Remembering 9-11, and its two kinds of fear
One reaction was life-giving and community-making. The other, which replaced that first fear, was suspicious and divisive.
Library of Congress
As we join with others this week in remembering that terrible day ten years ago and in reflecting on the years since, it occurs to me that there are two kinds of fear.
One kind of fear shatters illusions of control and leaves us frightfully, terribly open. We have no answers, only questions. The other kind of fear leads us to steel our selves against the world at its worst. We try desperately to recover our lost sense of control. We have answers but little or no room for questions.
In large measure the story of 9/11 and what followed is a story of these two fears.
As I think back to that bright blue-sky day in 2001, the first kind of fear — the one that tears us open and leaves us terribly vulnerable — came first. The second kind — our efforts to make ourselves secure in the face of all that threatens and frightens — would, in time, eclipse the first.
For a moment I want to recall and ponder the first days and that first response. For as terrible and as evil as the attacks of 9/11 were, there was something powerful, even life-giving, in those first days and weeks. People poured into churches and synagogues. Some gatherings were spontaneous, unplanned, without script or customary printed order. As days passed subsequent services were more planful, prayers less stammered and torn.
On that first Sunday following 9/11 every church was full of people who were empty. We had no answers. Only horror, grief, and questions. What has happened? Why? What does it mean? How could this happen? Why do they hate us? Where’s God? What will happen now? What are we to think? What are we to do?
And there was in our terrible emptiness and vulnerability an openness that was somehow holy. For once, the ancient words of Scripture seemed neither distant nor veiled but immediate and transparent. Hymns and prayers ground smooth by familiarity were newly strong and resonant.
And people turned to one another. On streets and buses, in offices and coffee shops, we spoke to each other. We talked to complete strangers as if we were fellow pilgrims on a strange, common journey. People sought the company of others whether at Seattle Center, in lecture halls or in places of worship. Parents held their children and whispered that most amazing thing parents say, “It’s going to be all right.”
In those first days, we felt the full fragility of our lives. That’s a hard thing to feel, but not always a bad thing to feel.
In time, the second fear mostly replaced the first. Security systems were hastily installed as airports cautiously re-opened. We learned to be suspicious of unattended baggage and unknown people. We practiced a new language of red, orange, and yellow alerts, of TSA and Homeland Security. Slogans appeared, “If you see something, say something.” More and different types of security were added in airports and we took off our shoes because we were on unholy ground. Boats armed with mounted machine guns bounced beside our ferries in Puget Sound.
If such precautions were necessary, and at least some were, they came at a cost. A more fearful, more suspicious, and a more anxious America.
Further signs of the ascendency of the second fear: leaders sorted the chaos into “for us” and “against us.” Preachers of a particular stripe had answers. It was punishment for sin, the sins of those people. And the military mobilized for war amid threats of “shock and awe” to be visited upon the enemy. The second fear replaced and eclipsed the first.
But something had been lost as this happened, as the first fear gave way to the second. Is “community” too weak a word for what we lost? “Vulnerability?” “Humanity?”
As the second fear tightened its grip in the years after 9/11, the gap between the rich and the rest widened to a gulf. In 2008, the Recession came, further eroding our sense of shared security and trust. The current politics of anger and polarization are the politics of a deeply fearful people.
Even so, the first fear had opened, for a time, a terrible and a holy place within us. That’s what I remember most.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Sep 8, 7:58 a.m. Inappropriate
Very true. I think you're describing two different ways of relating to fear, I think at some level it's a choice. The first takes enormous courage, and also I think some kind of faith--faith in other people, in oneself, in spiritual sources. The second is powerfully instinctive, and amounts to a rejection of the vulnerability of having one's survival depend on anyone or anything outside one's control--even if the control is more imaginary than real.
Posted Thu, Sep 8, 8:16 a.m. Inappropriate
> My 9/11 commemoration begins with the commemoration of the destabilization of Afghanistan by Carter/ Brzezinski in 1979 to get the Russian Bear to enter to be bloodied by the CIA - Reagan Casey - organized counter-insurgency by the world wide Mujahedin.
>
> Imagine a nation of 25 million being sacrificed to the whims of cold war ideology! Now if that is not a crime bordering on Auschwitz and the Vietnam War, on what order is it? And Ziggie is still proud of what he did!
> Imagine letting the Mujahedin then dangle in the wind of their own devices after they had done the job of inflicting huge losses on the stupid Russian bear? Thus vengeance continues to play out among the Geopolitical Monsters both big and small; and as Noam Chomsky noted the other day:
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/06-1
> "That Washington was bent on fulfilling bin Laden’s fervent wishes was evident at once. As discussed in my book 9-11, written shortly after those attacks occurred, anyone with knowledge of the region could recognize “that a massive assault on a Muslim population would be the answer to the prayers of bin Laden and his associates, and would lead the U.S. and its allies into a ‘diabolical trap,’ as the French foreign minister put it.”,,The senior CIA analyst responsible for tracking Osama bin Laden from 1996, Michael Scheuer, wrote shortly after that “bin Laden has been precise in telling America the reasons he is waging war on us. [He] is out to drastically alter U.S. and Western policies toward the Islamic world,” and largely succeeded: “U.S. forces and policies are completing the radicalization of the Islamic world, something Osama bin Laden has been trying to do with substantial but incomplete success since the early 1990s. As a result, I think it is fair to conclude that the United States of America remains bin Laden’s only indispensable ally.” And arguably remains so, even after his death."
>
> Not the sort of thing that is said to educate the mourners and traumatized in New York of course, not even by the Drone Master Nobel Peace Prize Winner, President Obama..
>
> http://www.facebook.com/mike.roloff1?ref=name
>
> http://summapolitico.blogspot.com/
Posted Fri, Sep 9, 1:26 p.m. Inappropriate
"Boats armed with mounted machine guns bounced beside our ferries in Puget Sound"
Are these stupid or what? Let's imagine that terrorists take over the ferry by driving on a truck load of explosives threatening to blow it up. What are these mini gun boats going to do? Strafe the ferry killing all of us passengers? Same for a hostage situation, just open fire on the control deck killing whoever is steering? Shoot at the propeller and rudder and hope that we stop? Run along side the ferry and jump aboard carrying that 50 cal machine gun? Oh wait, it's bolted to the mount and you can't shoot the dang thing from the hip anyway. And if the terrorists does blow up the ferry, these small mini gun boats will rescue maybe a dozen people.
I suppose they keep boats from approaching but if you look like you're fishing you just wait until you see a run without the gun boats and side up to the ferry and blow yourself up. There's no defense save mounting guns on the ferry. And if we have gun crews on the ferry, we'll need people to guard them least the terrorists take over the ferry kill the few gunners and now have a floating gun boat.
Homeland security has been mostly show and thunder and no security. We can just be thankful that the shoe bomber didn't try to hide the stuff in his underware.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.