Associates consultancy did not return calls to check on this.) Wright Runstad, the private party in a string of public-private partnerships, continues to occupy a privileged position at the intersection between private development and local government. Its projects include Redmond City Hall, a 2009 addition to the county’s Harborview Hospital, the Washington State Employees Credit Union Building, the public-private World Trade Center Seattle, a new office complex at the State Capitol, the new Husky Stadium renovation, and, in partnership with the county, the Chinook Building and King Street Center.

But the climate at city hall has changed; Mayor Mike McGinn is not part of the same establishment as Schell. And moving the juvenile jail would require a zoning change or variance from the city. “The PacMed site is in a commercial zone, which prohibits jails,” says Bryan Stevens, a manager at the city Department of Planning and Development. The juvenile center “would not be permitted in the zone.”

Gaining permission would expose the project to what would doubtless be heated public comment. After discussing the project with Wright Runstad’s project manager, one prominent Beacon Hill activist, writer Craig Thompson, thinks “the juvenile justice center would be fine” in the neighborhood. The building, he notes, has been “fully technologically updated … . I imagine it can be secured.” And it “would probably be a better neighbor than Amazon, which was totally disengaged from the neighborhood.” The Amazonians, says Thompson, “didn’t come into our little business district,” and even preferred to walk their take-to-work dogs on the company lawn rather than in the adjacent dog park.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 9:46 a.m. Inappropriate

Charge parents for their kids' stay. Does that conform the juvy to the "commercial" zoning?

BlueLight

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 10:07 a.m. Inappropriate

That's a (Bebb &) Carl F. Gould (with John Graham, Sr., 1930-31)! The next year Bebb & Gould's (Gould's, really) Seattle Asian Art Museum was built. What a sad "repurposing." See T. William Booth and William H. Wilson, Carl F. Gould: A Life in Architecture and the Arts.

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 10:17 a.m. Inappropriate

Genius must result when (bureaucratic) need collides with (developer) desperation.

Surely the 'repurposing' of one of our most visible buildings can stimulate better community vision than labeling it The Beacon of Corrections.

That building was a monument to the U.S. Public Health Service, and served its original functions for all of four decades--from 1933 to 1971--before being vacated (even before patron saint Warren Magnuson left the Senate).

A bit of history, along with the seed of a Better Idea for the use of the building, is available from a local blogger:

"...in 1998 the PacMed Public Development Authority ignored community pleas to turn the building into an assisted-care facility for the elderly, and chose instead to turn it into commercial office space. By means of shady sweetheart dealing influenced by then-Mayor Paul Schell, the building was soon leased to the Seattle development company Wright Runstad for 99 years for the dirt-cheap price of $8 per square foot. Wright Runstad then rented the property to Amazon at market rates, making a handsome profit–as well as providing a grand example of the sorts of sordid histories that dwell in many of Seattle’s otherwise lovely landmarks."

(Find the full posting at http://radsearem.wordpress.com/2010/10/04/october-4-1971-beacon-hill-before-amazon/)

That the building was ever privatized is regrettable. That it should be returned to public use as a corrections facility is, however symbolically fitting, deplorable, and there have got to be better ways to make use of this magnificent campus.

Seneca

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 11:02 a.m. Inappropriate

Fitting that the building that was once was a cubical hell should now become a cell.

As an office building it's location was terrible.

GaryP

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 3:51 p.m. Inappropriate

The proposal is for the building to house just not a juvenile detention (jail) facility - for a relatively small population, but juvenile courts and maybe even family courts (child custody, adoptions, divorces, etc). Thousands of kids appear in juvenile court before a judge, only a handful are ever held in detention. The building will serve the entire county and the largest growth in juvenile offenders is from south King County.

Why would the County locate these services in a place that is even more difficult to access than the current location at 12th and Alder? Yes, it is visible from I-5 and downtown, but how easy is it to reach by car or much less by public transportation? Putting these services at this location doesn't appear to serve the public's interests. Though it obviously will be of great benefit to Wright-Runstad.

SteveC

Posted Fri, Aug 5, 6:06 p.m. Inappropriate

I liked it as an office building, GaryP:

1) Free parking
2) Great views
3) A park right across the street

Sure, the food options were limited, and it was not nearly as well served by public transportation as Union Station or the Columbia Center (or the Columbia Building, for that matter). But of all the Amazon buildings I worked in, it was my favorite.

I will admit, though, that when we did venture out for lunch, it was always north to Little Saigon, never south to Beacon Hill's business district.

Now, as for what's to be done with the building, it's a tough call. Wright-Runstad's lack of a tenant should not be the public's problem, as long as the PDA is getting paid. That having been said, leaving the building vacant serves no one. Yes, they would make great condos — a retirement home possibly? — but I rather do like the idea of returning the complex to public use. This may not be the right way to do it, though.

Posted Sat, Aug 6, 9:29 a.m. Inappropriate

There are a lot of other uses for this building that are more fitting for our neighborhood and consistent with the residential nature of our community. An educational facility would be fine and medical as well, but a jail is not what our neighborhood needs or values. If the facility gets rezoned for this use, we could get an adult facility in the future. Don't forget, the City is short on adult jail space right now. Don't let this happen to our wonderful residential neighborhood. The best use is one that Wright Runstad doesn't develop apparently: housing. Wouldn't you like to retire in this building? This is consistent with Beacon Tower use, and the surrounding multi-family.

I also love the look of this building and the grounds. What is it going to look like with barbed wire fence, grounds lighting and high security? This is a historic building with GOLD LEED standard for the remodel. Views, views, views. We are going to use it as a jail? Come on! Think long-term.

Finally, the narrow north-south corridor on 14th/15th is a topographical constraint that we have to think about. If it becomes a congested mess it makes it hard for everyone to live here. It also reduces emergency response times, especially through 12th and Jackson (to our hospitals). The City would have some major transportation work to do if this facility got built out as a jail. This is a small residential neighborhood perfect for high-density housing and inner city living. A major detention and court facility doesn't belong on Beacon Hill.

Frederica Merrell

FM

Posted Tue, Aug 9, 9:06 a.m. Inappropriate

I agree with Frederica. It should become a residential building. I could easily see it reverting to an old folks home. There is a pretty easy access park to the North East. It's not too far from Pill Hill. It's not flat however and very old people have trouble with hills. Still the grounds are pretty.

Still would need some more renovation as some of the offices have only windows up high along the ceiling. And the elevators are "creaky" and often go not where you want.

As for "free parking". It was paid parking with an Amazon Subsidy perhaps? No parking is "free".

GaryP

Posted Wed, Aug 10, 12:46 p.m. Inappropriate

Anyone who has seen the existing sad, gulag-like facility and understands what statement its state of neglect sends to the families who use it would have no problem envisioning that business being conducted in the Beacon Tower. The facility is not merely a jail for bad kids, it serves as host to many services. Family law shouldn't be conducted in a dump. Courts are places where peoples lives can be changed forever and our public buildings should reflect that positively.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »