America's unlikely top city for biking: Minneapolis
The city has edged out Portland, long the leader, by focusing on building bike lanes separated from auto traffic. Such lanes bring more women and older folks into the cycling revolution.
Flickr
People across the country were surprised last year when Bicycling magazine named Minneapolis America’s “#1 Bike City,” beating out Portland, Oregon, which had claimed the honor for many years. Shock that a place in the heartland could outperform cities on the coasts was matched by widespread disbelief that biking was even possible in a state famous for its ferocious winters.
But this skepticism fades with a close look at the facts. Close to 4 percent of Minneapolis residents bike to work, according to census data. That’s an increase of almost 33 percent since 2007, and 500 percent since 1980. At least one-third of those commuters ride at least some days during the winter, according to federally funded research conducted by Bike Walk Twin Cities. Even on the coldest days about one-fifth are out on their bikes.
Minneapolis also launched the first large-scale bikesharing sytem in U.S. — called Nice Ride — and boasts arguably the nation’s finest network of off-street bicycle trails. It was chosen as one of four pilot projects for the federal Non-Motorized Transportation Program, which aims to shift a share of commuters out of cars and onto bikes or foot.
“Biking has become a huge part of what we are,” Mayor RT Rybak declared to a delegation of transportation leaders from Pittsburgh and Columbus, Ohio, on a Minneapolis tour sponsored by the Bikes Belong Foundation. “It’s an economical way to get around town, and many times it’s the fastest. I frequently take a bike from city hall across downtown to meetings.”
This year the city is adding 57 new miles of bikeways to the 127 miles already built. An additional 183 miles are planned over the next 20 years.
In a city where bicyclists of all ages and backgrounds already ride recreational trails the goal is to encourage people to hop on their bikes for commuting or short trips. This is not a far-fetched dream, since nationally half of all automobile trips are three miles or less — a distance easily covered on bike in 20 minutes.
To make that happen, Minneapolis is committed to creating separate rights-of-way for bikes wherever feasible. That factor helps explain why the city defies trends of bicyclists as overwhelmingly male. While only a quarter of riders are women nationally, the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey reports 37 percent in Minneapolis.
Research shows that most people — including many women, families, and older citizens — are wary of biking alongside motor vehicles on busy streets. Having the option to ride apart from heavy traffic encourages more people to try out biking as a form of transportation.
Since the 1970s Dutch planners have separated bicyclists from motor vehicles on most arterial streets, with impressive results. Women now make up 55 percent of two-wheel traffic and citizens over 55 ride in numbers slightly higher than the national average. The Dutch also found that as the number of riders rises, their safety increases. Shaun Murphy of the Minneapolis Public Works Department, notes the same phenomenon — your chances of being in a car/bike crash in the city are 75 percent less than in 1993.
Mayor Rybak stressed that in these lean economic times, cities across the country need to be creative about how they spend transportation dollars. Big-ticket road engineering projects to move ever more cars must give way to more efficient projects that move people by a variety of means — including foot, bike, transit. “We need to get more use from all the streets we already have,” Rybak said.
Bike projects in the Twin Cities are not limited to Minneapolis. St. Paul and many suburbs are also making it easier for people to travel on two wheels and two feet. Steve Elkins, Transportation Chair of the Metropolitan Council, a government body that guides development throughout the region, highlighted his efforts as city council member in suburban Bloomington (home of the Mall of America) to push the idea of Complete Streets — meaning that roadways should serve walkers and bikers as well as cars. (There’s a Complete Streets national network and advocacy organization.)
Elkins also extolled the virtue of road diets, conversion of four-way streets into three-way configurations with alternating center turn lanes — which create opportunities to add bike lanes or widen sidewalks without diminishing capacity for cars. “When done in the course of regular road repair projects, they cost nothing more than what it takes for a community outreach campaign,” he noted.
One theme recurring through the entire tour was that better bike facilities benefit not just bicyclists, but everyone. Bike lanes improve safety for motorists too, by slowing the speed of traffic. Mayor Rybak noted, “we’ve found they’re the best traffic calming device around.”
And at a time when gasoline prices are high and transit service is being cut across the country, bikes can help fill the transportation gaps in poor communities and among young people. The option to commute and do errands on bike make it easier for many families to get along with one car, with happy results for the household budget.
Minneapolis was not always a great biking town. I live here, and would have howled with laughter 25 years ago if you told me Minneapolis would one day be named America’s best bike city 30 years ago. It was a frustrating, uncomfortable, and dangerous place to bike.
What changed in Minneapolis was that local bike riders patiently lobbied for better conditions, slowly winning over elected officials and city staff. Also, as the number of bike riders steadily rose, motorists became accustomed to sharing the streets with us.
Other factors that boosted Minneapolis as a bike town include:
- Minneapolis was originally laid out for streetcars — like most cities outside the Sun Belt — which is a scale that works very well for bike riders.
- The high number of recreational bike riders here eventually translates into bike commuters.
- As a Mid-American city far from the glamor capitals of the coasts, biking has become part of our positive self-image. Even people who haven’t rode a bike in years cheered when Minneapolis was named America’s number-one biking city.
This story comes to Crosscut via Citiwire, a news service about urbanism and regionalism.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Sat, Oct 29, 12:12 p.m. Inappropriate
I wonder how the winter biking rates compare between Minneapolis and Portland?
It may be true that "Close to 4 percent of Minneapolis residents bike to work, according to census data.", but does that apply for those weeks between November to March if there's snow on the ground in the Twin Cities? If approx. 1% of the residents are biking to work when there's snow and ice on the ground, that would be hugely impressive. ("Even on the coldest days" could mean really cold but dry, which might be somewhat better than "cold and really rainy" for bike riding.) I wonder if they plow and de-ice the off-street trails - that would definitely show commitment.
Posted Sun, Oct 30, 8:37 p.m. Inappropriate
Compared to most people's impressions, the Twin Cities has less snow and ice on the roadways than you would think. Three reasons. They plow agressively and de-ice roads and sidewalks. In the winter, the humidity is often quite low, unlike here in the NWest. So, when the sun comes out, as it often does, the snow and ice sublimate, especially later in the winter when surfaces can heat up during the daylight hours.
Also, the dryness means that it's not nearly as cold as the thermometer might suggest, and we shouldn't over look the fact that Minnesotans simply dress appropriately. There's no such thing as bad weather, just bad clothing.
Posted Mon, Oct 31, 9:04 a.m. Inappropriate
Whenever an article like this comes up, I can't help thinking about how it might apply to Seattle. So I'll ask the big question: What is the topography of Minneapolis like? Is it hilly like Seattle, or flat like--say--Amsterdam? I think the 'lay of the land' is the most important factor in determining whether bicycling can become a widespread mode of transportation, used by people of all ages, and regardless of any athletic proclivities or predilections among said riders. (And for this reason I cannot see Seattle ever becoming a 'bicyle town.')
Posted Mon, Oct 31, 10:34 a.m. Inappropriate
Portland, west hills aside, is flat as a pancake, so is Minneapolis. Seattle doesn't have a single block thats flat.
Posted Mon, Oct 31, 2:41 p.m. Inappropriate
As a lifetime (and current) resident of the Minneapolis area and avid cyclist.. I was forwarded this article by a friend who lives in Seattle.
I'll answer the questions and speculations in order..
Yes, people bike here no matter how horrendous the weather is. I'm actually sort of surprised the number is as low as they show. I've seen office mates riding in on days with 6-12" of new snow, or a fresh coat of ice.. or spring slop.. or whatever amazing conditions the Minnesota climate throws us.
How is that possible? Like another poster suggested - it's about the gear. It's about layers for warmth as well as wind and moisture blocking. The bike is also critical - nobody rides carbon fiber road bikes in the snow. Surly Pugsleys are pretty common, as are 'ATV-looking' creations with big knobby tires, fat disk brakes, and special cabling to resist rust & gunk.
Roads do absolutely dry out if it's been a while since the last snow - partially due to aggressive plowing and partially due to TONS of salt thrown down. Roads have a pretty good white crust of dry salt on them by the end of the winter.
The first thing to get plowed in town are the bike paths - I've seen perfectly plowed bike paths in the midst of a 2 foot blizzard where no cars are going - but guys on Surly Pugsleys are making 8-10mph with a huge grin on their face.
Minneapolis is pretty darn flat but not totally flat. The trails, being mostly ex-railbeds, are totally flat. As you get near either the Minnesota River (on the south side of the Metro) or near the Mississippi (goes right through St. Paul), the hills get big and the bluffs get steep. The bluffs in downtown St. Paul are 2-300 feet and can be as steep as 18% Yes, really. On average though, a 30-mile cruise around the city will rack up about 750-1000 feet of climb depending on where in the city you ride.
The public bike system, as mentioned in the article, is a wonder. There is a kiosk with 6-24 bikes (depending on location) about every three blocks in a 3 mile radius from the city center. In the city center - you could really ride a rented bike from wherever you were to wherever you are going and expect to find a checkout/checkin kiosk near you.
Small wonder Minneapolis finishes high on the list of healthiest cities on a regular basis!
I gotta admit, I'd be less excited about it if I lived in Seattle..
Posted Tue, Nov 1, 10:42 p.m. Inappropriate
Portland is certainly NOT flat as a pancake. Dismissing the west hills is silly, since this is a key area of town and lies in the middle of the metropolitan area, separating downtown from the entire west side with steep hills and curvy, dangerous roads. Downtown itself is quite hilly, though not as much as Seattle. The east side of Portland is basically one big slope rising up from the river toward the Cascades, dotted with bluffs, buttes, ravines, and an inactive volcano. Some north-south routes on the east side are somewhat level, but other than those specific routes, you aren't going anywhere without elevation change. In that regard Portland is certainly nothing like Amsterdam or Minneapolis. Minneapolis is blessed with both flatness and separated paths.
Posted Wed, Nov 2, 4:35 p.m. Inappropriate
In Seattle, the hills and the rain is not a problem for most of us. When you first start riding you walk then ride then walk the hills. After about a month you'll ride it all the way to the top. A month later and you'll remember walking that hill but you'll never do it again.
The biggest issue for commuter is safe location to store a bike all day everyday. (the regularity of it makes it an easy target) A shower and a place to hang your clothes to dry/air out. Which is not your typical gym locker.
And a safe way to get from A to B. There are a lot of connected side streets thanks to the city's grid pattern but there are some work locations which require travel on major arterials and then you are in a heap of trouble. But it's getting better, note the increased counts of riders.
Posted Wed, Nov 2, 5:03 p.m. Inappropriate
If by "us" you mean the approximately 3% of Seattle residents who commute by bike, I'd say that's self-evident.
If you're talking about everyone else, however....
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.