Penn State: Facing the lessons for all of us

After the disillusionment, what do we do? That's what matters.

Led by Nebraska assistant coach Ron Brown, Penn State and Nebraska players gather in prayer for child-abuse victims

BSD/Mike Pettigano

Led by Nebraska assistant coach Ron Brown, Penn State and Nebraska players gather in prayer for child-abuse victims

The awful Penn State story of child sex-abuse left many of us numb initially. But as we come to grips with the betrayals, there are lots of lessons to be be learned. Here are five that I am pondering.

  1. While individual perpetrators bear primary responsibility, systems are complicit. In instances of wrong-doing like this the focus falls on an individual, in this case former coach Jerry Sandusky. But someone like Sandusky has been tolerated, enabled, and even protected by an entire social system, in this case the complex and far-reaching system of Penn State athletics.

  2. This is not to say that everyone who is in any way part of Penn State athletics is at fault or to blame. I’m sure there were many associated with the school’s sports program who truly didn’t know anything of Sandusky’s abuse but now find themselves both appalled and tainted. They too are, in some sense, victims. But many who had the power to make a difference did know something wasn’t right and looked the other way, or simply failed to pay sufficient attention.

    This kind of tacit tolerance and support for wrong-doing while common to cases of sexual abuse is not limited to them. It occurs when power is abused and misused in other ways as well. When bullies are allowed free rein whether on a playground or in an office, or when bad actors are not held accountable for their actions in a family or on Wall Street, a system is complicit. While Sandusky and others will be tried on criminal charges, the systems, the groups and institutions of which he was a part, need to take a hard look at themselves. In a real sense, and as Christian faith teaches, all of us need to take such a hard look at ourselves for our own part in the evils we deplore.

  3. Sports is overated in American culture generally and for kids particularly. I like sports. I played on teams in high school and college and occasionally as an adult. They have their place, but in American society today the place and importance of sports has become too big, much too big.

  4. When journalist and Kennedy biographer, Chris Matthews, spoke in Seattle a week ago he argued that JFK was actually fortunate to be a sickly kid. This was a blessing-in-disguise, according to Matthews, because Kennedy was unable to play sports and instead became a reader. As a child and youth, Kennedy read widely and deeply, developing his base of knowledge and capacity to think. As an aside, Matthews commented, “Sports for kids is overrated.”

    The importance of sports for kids is of course a reflection of the larger society (see point 1.) and of who and what gets the spotlight and money. But sports has taken on a value and importance in our society and in the lives of children that is seldom examined or questioned. Certainly there is a place for physical development and skills, and there are important lessons to be learned from being part of a team. But sports is one aspect of life, not life itself. Intellectual, social, artistic, spiritual and moral development are at least as important, and really more so. An old saw warns against “majoring in the minors.” Sports is a minor not a major. That it has taken on such great importance is one sign that our priorities are out of joint.

  5. Great longevity in positions of great power is dangerous. Joe Paterno had been at the helm of Penn State football for a long time, too long. He was surrounded by coaches who also enjoyed long tenures. While there is something to be said for long service and continuity, there is also such a thing as “too long.”

  6. Many argued last week that Paterno’s power at Penn State was far greater than that of his boss on the org chart, the Athletic Director, and greater even than that of the University President or its Board of Trustees. I don’t doubt it for a minute. While not all of that accrued power was due to longevity (see points 1 and 2), the years had something to do with it.

    The overall longevity of Paterno and his staff meant that there wasn’t enough new blood in the system and there weren’t enough fresh eyes on the program and its operations. Longevity often means that personalities trump norms and standards.

    For much of my life I was the pastor of religious congregations. In one of my longer tenured positions, I realized at one point and to my horror that I could say, “This is the way we do it here,” and get away with it. At that point, I got out. That kind of power is dangerous. It is also comforting. It allows people to not think or ask questions. Organizations where the same people have been in power for a long time tend to become ingrown and inhospitable to new people and ideas.

  7. Family is an overused metaphor. All sorts of clubs, churches, and even businesses speak of themselves, these days, as “families.” When I changed banks recently I was welcomed to my new bank’s “family of satisfied customers.” I imagine Penn State used similar language to speak of itself and its athletic programs, welcoming students to “the Penn State family.”

  8. When groups talk this way they are trying to say that they affirm strong ties and care about individuals; that they are like a family. The trouble with that comparison is that nothing is like a family, not really. There’s an old expression, “You can choose your friends, but not your family.” When “family” is applied to things that aren’t family we get confused about the nature of the relationship and our responsibilities.

    Cate Barron editor at the Patriot-News, a newspaper covering Central Pennslyvania, and one that has conducted a five-year court battle to get Joe Paterno’s salary figure made public, commented, "When you go to Penn State, you are in their family, and it’s this very intense thing, partly because it’s so isolated.”

  9. Disillusionment is a tough thing, but not the worst thing that can happen to you. I imagine that a lot of people these days are feeling disillusioned and sad about Penn State, its football program and Joe Paterno. We all get disillusioned at times and with different people and things. Sometimes we make “disillusionment” an excuse. “I’m disillusioned, so I don’t vote.” “I am disillusioned with the church, so I don’t go anymore.”

But to be “disillusioned” means trading your illusions for the truth, which may be a hard thing, but is never a bad thing. Joe Paterno is not God. Neither Penn State nor any other college or university is above reproach or question. Neither college football nor sports are the most important things in the world. These are illusions. You’re better off, we’re better off, without them. It’s what you do after you’ve been disillusioned that matters.


About the Author

Anthony B. (Tony) Robinson is President of Seattle-based Congregational Leadership Northwest. He speaks and writes, nationally and internationally, on religious life and leadership. He is the author of 10 books. Crosscut readers may particularly enjoy Common Grace (Sasquatch Books). His blog, "What's Tony Thinking?", is at his website, www.anthonybrobinson.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Nov 17, 12:33 p.m. Inappropriate

Like every other media notable who has commented on the Penn State sex atrocities, Rev. Robinson deftly avoids its most damning element -- that the depredations of the accused Penn State pedophile and the associated Penn State pedophilia protective cult are all examples of the class warfare that has become the defining characteristic of today's United States.

This is the disturbing lesson taught us by the fact the victims were all officially “disadvantaged” children – orphans, foster kids, juvenile delinquents -- in every instance those who had either been born into the nation's lowest under-caste or were placed there by the courts and/or the welfare bureaucracy.

These youngsters were thus definitively powerless – perfect prey for a pedophile and his protectors. As we are learning, the university authorities and even the local police would no more listen to the pleas of such children than the 16th Century Hungarian authorities would heed the cries of the distraught families of Countess Elizabeth Bathory's many victims.

Thus too the clandestine but now obvious function of The Second Mile – the nonprofit that claimed to protect and nurture these children – not as a sanctuary but as a pedophile slave-pen. Nor does such horror lack local precedent: the infamous O.K. Boys Ranch was similarly used to corral children for the pedophiles employed by the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.

In each instance, what we see are the consequences of the paradigm of governance that now afflicts the United States at every level: absolute power for the One Percent Ruling Class and its functionaries, total subjugation for all the rest of us, the 99 Percent.

Meanwhile the fact the outrages allegedly committed by the Penn State pedophile and his enablers are only now coming to light – years after these crimes were first reported – utterly invalidates the claim any genuine “justice” is available to such victims. Targeted specifically because they were amongst the most powerless members of the powerless 99 Percent, they were psychologically destroyed long ago.

Though the mental-health industry is loathe to admit it – like any capitalist enterprise its success depends on concealment of its failures – the hideous truth is that childhood damage of the magnitude inflicted via The Second Mile or the O.K. Boys Ranch can never be undone. The emotionally crippling wounds remain unhealed until the victim dies. Hence in any case of this sort the notion of “justice” is not only meaningless but absurd.

Posted Thu, Nov 17, 12:43 p.m. Inappropriate

I was thinking lately about the student protests that took place at Penn State after the scandal broke. That left me scratching my head. Do large numbers of students become so attached to their university brand name that any threat to the brand name will override any sense of reason? Perhaps the danger of emotional attachment to institutions could be an addition to the list of lessons.

There is an enormous amount of peer pressure in a university to be a part of the community and show the proper school spirit. I remember this as an undergrad, having attended a smaller school that had recently been put on the national map due to athletic success; although I had no interest in the outcome of the team, I felt compelled to feign interest. To be viewed as indifferent to the team is perhaps on the same level as being unpatriotic during wartime. The dangers of unrestrained jingoism are well known, see e.g. sedition acts, but the collegiate equivalent is generally viewed as harmless and good-natured. Perhaps it isn't.

Posted Thu, Nov 17, 10:39 p.m. Inappropriate

None of this was necessary to say, because it had all been said when the Catholic priest abuse first became public, which was a number of years ago. But I guess everyone who considers himself to be a writer figures he has to say it again, because if he doesn't, someone might think he's not against sexual abuse. (The use of "he" was deliberate; I haven't noticed any women writing such articles.)

sarah90

Posted Fri, Nov 18, 1:13 p.m. Inappropriate

Looks like it's not limited to just Penn State:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/18/us/new-york-syracuse-coach/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

GaryP

Posted Fri, Nov 18, 11:50 p.m. Inappropriate

I agree with all of the above except one benefit for sports: it teaches character, leadership, and most importantly grit. In a society where the cards are stacked to make everyone a winner it does the some good to loose once in awile.

Posted Sun, Nov 20, 9:40 a.m. Inappropriate

After reading the entire 23 page Grand Jury findings detailing the 8 male victims that Sandusky raped and abused, I have to say the only lessons for 'all of us' are that there is obviously a massive coverup going on at Penn State. There is no way 1 man could abuse so many victims without having other conspirators within the University system and the Police department.

The one thing that is very disappointing about this article is that it treats the whole subject of child abuse as some sort of shared crime and that 'the system' allows it to happen. The Grand Jury finding paints an entirely different picture. These crimes were reported multiple times to multiple people and nothing was done. This isn't a responsibility of 'the system'. It was a responsibility of the individual people who covered this up.

The assistant coach, Mike McQuery, reported this multiple times to several people in the University. He saw the rape of the 10-yo boy in the shower on a Friday evening, then he and his father met with Joe Paterno on Saturday. He also met with the Athletic director and the VP of Finance of the University. They are highly suspect since they both lied under oath to the Grand Jury.

DANIEL MENDELSOHN asks a very thought provoking question in the New York Times today. Would the attitude of the media be so nonchalant if this man raped a 10-yo girl in a University shower?

Secret Dread at Penn State
By DANIEL MENDELSOHN
Published: November 19, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/opinion/sunday/secret-dread-at-penn-state.html?_r=1&scp;=4&sq;=vigil&st;=cse

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »