Seattle's entrepreneurial zest is unstoppable
The city has been reinventing itself for the past 100 years. Here's a look at some of the major transformations of the past 20 years, starting with Nirvana.
Lawrence W. Cheek
Editor's note: This story is an adaptation of a series of reports by the author on "Changing the Sound," which recently aired on KUOW Public Radio.
In the early autumn of 1991, Seattle was in the midst of reinventing itself. The band Nirvana had just released its first major label recording, "Nevermind." Jeff Bezos had not yet founded his e-tail giant, Amazon. Seattle natives Bill Gates and Paul Allen had taken their software company public five years earlier, and Microsoft was on its way to global computer domination. Meanwhile, East Coast transplant Howard Shultz was repositioning the artisan coffee-bean roasting company he and others had purchased in 1987 into an international chain of high-priced coffee shops.
Nirvana’s success, coupled with the hype generated by indie-label SubPop Records, initiated a flood of hipster tourists to the somewhat sodden City by the Sound. By 1996, Newsweek magazine featured a cover photograph of journalist Michael Kinsley, clad in a yellow slicker and clutching a salmon. Like thousands of other people, Kinsley was on his way to Seattle (where he was the founding editor of Microsoft's Slate.com). The title of that Newsweek story? "Seattle Reigns."
For longtime residents, Seattle may have always reigned, though just outside of the international spotlight. For more than half the 20th century, the city was defined by Boeing, founded by Bill Boeing, who moved to the Pacific Northwest in 1908 to manage a timber company. According to Lorraine McConaghy of Seattle’s Museum of History and Industry, Boeing first saw flight at the 1909 Alaska Yukon Pacific Exposition. “He thought he could build better planes. So he built one at the foot of Roanoke Street and launched it into the sky above Lake Union in 1916.” After that, the timber business was never going to satisfy him.
Building airplanes fit right in with Seattle’s rough-and-tumble frontier town image. McConaghy says from the time the first white settlers arrived on Alki Point in 1851, they envisioned a sturdy, industrial enclave here. City father David Denny, she stresses, didn’t plan on being a farmer. “He wanted a city of smokestacks, at the intersection of a transcontinental railroad and a transoceanic fleet of steamships,” McConaghy says. If David Denny could have imagined building airplanes, he might have added that to his list.
That’s the city Bill Boeing found when he moved here, a town where maritime and timber, coal mining and fishing had provided a tidy, sometimes lucrative living for its inhabitants. People moved here for the jobs, but also for the chance to reinvent themselves, in lovely natural surroundings.
By the 1950s, when Center for Wooden Boats founder Dick Wagner arrived here for a summer job, Seattle’s downtown core was hardly a metropolis. “First Avenue was a crumbling mess,” he remembers. “There were tattoo parlors and taverns alternating, and all the spaces in the buildings above them were empty. I thought people had left this part of the city in 1900 and never come back.”
It was a less than auspicious first impression. But a year after that summer job, Dick Wagner moved back to Seattle for good. He was impressed with the Northwest landscape, and the outdoor activities. More than that, Wagner loved what he saw as the positive, can-do spirit of the people he met in Seattle. “All of the people my age were either building a cabin in the mountains, or building an airplane in the backyard,” Wagner chuckles. “Everyone was a pioneer in those days.”
You could also say everybody was an entrepreneur. “There was a roll up your sleeves and get to it-ness,” historian McConaghy says. “It really informed Bill Boeing. Not just that he dreamed. He did it.”
Ninety five years after Bill Boeing tested his first biplane over Lake Union, that entreprenurial energy is alive and well here. But instead of a city of smokestacks and steamships perched on the edge of a continent, Seattle’s brawny image has been groomed into a more metrosexual look. The low-rise brick and terra cotta commercial buildings that used to dominate the downtown core have given way to a slew of sleek metal-and-glass buildings. Most of the surviving historical structures have been gussied up with power washes and interior redesigns.
On a sunny Thursday evening, almost 200 people are crowded into a large room on the second floor of one such reclaimed building in South Lake Union. This is Tom Douglas’ new Brave Horse Tavern. Most of the happy, chattering patrons work next door, at the new Amazon headquarters. Others are part of Seattle’s newest industry: biotechnology.
“Within this area, we’ve got the Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, the UW Medical School down the street.” Martin Simonetti is speaking in his office one block west of the Brave Horse, ticking off the life sciences businesses within walking distance. Simonetti heads a company called VLST, where scientists are researching treatments for autoimmune disorders.
Simonetti came to Seattle from California, when this city’s biotechnology industry was just revving up. He helped lead Dendreon’s development of the prostate cancer treatment Provenge. Simonetti stayed here, in part, because of the entreprenurial climate. “By far, Seattle is my favorite place, in part because of the people here,” he says. “They are very supportive, friendly, and they love to get things done, to be the first, to be new.”
It took more than a good attitude to propel Seattle’s biotech industry. When former mayor Greg Nickels took office in 2001, Seattle’s go-go dot com boom had collapsed. Nickels believed biotechnology had the potential to create jobs. He met with industry leaders and asked them what they needed from the city. The answer: an urban version of an industrial/research park, to be centered in the Cascade neighborhood just south of Lake Union.
In anticipation of the Commons, a grand park proposed to span the area from the lake into Seattle’s retail core, Paul Allen had amassed a significant real estate portfolio. After voters voted down the idea, twice, Allen sat on that property, waiting for the next big idea. Greg Nickels says the key to triggering neighborhood redevelopment was the city's public investment. “That’s why we had a streetcar,” he explains. “That’s why we invested in a park, and a playground nearby, why the Mercer Street transformation was so important.”
Not everyone shared Nickels’ belief in the transformation of Cascade into South Lake Union. John Fox, of the low income advocacy organization Seattle Displacement Coalition, argues it highlights the degree to which large economic interests can shape the character of the city’s existing neighborhoods. “To just view it as a tabula rasa, as an empty slate to be remade, that’s troubling to me,” says Fox, who questions a recent city-funded study of South Lake Union job creation, calling it overblown and exaggerated.
Like it or not, the transformation of South Lake Union isn’t that far out of character in a city that’s been a destination for pioneers since the Denny Party arrival 160 years ago. Historian McConaghy says there’s a self-selection process about the people who are here.
“I don’t think innovation and creativity are a thing of the past. It’s very much a thing of the present,” according to her. McConaghy says there’s always a new frontier to explore, whether it’s in space, rock music, or cancer treatment.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 9:41 a.m. Inappropriate
For a more in depth look at the reality of the new economy read SALON article Art in Crisis The Creative Class is a Lie by Scott Timberg. It's the last article offered in today's Crosscut.
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 10:09 a.m. Inappropriate
Glad that chapala21 noticed that article on our 'Clicker' headlines. Since those are regularly updated, the story has moved off the front page and you'd have to go to 'more' to find it. If it's easier, the direct url is:
http://entertainment.salon.com/2011/10/01/creative_class_is_a_lie/singleton/
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 11:24 a.m. Inappropriate
"The Creative Class is a Lie" ... what drivel trying to pass itself off as journalism, not a cited fact in sight, an attempt to link minimum wage jobs at Borders, Tower Records etc to knowledge workers jobs.
"American doesn't manufacture anything and never will again".. nice crystal ball you got there. Of course the Chinese economy could collapse from the real estate bubble there, The Euro is already on it's death bed, and people are finally realizing that Free Trade is just a treaty that is designed to offshore our jobs. These things aren't going to last. As the price of energy rises, the 10,000 mile global supply chain is going to get a lot shorter. And the peasants in China working for slave wages aren't going to keep that up much longer either.
On this article though, I do agree, Seattle does have a "can do it" attitude and that will help us face the changes coming.
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 11:51 a.m. Inappropriate
This article is so narrowly focussed on capitalistic ventures it makes my head hurt. What about the science and social entrepreneurs?
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 1:33 p.m. Inappropriate
"Allen sat on that property, waiting for the next big idea"...
And some grandiose idea it turned out to be! No one would ever have guessed that he would bulldoze the small buildings and erect new office space! OMG! it was brilliant and no one could ever have foreseen it! Such amazing insight, no wonder the guy is a billionaire. Probably only in Seattle could someone take land with water views and short buildings knock them over and build taller ones!
Which means, Cross cut needs new editors, or at least some editors so that articles like this can be "fixed" so that at least people can read them without choking on their lattes.
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 7:04 p.m. Inappropriate
@GaryP, articles like this are what happens when you try to produce a news (or in this case, "news") site without paid writers on staff...
Posted Tue, Oct 11, 7:16 p.m. Inappropriate
For a slightly different take on our "entrepreneurial zest," see this 2008 Crosscut article by David Brewster.
http://crosscut.com/2008/04/24/business/13690/What-made-the-Seattle-style-of-business-a-success/
Posted Thu, Oct 13, 11:18 a.m. Inappropriate
Over at The AVE I have written a very different view of both Seattle's history and the state of SLU. Here is the link: http://handbill.us/?p=10959
Some excerpts:
Marcie Sillam's desription of SLU is so far from the truth that it reads like a flack piece for Vulcan. She does not understand the amazing mix of cultures that created the atmosphere she sees as a soil for our current crop of corporations.
Her "history" of Seattle innovation left off:
Wobblies, the Long Shoreman's Union and Harry Bridges
Marc Tobey and the amazing artists of the NW school
Jimi Hendrix
Ed Krebs and Eddie Fisher, their Nobel led to a huge part of modern anti cancer therapy
Quncey Jones
Bill Holm, the "formline" ... the basis for the huge renaissance in art from our own
REI and The Mountaineers
Donald Thomas, Nobel for Bone Marrow transplant
Jacob Lawrence
UW Immunology faculty .. the founders of Immunex and Genetic Systems
Tom Hutchinson and Hal Weintraub, the Hutchinson Cancer Center
Lee Hood, the true father of the Human Genome Project
Chief Seattle, whose vision allowed Seattle to come to be.
Chief Leschi, brave leader of the effort to stop extermination of what came before.
Victor Steinbrueck and Pike Place Market
Washington's wine industry
I thiunk she is way from the truth in extolling VULCAN's original claim to be developin an urban biotech complex. The major driving force in SLU is not ... at least not yet ... biotech. Seattle ranks well below much more entrepreneurail places like the Bay Area, Southern California, Pennsylvania near U. Penn, and of course Boston. The founding companies for SLU, Rosetta and Zymogenetics, have now failed or shrunk. Immunex chose to build its campus outside of SLU and then sold itself, and that campus, to AMGEN. Most of today's biotech innovation is still occurring in Bothell and the Eastside.
I think this failure is in part because the SLU development has ignored traditional Seattle values. This city has never been about downtown. Seattle's innovators have worked from their homes, the UW campus, or neighboring ... more rural .. districts. As a resident of SLU, I note the absence of bars and bookshops. We do not even have a branch of the UW bookstore. The new restaurants, while great places to meet for a business lunch, do not offer the kind of casual atmosphere where creative people .. .. are likely to gather. Even the condoes sprouting up here lack public spaces that engender discussion.
The most visible effect of the SLU corporate atmosphere is that the art community has been driven out. The SLU gallery scene is anemic.
In sum it seems to me that SLU is a business district, an expansion of down town office space and Manhattan style housing that is quite unlike the odd Seattle mix Ms. Sillman extols.
Posted Thu, Oct 13, 4:25 p.m. Inappropriate
"I note the absence of bars and bookshops."
The Worlds biggest book shop, Amazon.com, is in SLU! Or do you mean like "Elliott Bay Books", but I can't remember a time when there was a decent book store down in SLU. Prior to the Vulcan development it was light industry. A fine place to work, but not that many folks who buy books there.
The BioTech's are out in Bothell because office space is cheaper.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.