Using arts to regenerate urban enclaves

A new NEA program is boosting this approach, working in many cities, of using locally generated, smaller-scale cultural enterprises to generate the best kind of urban rebirth.

Warren Street in Hudson, N.Y.

Flickr

Warren Street in Hudson, N.Y.

They finally got it! Bravo to National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landsman, his staff, and the consortium of government agencies, foundations, and corporations for their pledge to invest generously in locally-formed, modest-scale, cultural enterprises as generators of urban rebirth.

This group’s new program, ArtPlace, will distribute $11.5 million in grants and $12 million in loans to programs that integrate the arts into local efforts in transportation, housing, community development, and job creation. For decades, exactly these kinds of efforts have been a prime renewer of downtowns. Denver, Sante Fe, Portland, Pittsburgh, Chattanooga — name a reborn downtown district and you’ll find similar modest catalysts that added up to big change.

And this is not just about artists or even the arts as narrowly defined. It’s about the ancillary services and businesses that creative work attracts and, critically, it is about energizing an area so that all kinds of activities are attracted to locate there.

Consider the restoration of the 1855 Hudson Opera House in upstate New York in the 1990s. That once thriving manufacturing town was  dying a slow death. Stores were mostly empty along its main thoroughfare, Warren Street. Only a small supermarket, hardware, sports and drug store, a children’s clothing maker, one antique shop, and a few other businesses survived. This shrinking city of 6,700 lost 11 percent of it population since 1990

But Hudson had smartly left its urban fabric intact, ripe for regeneration. First came a pioneering restaurant, then the opera house and one art gallery. In short order, a concentration of antique shops transformed this waterfront city into a destination. Then came art galleries, more restaurants, a Pilates exercise studio, kitchenware, clothing, cosmetics. More diversification followed. The supermarket succumbed to competition from a nearby Walmart and other shopping centers, but new was added to old gradually. The Opera House is now a veritable cultural center. The few empty sites are being built upon even during the recession.

By contrast, consider Detroit. It has spent decades chasing the Sirens of flashy progress — notwithstanding the fact that no city has rebounded because of stadiums and casinos. But while none of the massive, publicly-financed big projects did anything for Detroit, some of the smaller ones bore fruit that are now about to be appropriately nurtured by the consortium’s support of the Woodward Corridor. Avalon Bakery, now known for its international breads, opened on Cass Avenue two blocks west of Woodward in the late 1990s, followed by an organic market, a local beer producer, restaurants, art galleries, and social service organizations — blossoming into the Cass Corridor.

This home-grown regeneration was fed by small investments and spread organically, aided by its proximity to Woodward Avenue with the potential of broad-based rebirth. Similar nodes of regeneration are occurring elsewhere. Small steps eventually add up to big change.

Something similar emerged in Salt Lake City following the first conversion of an empty industrial building into a live-work space for artists in the 1980s. More conversions, galleries, framers, accountants, a stained glass artist, a farmers’ market, a seamstress, non-profit organizations all followed in an unplanned way evolving into a highly popular neighborhood. Even a longstanding homeless shelter was absorbed in the mix. And when a community writing center opened next door, the homeless had a place to learn how to use a computer and create a resume. The neighborhood became a real destination, making feasible the light rail which now connects it to the downtown core.

These kind of catalytic efforts draw investment because they are part of the fabric of the city — strikingly more successful than some large cultural fortress accessible only by car. The regenerative momentum builds gradually. That’s how Manhattan's SoHo started, pioneered by artists, with no public investment, inspiring similar neighborhoods elsewhere.

This is about piecing back together the undervalued precincts of our downtowns. Local people must shape the reconnections. Without them, the result is form, not substance.

Editor's note: This story comes to Crosscut via Citiwire, which chronicles urban issues and success stories across America.


About the Author

Roberta Brandes Gratz is an urban critic and author of the recent "The Battle For Gotham: New York In the Shadow of Robert Moses and Jane Jacobs," (Nation Books, 2010).

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Sep 28, 6:59 a.m. Inappropriate

Nurturing the creative class is one of those things that many people feel is fluffy and pointless yet study after study and experiment after experiment have shown that it is a tried-and-true way to create jobs. Not jobs in the creation of the art per se, but as Ms. Brandes Gratz points out in supporting those creative enterprises. Lunch joints, cafes, art supplies (which involve everything from steel works and metallurgical engineering to information technology and computer hardware), galleries, sales taxes etc.), renovation contractors, etc. Then property values start increasing as people drawn to the creative class move in to be near the "scene." I wish more politicians, on the right and left but especially on the right, would embrace this as an established method for promoting economic revival, to say nothing of the value of the art itself. This is why smart arts funding makes terrific economic sense.

smacgry

Posted Wed, Sep 28, 8:18 a.m. Inappropriate

Gentrification and support for the arts are not the same thing. One frequently leads to the other and these days it is clear that one supports the arts in order to produce not art per se but rather gentrification. so in the end its the same thing; artists move on while boutiques move in. soho worked because of cheap loft rents but also cheap diners and cheap bars. take away the cheap bars and diners and bring in galleries you might end up with an arts district, lots of galleries and restaurants, but you will lose the artists. and so it goes.

chapala21

Posted Wed, Sep 28, 1:32 p.m. Inappropriate

Unless some new actual jobs are created that make something from other materials that add value, what is the point? Thing is artists do this, but it's not just government support for the arts, it has to be market based as well. When 400 families have all of the wealth, there is only so much art they are going to buy. You need functioning middle class to support a broad Urban art culture.

GaryP

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »