Editor's note: This is an updated version of a story that Crosscut first reported Wednesday, Oct. 12, on questions about reproductive and other services at Swedish Health Services' facilities.

Swedish Health Services has announced it will help fund and support a new Planned Parenthood clinic adjacent to its hospital on First Hill, following protests over its plan to stop performing abortions at its facilities as part of its proposed affiliation with Catholic-based Providence Health & Services.

The plan is for Swedish to outsource to Planned Parenthood elective abortions and other reproductive health services that violate Catholic doctrine. But Swedish says it will continue to provide all necessary emergency services to pregnant women, including abortion if necessary.

“We feel good that reproductive services will be maintained and improved,” said Jennifer Allen, director of public policy for Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest. “We are specialists in this type of care and we’re delighted to partner with them in this way.” She added that Swedish has assured her organization that it will continue to terminate pregnancies in emergencies situations affecting the life or health of women.

"Swedish is deeply committed to ensuring women have access to comprehensive care," said Dr. Jane Ulhir, Swedish's medical director, in a written statement. "We chose Planned Parenthood because they are the experts in the efficient delivery of reproductive health care."

As Crosscut reported last week, a coalition of advocacy groups is raising questions about whether the newly proposed affiliation of Swedish and Providence will lead Swedish facilities to adopt Catholic policies that prohibit certain reproductive and end-of-life services for patients. The new arrangement with Planned Parenthood does not allay all of these groups’ concerns, however.

Robb Miller, executive director of Compassion & Choices of Washington, which supports patients in end-of-life choices including aid in dying under the state’s Death with Dignity law, said his group is working with Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union, NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, and Legal Voice to “investigate and try to mitigate the impact” of the proposed Swedish-Providence alliance.

Lauren Simonds, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Washington, said her organization is concerned about the potential impact of the hospital alliance on thousands of women who receive their reproductive care at Swedish facilities. “We don’t believe it’s appropriate for one religion to impose its beliefs on people who seek care at their hospitals,” she told Crosscut. “The whole community goes there, they provide a public service, and women’s health care should fully include reproductive health care. It shouldn’t be treated separately.”

Recently, Seattle-based Swedish — which runs five hospitals and numerous clinics in Seattle, Edmonds, and Issaquah and employs 800 physicians — and Renton-based Providence — with multiple hospitals and clinics in King, Snohomish, Thurston, and Lewis counties — announced they had signed a memorandum of understanding to form a joint entity and combine operations to improve services and reduce costs. Both systems recently reported budget shortfalls and layoffs. The proposed affiliation likely will face state and federal regulatory review, because the combined systems would control a large percentage of the Puget Sound-area hospital market and could limit competition and drive up prices.

While Swedish announced that it will remain secular after the affiliation, the advocacy groups appear to have a foundation for their concerns. Swedish announced it would stop providing elective abortions in its facilities once the affiliation with Providence is finalized. According to Swedish spokesman Ed Boyle, Swedish would assure access to comprehensive women’s reproductive services through other organizations.

But Miller and Simonds asked what would happen if pregnant women in Swedish facilities faced an emergency condition, such as an ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage, requiring an abortion or related procedure to save their life or protect their health. Last year, Bishop Thomas Olmsted expelled St. Joseph’s Hospital in Phoenix from the Catholic Church and excommunicated a nun, Sister Margaret Mary McBride, because they had approved terminating the pregnancy of a woman suffering from life-threatening pulmonary hypertension.

“Will [Swedish] ship a woman to an emergency room elsewhere if she’s bleeding to death from an ectopic pregnancy gone bad?” Miller asked. Before the announcement of the Planned Parenthood arrangement, Boyle said Swedish “will not provide elective abortions, but it will provide all emergency services required by women in an emergency situation.”

Boyle said Swedish facilities would continue to provide a full range of birth-control services, including tying the tubes of women who don’t want to or can’t safely bear any more children. He added, however, that those procedures “will be separately managed and governed.” While the details of that arrangement are still being worked out, he said, it likely will include a manager with responsibility for those services, reporting to a local Swedish board.

Another question is whether Swedish will change its approach to terminally ill patients considering ending their lives under the state’s Death with Dignity law. Catholic doctrine prohibits this practice.

Boyle said Swedish currently doesn’t directly participate in physician-assisted suicide. But its policy does allow Swedish physicians to decide individually whether to assist patients under the Death with Dignity law — though taking life-ending medications is not allowed in Swedish hospitals and Swedish pharmacies aren’t allowed to fill lethal prescriptions.

Miller said Swedish and its affiliated hospice and staff have supported patients who want to pursue the Death with Dignity option, typically referring them to Compassion & Choices for information and help. But he’s worried that Swedish will adopt Providence’s total prohibition on participating in aid in dying after the affiliation is finalized.

Providence Hospice of Seattle has a written policy barring its doctors, nurses, social workers, and other staff and volunteers from participating in any way in Death with Dignity activities. Providence hospice staff are not permitted to discuss with patients their options under the law or provide referrals for patients seeking information or assistance — except back to their attending physician. Any staffers who violate the policy are subject to sanctions.

“That’s unethical,” Miller said. “If a patient asks you to provide a legal procedure, you have an ethical duty to refer the patient. If Swedish Hospice is folded into the Providence Hospice, that would be a real step back, because Providence has the worst policies on Death with Dignity. They withhold information and undermine patient choice.”

A Providence spokeswoman referred all questions for this article to Swedish. Boyle said Swedish does not anticipate changes to its current Death with Dignity policies. But, he added, “we will be going through our policies to review them and make any adjustments in connection with the affiliation.”

There also are questions about whether Swedish would start following other religious and ethical directives issued by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. Those directives guide health care at the 27-hospital Providence system and at the more than 600 Catholic hospitals and hundreds of other Catholic health facilities across the country. The religious and ethical directives state that Catholic facilities do not have to comply with patient and family requests and patient advance directives that are “contrary to Catholic moral teaching.”

One directive requires Catholic facilities to provide tube feeding and hydration to patients in chronic, irreversible conditions such as persistent vegetative state. But many physicians, administrators, and ethicists, including those at Catholic facilities, say it’s wrong to require patients to receive this form of treatment, particularly if they had an advance directive saying they didn’t want it.