Occupy Seattle creates real change in local government
Occupy Seattle has been harshly criticized by the media as dirty and politically ineffective, but one Occupy Seattle activist points to a growing list of the group's political victories.
f8stop via Flickr
Editor's note: Author and activist Mark Taylor-Canfield appeared on Crosscut's recent City Hall panel about Occupy Seattle and Occupy Wall Street. He is a member of the Occupy Seattle Media Working Group.
Since the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations began in New York City a few months ago, local and national news media have continually criticized the movement, reporting that the occupation groups are disorganized and politically ineffective. KIRO radio personality Dori Monson recently described the Occupy Seattle protesters as “filthy rats.” Monson suggested that the president of Seattle Central Community College, Paul Kilpatrick, should call in “exterminators” to get rid of the demonstrators. This kind of inflammatory rhetoric delivered by a few local radio shock jocks during the last week has left many participants at Occupy Seattle feeling frustrated and a little bit concerned for their own safety.
But despite these claims by some very conservative commentators, Occupy Seattle has already had a direct influence on the folks at City Hall. The political implications of Occupy Seattle’s interactions with local governments are hotly debated by most media pundits, but if the occupations, marches, and protests organized over the last two months are any indication of future events, Occupy Seattle will surely be a factor in local politics for at least one more election season.
Occupy Seattle’s campaign to boycott Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo has already had an effect on the local economy. Boeing Employees Credit Union reported that 699 new customers opened accounts on Nov. 5 — “Bank Transfer Day.” Last year on a comparable Saturday — Nov. 6 — they had 166 new accounts.
The Occupy Seattle group’s interactions with city government began in a series of failed negotiations involving Mayor Mike McGinn. In a public statement on the city website, McGinn expressed his support for the occupiers. Still the mayor ‘s offer to invite the protesters to City Hall was not well received by the majority of Occupy Seattle participants, who were unhappy that the offer required tents be taken down each morning by 7 am and included an outright ban on protest rallies at City Hall. Even so, a small group of campers did move there. Tensions escalated during the month of October, eventually leading to confrontations with police and parks department rangers, who repeatedly tried to kick the group out of Westlake Park.
It remains to be seen whether McGinn’s passive aggressive approach to the OS group will cost him votes if he chooses to run for re-election. Political observers in the Occupy Seattle camp have commented on the fact that the majority of city residents who voted for McGinn also express support for the nation-wide Occupy Wall Street movement. They suggest that the mayor’s decision to allow the Seattle Police Department to arrest and harass protesters could come back to haunt him during his next election campaign.
After their encampment moved to Seattle Central Community College, Occupy Seattle had time to regroup. Now they are organizing activism inside the city government. On Nov. 5 Seattle City Councilmember Mike O’Brien joined the demonstrators in their declaration of independence from large corporate banks, when he publicly withdrew his own personal funds from Wells Fargo.
In fact, the only official “demand” that the Occupy Seattle general assembly has ever actually endorsed (and sustained) — bank divestment — has now taken the form of a resolution before the Seattle City Council. It calls upon the city to consider withdrawing the public’s money from banks that received government bailouts — Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Chase. According to the group’s demand, the city’s money must be re-invested in small locally owned banks and credit unions, thereby keeping the money in the local economy, rather than sending it to Wall Street.
Council member Nick Licata introduced the resolution before the Seattle City Council on Nov. 14, and it passed unanimously. “It wasn’t easy,” he said. “It was difficult for us to convince one of the council members who didn’t understand why we should support Occupy Seattle. But after a lot of discussions, we finally got the votes.”
Members of the Occupy Seattle working group on home foreclosures have been organizing weekly pickets at the King County administration building where homes are being auctioned. These activists have been lobbying both the King County Council and the Attorney General’s office, calling for local governments to offer some financial relief to the homeowners.
Still, Occupy Seattle hasn't limited itself to initiatives directed at city and county governments. Linda Boyd and other occupation participants are organizing a campaign to support Washington State Representative Bob Hasagawa’s bill to establish a publicly owned state bank. Boyd’s optimism about their potential for political victory is contagious.
“If Bob Hasagawa wants to propose this kind of legislation, we can help him organize support for his bill. I’m talking with folks from Occupy Seattle and we’re forming a working group to research and promote this idea of a publicly owned Washington state bank. We want to get the Seattle city council to endorse the proposal, and we want to lobby the state legislature to pass Bob’s bill.”
She added enthusiastically, “Yes, I know we are just beginning to organize this movement, but I think we’re making a good start!”
In addition to their support of Hasagawa, Occupy Seattle is planning to join forces with dozens of other community organizations to “occupy the state capitol” in Olympia on Nov. 28. Their aim is to stop some of the drastic state budget cuts to health, welfare, and education. They are demanding that the state legislature close substantial tax loopholes for corporations and for the wealthiest residents of Washington State to provide revenue for some of these programs.
A coalition of progressive tax reform groups and labor unions have suggested that a significant portion of the state budget deficit could be eliminated simply by reforming the state tax code. Organizations calling for tax reform as a way of providing new revenue include local SEIU chapters, members of AARP, the Community Health Network, the Statewide Poverty Action Network, and the Our Economic Future Coalition.
But despite political pressure exerted by the ”Occupy Washington” group during a five day sit-in at the state capitol in April, state legislators have so far refused to consider their demand for tax reform during the upcoming special session.
Regardless of what local news media is reporting, the evidence shows that Occupy Seattle is gaining influence inside local government. And Occupy Seattle participants say they plan to continue these lobbying efforts, to pressure their elected officials to do the right thing.
In spite of strong criticism regarding their lack of political organization, a few of the Occupy Seattle activists seem dedicated to the idea of pushing for political and legislative programs that directly address economic injustice in their own neighborhoods, and in communities throughout the state.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 6:10 a.m. Inappropriate
"Occupy Seattle creates real change in local government"
Yep. I bet one of those changes will be in the Mayor's office.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 7:57 a.m. Inappropriate
Centers For Disease Control and National Institute for Health, and various local public health agencies have been given new laboratories for research and study of infectuous diseases sprouting up among the occcupy sites. Riot control exercises have been good training opportunities for local police departments and overtime pay is a kind of pre-Christmas bonus. Lemonade can truly be made from the lemons and lemmings that have squatted and camped out. It's a win-win-win. And, in contrast, the Tea Party movement appears patriotic, focused, disciplined, successful, policy driven, and far superior to the occupiers.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 9:20 a.m. Inappropriate
McGinn is done regardless of his relationship with Occupy.
The movement for a State Bank has been around since 2008.
I'll give you the move to get Seattle to change accounts to a local bank, though that has also been proposed before.
If you want to have an impact, decide you're for something and advocate for it. You've had two months to do something and certainly the political momentum to back it. Being "against stuff" is easy, but ultimately useless.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 9:26 a.m. Inappropriate
The Occupy supporters need to understand that they will be trashed by everyone with a stake in the status quo -- not just the usual right-wing media hacks. In order to survive, they will be forced to focus on clearly stated public goals. Vague goals allow their detractors to emphasize style over substance: hygiene, scruffiness, disorganization, etc. It's an image-based form of class warfare -- the poor should be kept down because they look and act poor. The Occupy movement opponents will always prefer to emphasize superficial appearances; they do not want to engage in a serious discussion about what is fundamentally wrong with contemporary American society.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 9:35 a.m. Inappropriate
"...they do not want to engage in a serious discussion about what is fundamentally wrong with contemporary American society."
I think what is fundamentally wrong with contemporary America is the way our elected officials pander to special-interest groups. Like Occupy Wall Street.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 10:14 a.m. Inappropriate
The President of this State Bank said his bank is the depository for all state taxes and fees and that that would be the hardest thing to wrestle away from the private sector. Bidding for public funds.
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2009/03/how-nation%E2%80%99s-only-state-owned-bank-became-envy-wall-street
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 10:47 a.m. Inappropriate
The second thing a state bank could do is make loans to municipalities. That would provide an alternative to the bond market for raising money and all the interest on the money would stay in the state. I'd expect a fight by bond salesmen as well.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 10:49 a.m. Inappropriate
Woofer:
Yes and no. Remembering the 60s, you can be sure that no matter how focused or clear any movement's message is, those with a vested interest in the status quo will always call them "just a bunch of dirty hippies." Which in some ways is quite telling since it clearly shows that to that segment of society life is just one long culture war against the barbarians at the gates.
I'm not sure that Washington law will allow deposit of public monies in credit unions. Last spring during yet another budget crisis meeting of the County Commissioners where I live we proposed this, since the credit unions are not only more financially sound but pay better interest. We were told that Washington law did not allow this. If true, this is certainly a prime pressure point for change. Take our money back from the Wall Street gamblers!
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 12:20 p.m. Inappropriate
I applaud the energy of Occupy Seattle's organizers and their efforts to support what's already in motion. The resolution to move city monies to local banks is brilliant and the Occupy Seattle campaign to make it happen shows the phenomenal leap forward we are taking because of Occupy.
Similarly, the State Bank already has a lot of supporters. Let's give a shout out to the people who did all the research leading up to the resolution ... http://wapublicbankproject.org/
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 1:14 p.m. Inappropriate
These protesters have been occupying Seattle for decades. That they have influence in city government is as much of a revelation as discovering that the Mormons have influence in Salt Lake City.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 1:18 p.m. Inappropriate
On the OWS here's a way better analysis.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-i-stopped-worrying-and-learned-to-love-the-ows-protests-20111110
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 1:25 p.m. Inappropriate
For what it's worth, like a lot of folks, I ended up banking with Chase because they took over WaMu where I had an account.
A few months ago, in a hurry at a gas station, I mistakenly used my debit card thinking it was my credit card of the same color. On auto pilot I just plugged in the PIN. Anyway I ended up overdrawing two checks for a charge of around $70--as I recall. Yes it was my fault, but still it pissed me off. I could understand $20 or $30 but no way did it cost Chase $70 to cover those overdrafts. I had that account for years with three direct deposits going into it every month; they knew they were at no risk to lose any money.
I'm now with BECU. It was a bit of a hassle to change my three direct deposits to there but I'm glad that I did. The service is excellent. I conduct 99% of my banking online, have set up all my bills to be paid through their payment option and now must only write one check a month.And I don't have to watch them constantly to make sure they are not coming at me from a new direction to squeeze new fees from me.
And you folks demeaning the occupy movement. Why don't you turn off your TV and go to the encampment and hang out and chat and observe for awhile? You might learn something. these people care a hell of a lot more about your welfare than some corporate stooge like Dorrie Monson.
Posted Thu, Nov 17, 5:14 p.m. Inappropriate
I can't believe that Occupy Seattle is taking credit for the surge in accounts at BECU. Did they not notice that Bank of America announced that they were going to start charging customers $5/month for customer's debit cards? Do you think this might have had an impact on the customers movement to credit unions?
Also, they are celebrating a win with the City Council resolution. Well, that resolution was the most vague statement I have seen in a long time, with a lot of "Consider" and "Evaluate" language. They did not commit to doing anything. It was pure political speak.
If Occupy Seattle (or any other city) wants to get support out of the real 99%, they need to get specific on what they are protesting against and then take some specific actions. Having a camp-out and SCCC is not enough.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.