Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Kurt Beattie and Eric Schlegel some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

When will insurers pay for alternative medicine?

With instances of painkiller dependency dotting Washington like a case of the chicken pox, when will health care insurers bend to demand for alternative pain treatment options? 


After reading recent media reports such as The Seattle Times series, “Methadone and the politics of pain,” I’ve been saddened to learn of the overwhelming number of Washington residents living in chronic pain and/or addicted to painkillers.  Also, the near universal frustration of both patients and providers for solutions is alarming.

I’m sure that all caring persons agree that no one should ever be left in agonizing pain, but is increasing dependence on painkillers the only answer?

Why is this largely an American problem?  With less than 5% of the world’s population, Americans consume 80% of painkillers sold. A recent comment on the Times website noted, “I just worked in Cuba. There (are) NO narcotics except for a couple of doses after major surgery. Tylenol is over the counter and ibuprofen by prescription. Somehow they manage and they have a lot less pain. Consider that paradox? They have no pain medicines and have less pain?"  

I’ve been encouraged to hear that some patients are managing to get off painkillers, including Cynthia Toussaint.  According to an ABC News report, she "was confined to her bed, writhing in pain from muscle spasms, unable to walk or to live a meaningful life.” Yet, ten years later, after turning to a variety of integrative medicine treatments, she resumed her singing career. Toussaint noted, "There's a whole range of under-appreciated non-traditional treatment options that are low-cost, effective, and with no side effects." 

A recent article in The St. Petersburg Times explains how addiction to prescription painkillers nearly killed ex-NFL star Randy Grimes. Yet, at a point that Grimes describes as “a spiritual moment,” he began to regain control of his life, found renewed purpose, and now works to help others to overcome the same addiction. Throughout my entire life, I’ve taken a spiritual approach to my own health and have experienced consistent, positive results.  

It’s also encouraging to read reports on therapeutic approaches that focus on thought and the mind in reducing pain. Studies at Stanford, Duke, and Wake Forest Universities have proven the effectiveness of many mind-body approaches in clinical trials.

One reason alternative therapies are not more commonly used by the public appears to be the lack of insurance coverage. According to The Seattle Times, Rep. Jim Moeller believes it is “unfortunate” that Medicaid covers narcotic painkillers, but not alternative treatments. However, there are signs this may be changing. A recent press release announced that, starting in July of 2012, the 13,000 employees of Maricopa County, AZ will have the option of an integrative approach “that embodies the philosophy and practice of healing oriented medicine, addressing mind, body, and spirit.” 

Specialists who work with patients dealing with pain have told me they support expanding health coverage to include alternative therapies that are less obtrusive and generally more affordable. 

On Dec. 16, the Obama administration surprised many by declaring that each state will now be allowed to have greater freedom in what their respective health exchanges will include. This may be a unique opportunity to include alternative treatments, especially the treatments that already qualify as medical expense deductions for federal income tax purposes. Including alternative therapies in health insurance will make them more accessible to patients, who may be struggling to find better ways to manage their pain.   

This article first appeared on Blogcritics.

A retired Seattle architect, Bill Scott writes about spirituality and health on Blogcritics.org and also serves as the Christian Science Committee on Publication for Washington state. His blog can be found at washingtoncommittee.com.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Dec 29, 6:58 p.m. Inappropriate

Insurers will pay for alternative care when alternative providers buy into scientific method. While some researchers (including the federal NIH) are separating the wheat from the chaff---locally, the Group Health Research Institute is finding that some alternative therapies are helpful in addressing lower back pain (I've personally participated in their studies on acupuncture and massage)---too many alternative providers are leftist versions of right-wing extremists who deny evolution and the human impact on global climate change. Just cruise the web and you'll find ideological naturos linking flu shots with Alzheimers. And how many still express skepticism about the thorough debunking of the research falsely linking autism to childhood immunizations?

How many times do you get the spiel at PCC from someone about how a certain food is organic, and therefore, it must be good? Or that a food is inherently better because it's sweetened with honey as opposed to refined sugar?

Just once, I'd like to see alternative providers dump a therapy that has been proven by a double-blind study not to work.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »