Seattle: a tale of 2 economies

In a national economy that is barely growing, Seattle may help the U.S. avoid another round of recession. Even here, though, the areas of opportunity are pretty limited.

A factory floor at Boeing.

U.S. Government

A factory floor at Boeing.

It’s the economy, stupid.” That’s what many of us wanted to shout at Washington, D.C., during the recent debacle over the debt ceiling debate. It was a cruel joke for most people, especially those trying to cope with an economy that continues to sputter without creating anywhere near the number of jobs needed.

After one rating agency downgraded American debt, after a wild ride on the stock market the past week, after continued problems in Europe, there is little confidence that the economy will pick up any time soon. But is the economy headed for a double-dip recession? Probably not, and regions like the Greater Seattle area are a good reason why not.

There is little question the economy has stalled with gross domestic product showing very small gains over the past two quarters. The Bureau of Economic Analysis said real gross domestic product — the output of goods and services produced in the U.S. — increased at an annual rate of 1.3 percent in the second quarter and 0.4 percent (less than 1 percent) for the first half of the year.

Nationally, the employment report on Aug. 5 was viewed as fairly positive, with 117,000 jobs created. But that’s less than half the needed monthly total to even begin to make a dent in the overall situation. And 193,000 people left the labor force, meaning they have all but given up trying to find a job in the first place. Another measure of the economy, the list of announced layoffs tracked by the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, jumped sharply in July to a 16-month high of 66,414. The job cuts were up 60 percent from the previous month, when employers announced plans to shed 41,432 workers.

One of the measures of the economy that is gaining some visibility is what’s called the labor participation rate. It is the percentage of working-age persons in an economy who are employed or looking for a job. In July 2008, just before the Great Recession, the rate stood at 66 percent. Today it is at 63.9 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That means a lot of people have simply given up and now face one of the characteristics of the 1930s Depression – significant long-term unemployment and the realization that those workers “of a certain age” may never work again.

In the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue area, however, the economy does not “feel” quite so bad. The area continues to be a region that bucks the trend, at least partly. So, the Seattle area is on the list of metro areas with growing numbers of jobs, yet the region still has a relatively high level of unemployment. In June, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Dallas, Boston, Houston, and the Seattle area led among metropolitan areas reporting over-the-year increases in jobs. The unemployment rate in June for the Seattle-Bellevue-Everett area was 9.1 percent.

What does that mean? It is the likely emergence of two economies in the Seattle area. One economy, driven by high-tech and sophisticated manufacturing companies (Boeing, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and so forth) is doing just fine. The other economy, driven by traditional businesses and occupations (construction, retail, and traditional manufacturing) is either stuck at a low level or continuing to decline.

Aerospace jobs are up 6.8 percent (Boeing has added 6,600 jobs over the past year). Software publishing (Microsoft) jobs rose 4 percent. Construction jobs are down 3 percent. The impact of government budget cutting means government jobs are down 3 percent since June 2010.

Overall, the economy here is doing fairly well. The Seattle-Bellevue-Everett area “has continued to add jobs month over month throughout 2011. May 2011 proved the first month to show higher employment than had been measured one year prior and two years prior. June 2011 numbers showed a continued strengthening of this trend,” according to the state Department of Employment Security.

A Wednesday (Aug. 17) report from Employment Security reflects the growing trend of two economies. The report said the state added 5,700 jobs in July, but the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 9.3 percent. June’s unemployment rate was revised upward from an original estimate of 9.2 percent to 9.3 percent and job growth in June also was revised upward, from 3,600 to 4,700.

“When the unemployment rate refuses to budge, people tend to not notice that we’ve added jobs for 11 months straight,” said Dave Wallace, the acting chief economist for Employment Security.  “The job gains have been steady, but not enough to chip away at the unemployment rate.”

In Seattle, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rose to 8.9 percent from 8.8 percent in June.

Earlier in August, the forecast from the state Economic and Revenue Forecast Council said the outlook for the state had dimmed “as consumer confidence has plummeted in the wake of U.S. budget wrangling and renewed European sovereign debt fears.”

“Our guarded optimism about the second half prospects of the national economy has given way to a sinking feeling of pessimism,” the Council said. “The national economic outlook has weakened significantly since our last forecast. The European economy is in no better shape as its sovereign debt problems have now spread beyond Greece to Italy and Spain. To add to the mess, although Congress was able to lift the federal debt ceiling in time to avoid a default on U.S. Bonds, it was not timely enough to prevent a debt rating downgrade by Standard & Poor’s (S&P). Bond, equity and commodity markets are now all pointing to a sharp economic slowdown ahead. Consumer confidence is in the tank. The risk of the national economy slipping back into recession has increased significantly.

“The state, along with the nation, is now facing additional shocks. The resulting decline in consumer confidence is likely to slow growth in Washington in the second half of this year and has increased the risk of another recession in the state’s economy.”

Another usual source of at least some economic growth is population growth. But the state now is growing at a rate of just 0.64 percent from the state’s official 2010 census count.

This unexpected slowdown in population growth is due to the slower than expected economic recovery, which affects two components of population change: natural increase (the number of births minus deaths) and migration, according to OFM.

Migration to Washington, largely driven by economic opportunity, is a major component of the state’s growth. This year’s net migration is estimated at 6,600, the lowest level in more than two decades. Worker mobility remains low nationwide because of difficulties with both selling homes and finding work. Part of the overall decrease in migration is due to a decline in international migration, OFM said in a report on the forecast made in April.

Some final points to make:

  • Anyone who says they know what is going on in the stock market does not know what they are talking about. “If investors are not confused by the gyrations of financial markets, the television commentators, the newspaper writers, the speeches from politicians, and the interventions in the economy by government institutions, I would be amazed,” said Bob Ward, vice president-investments at Graham Ward Wedbush Securities here. “The world economies have devolved greatly from that we have experienced since WWII. We have not been here before.” At best the stock market is a leading indicator and as such it sees little growth in the next six months or so.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Aug 18, 7:47 a.m. Inappropriate

Mr. Dunphy knows much more about economics, business trends, statistics, etc. than grumpy old animalal but I do know a few basics. Number 1 is that apple and orange statistics are meaningless. North Dakota and other states have much lower unemployment rates than Washington. Number 2 is that the big boys named Starbucks, Microsoft, Boeing, Amazon, etc. somehow flourish while small business struggles in Washington. Why? Tax breaks? Number 3 is that the entire economy of the USA appears to be a hodge podge mixture of niche mini-economies and the 9.3 local and state unemployment rate deserves its own local demographic and business sector breakdown. The local area appears to love monopolies both public and private and loathes the little people.

animalal

Posted Thu, Aug 18, 9:01 a.m. Inappropriate

How can the labor force participation rate be lower now than at the Great Depression? Back then not very women worked but now they do. Is the 66% back then just the percentage of working age men who participated, and the 63.9% now the percentage of both men and women who participate - doesn't seem possible? Or is the 63.9% now just the percentage of men?

alisone

Posted Thu, Aug 18, 12:43 p.m. Inappropriate

My dear Stephen,

I was energized. I did not even touch those so called "Power" drinks, now being made very popular by the endorsements from Bulls, Oops, celebrities.

It was a pleasure reading your article. So educational. So dispassionate. So dull. So "also-ran."

Go for the jugular. Make noise. make readers squirm. Shout. Yell. Ring bell. Boo. Come out of the woodwork. Find words with vulgarity to throw me out of the ring. Spit. (Four letter-word-deleted).

Nothing personal. I aim high.

Critique is not a lesson. It is a sum of all parts. Your sum is less than 100%. maybe, 90@ common knowledge and 1% local wisdom. That leaves good 9% vacancy. Available for wise guys like, moi, to exploit.

Have a nice day. Remember to carry your umbrella, oops, raincoat and galoshes. Weather could be nasty. Just like in Washington, DC.

...and I am Sid Harth@mysistereileen.com

Posted Thu, Aug 18, 3:40 p.m. Inappropriate

There are indeed two economies in this area, and clearly the second economy is in dire need of assistance. Fortunately, there are actions that can be taken in the state, region, and local areas that will provide material assistance in both the short and long-term.

First, get workforce education and training better funded. Though it will not solve the unemployment problem, there are several skilled trades outside of construction which are in need of trained workers. So let's train them.

Second, connected to that, we need better funding for two-year degree community colleges. The fact is that there is a whole layer of smart, hard-working people out there who have no interest in going to college for four years to work in a white-collar career.

Third, we need mentoring for small businesses, especially those that make products and services that they wish to export, which can be very difficult. This is something that King County or the Port of Seattle can do, working in concert with larger exporters.

Fourth, we can start reforming our state tax code, including getting rid of our ridiculous B & O tax, and replacing it with a tax on net profits. Also close a lot of loopholes larger corporations enjoy which small businesses don't.

Fifth, we can stop spending so much on our criminal justice system, which only encounters people AFTER they are no longer productive, and then keeps that way by making them felons.

Lastly, and connected to that, we can encourage venture capital to fund cutting edge green technology start-ups, by giving them a tax break and providing those who do the opportunity to participate in public-private projects.

There are more to list, but enough said for now. EVERY state in the Union that was on the leading edge of the recession is attempting, and in some cases suceeding in re-inventing themselve economically. Seattle needs to get to work, NOW!
Fourth,

TomB

Posted Thu, Aug 18, 4:15 p.m. Inappropriate

If Europe crashes and it looks bad over there in the EuroZone, Microsoft, Amazon, and Boeing are all going to take one heck of a whack from their sales/profits.

Don't think this area is immune to the troubles of the world's economic troubles. We are way interlinked.

GaryP

Posted Sat, Aug 20, 5:05 a.m. Inappropriate

I don't have to read the article to know there are two economies.

One is government, the other is middle class.

My revenue is also governments revenue, this is where i see the problem.

Governments revenue is made up of taxes from the middle class, plain and simple. Won't be long before there is no middle class.

salmonjim

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »