Washington history: Boring no more
Seattle historian Lorraine McConaghy has written a new book that is not only a treasure trove of state history, but a tribute to the gold that can be mined in our archives.
Lorraine McConaghy is an author, friend, and colleague. She is also the public historian for Seattle's Museum of History and Industry, and has a wonderful new book out, New Land, North of the Columbia (Sasquatch Books, $40). McConaghy is a treasure of Northwest historians, and her book is a treasure trove, a must-read for anyone who wants an eclectic, entertaining survey of Washington state history. Not everyone does, but this book proves those who don't care are missing a lot.
McConaghy has her fingers in many historical pies. She's the face of local history at MOHAI and is playing a key role in the new exhibits that will anchor the new museum when it opens at South Lake Union in November, 2012. It's no easy feat to sketch out a new narrative for Seattle's history (Disclosure: I did a small amount of advising on that project a couple of years ago, which gave me a great chance to watch McConaghy at work.). She's also been very involved in the museum's project to collect oral histories.
She's lately made a study of Washington's connections to the Civil War for the current Sesquicentennial. She's been researching the antebellum influence on the U.S. Navy on the Pacific Coast, and in 2009 brought out Warship Under Sail (University of Washington Press, $34.95), her history of the Decatur, the naval vessel that bailed out the city during the first "battle of Seattle." It was not only solid maritime history, but fleshed out pioneer Seattle, making it seem more akin to Deadwood than the noble New York Alki.
All this to say that McConaghy is busy, dedicated, and intensely curious and productive. She digs, she thinks, she studies, she writes, she publishes. She also speaks. The official roll-out party for her new book in early December took place at MOHAI and after the 200-some guests sampled hand-picked local cheeses and wine, we retired to the auditorium, where McConaghy gave the first annual Denny Lecture, a new series devoted to our history from our best historians. McConaghy's focus was on her book, and what she's learned from writing it.
It was a labor of more than writing, however, and that's where to begin. McConaghy shares her love of research with the book's deceptively simple formula: find important documents in the state's history, reproduce them, and then explain what they mean, and why they are important. It's kind of like a scrapbook, or a well-ordered collage, but it goes deeper as Lorraine tells the back stories and fleshes out the context.
McConaghy traveled to archives all over the state to uncover gems. But she doesn't drive, so she traveled from Puget Sound to the Okanogan to the Palouse by Greyhound, Amtrak, local transit, and by bumming rides from friends. The results of her archival explorations are a delight.
We see, for example, Abraham Lincoln's handwritten response to having received the first telegraph message ever from the Washington Territory in September of 1864. There is a crudely written death threat to Seattle Mayor, Henry Yesler in 1885, telling him not to interfere with the ejection of the Chinese from the city: "I warn you to go slow Let the China biz alone for I got 25# of Dinemite." There's a hand-colored lantern slide showing the Great Seattle Fire. There's a telegram from James G. Blaine informing the governor that Washington became a state at "five o'clock and twenty seven minutes this afternoon," Nov. 11, 1889.
There's even a manifesto "Why I am a Klansman" from the page of Washington's Ku Klux Klan magazine, "Watcher on the Tower" from the 1920s. "The Klan is 100 percent for White Supremacy, Restricted Immigration, Protestantism, and Americanism," it declares. As McConaghy said in her lecture, there's no mistaking it for the Kiwanis Club.
The documents range in time from the beginning of the territory to the present day. There are gas rationing coupons from WWII, sketches of Depression-era hobos and New Deal Civilian Conservation Corps workers. There are photos of icons like the Twin Teepees restaurant, blueprints of a fallout shelter, the rough draft of Pulitzer Prize-winning poet Theodore Roethke's "The Rose," posters for rock concerts, radio transcriptions from the Forest Service on the day Mt. St. Helens blew, a sample of the weather-beaten 1992 log book that oxygen-starved climbers sign when they reach the summit of Mt. Rainier, a Windows 95 box.
McConaghy's big-picture takeaways from her research include a sense of our contradictions here in the Evergreen State. We're environmentally friendly, but have a deep history of resource exploitation and destruction. We embrace of diversity, but have abused minorities, from the original indigenous inhabitants to modern immigrants. We seem like peace-loving folk, but our state would not have developed without massive military and defense spending.
Washington may look settled on the map — a pretty state with a familiar shape — but it has been a rough, dynamic place with a human history that can hold its own with anyplace else. We brought the world Boeing, Hanford, Microsoft, but we're also a reflection of major, long-lasting conflicts and ambivalence. The book casts a wide net to capture this with telling documents and details.
New Land, North of the Columbia is also a tribute to the stuff of history itself, and it comes at a troubled time. With state budgets slashed and the Great Recession taking a toll, we are questioning our commitment to basic institutions. Funding has been slashed for schools, libraries, historical societies, archives, museums. McConaghy's book is a kind of banner to wave reminding us that much of our history, especially the documents that form the basis for how we know ourselves, are essential.
How can we make decisions without knowing who we are and where we come from? How can we gather facts when primary sources are lost, mildew, turn to dust?
"I am convinced that understanding the past makes the present make more sense than it would otherwise," says McConaghy, "and that when the present makes some sense, we can make better informed choices for the future. It’s not perfect and the variables are messy, but trying to make choices for the future when the present is an unknowable chaos and the past is a mystery, well, that’s just gambling. Museums, libraries, archives — these are secular places of absolute necessity in our society."
This is also a time when archives face technological changes. McConaghy's book celebrates physical objects in book form. The newspapers, drawings, photographs, postcards, letters, and ephemera she has gathered are wonderfully reproduced in color so you can read them and see the ink on paper, the folds, the stains. But they are not the documents themselves. Neither are digital files.
The state of Washington and other archives are working hard to get documents digitized for researchers and public access, a wonderful advance beyond card catalogs and microfilm. The digital archives of the historic Seattle Times (1900-1984) at the Seattle Public Library are an incredible new resource. But such advances should not replace preserving and studying original materials. The documents have their own clues to yield.
McConaghy gives an example: A copy of Gill's Chinook Dictionary she found at the Cowlitz County Historical Society. Chinook jargon was the trade patois locals used, made up of Indian, English, French. and other language influences. Widely used in the 19th century, it died out in the 20th. Yet this copy of the book from 1909 was well and long used by its owner. "The pages edges were stained in the middle where they were thumbed as the owner hunted for words and phrases," she writes. The book had also been repaired and rebound. It was clearly a workaday resource for years.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Dec 21, 8:49 a.m. Inappropriate
Looks like an amazing read! And thanks for the great reminders of the enormous lasting value of our museums, historical societies, archives ... and people who are skilled at interpreting our story.
Posted Wed, Dec 21, 10:14 a.m. Inappropriate
This is good stuff although there is not proper mention of the existing peoples in the introduction. The author takes a stance with the empirical side of the pioneers and settlers. I side with the Indians. Our plight must be properly mentioned when recounting history of this new nation:
"The early settlers took the land. The current resident people fought back. Through lies, gun fights, disease, and numbers these trusting people were defeated and forced onto reservations." Say something to that affect and present a more whole tale of the true history.
>Remembering the tragic and harmful invasion to this land, people, and animals is necessary to moving forward with dignity~
Posted Wed, Dec 21, 10:45 a.m. Inappropriate
"dare-to-be-dull era of (insert anything here) history" is what is taught in high schools. Which is really too bad, because real history is anything but. In fact I've given up reading novels because truth is stranger than fiction and I've yet to come close to reading all the history books that are on my list.
Derrick, if you want good books on native American history, you need to find native American authors who have transcribed oral histories.
example:
"The Journey of Crazy Horse : A Lakota History" by Joseph M. Marshall
It's not that white guys can't write about native American History, but that they often miss the whole story.
On the otherhand, Frances Parkman's book "The Oregon Trail" is pretty good because he actually lived with the tribes on the plains then wrote about it.
Posted Wed, Dec 21, 9:30 p.m. Inappropriate
I received the following reply to the above comments from Lorraine McConaghy:
Thank you so much for your comments; this is exactly what public history means to me: to engage in a conversation. As a historian, I have always begun any discussion of territorial history with the statement that this is Indian ground and water, and that is where New Land begins, too. The anthology includes the Point Elliott Treaty – at least, it includes significant excerpts from it – and characterizes it as the unequal bargain that it was. I do hope that Native people will be as thrilled as I with the newly-uncovered map of the area around Olympia, recorded in about 1920 with the last surviving Native speaker from the Medicine Creek treaty council – it is simply breathtaking. I tried hard in New Land to not leave Native people stuck back at treaty time – there is a great studio portrait of Dan Boone and his family, shot at Yakima, and a Chinook jargon dictionary from the Cowlitz County Historical Society, which clearly documents that Chinook was the common language between white employers and Native employees in the Kelso area as late as WWI. The Wold hops farm time book records the work of Native people in Issaquah in the 1890s, giving names, jobs and rates of pay. New Land sets out an interesting trio of letters from NARA, in 1915, that documents encounters between Mt. Rainier National Park rangers and a band of Yakama hunters – Chief Sluiskin was still alive! But, for me, the most poignant and powerful Image relating to Native history is a Seattle real estate marketing brochure illustration from 1902, that shows a Native man and woman – Suquamish or Duwamish - gazing across Elliott Bay at the tidelands, then being filled in and marketed for industrial construction. Yes, it is sentimental in the custom of the time, but it is also suggestive of the reality that Native people didn’t “go away,” but were ever present in the urban setting of Seattle.
New Land is an archival history, dependent on what has been and hasn’t been saved in a public archive. I hope that it is what I meant it to be: an homage to archivists and a wakeup call to the beauty and fragility of our shared archival heritage. We’re all in this together, for the long term. Just maybe, understanding the past will make the present make sense, and we can make better choices for our future. L
Posted Thu, Dec 22, 2:34 p.m. Inappropriate
Gary P. I think you're missing the point. I am not worrying about studying other materials at this point--I am looking at this one. Why do I feel like you are arguing a useless point? I see your profile and that you like to be opinionated. Maybe you are helpful in some areas, I don't know. Stay out of my way. Don't tell me what I "need." You see, I do not need to be pointed to other sources, I do not need your point-of-view. I am speaking up as a Salish person who survived the invasion. I am telling anyone who reads this that the author of the article did a great job except I'd like to see more truth in the intro. Is that concept understood?
Any thing I see that isn't showing the side of the invaded people's voice--I will add to it. It is nice that you start off saying history is bent at schools, that's true. Do you have a problem with me poking the author about this? They seem to accept it. Which is part of writing, getting feedback and even catching reader response.
So obviously this is a touchy subject. Perhaps it is better for non-Natives to stay silent or work hard to be neutral. I know it is difficult to communicate this way. But it is a perspective of mine that myself and my family members live / survive on conquered land. Buddy. And it is Your Job as someone who lives here to show utmost respect for the current conditions for All Citizens of our new, integrated country.
Don't argue with me, or you appear as a jackal. I am Native American and you are not? I am telling about our / my perspective and it is not arguable. I will point out a book for You to read--because I do not wish to write about this any more with you, and--because it is helpful with understanding and communicating with culturally diverse peoples: "WHITE PRIVILEGE" by Paula S. Rothenberg.
Show respect. That's my whole message.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.