Where would Jesus bank?

A forum at the Episcopal cathedral in Seattle will look at the role of cooperatives in building a better future.

Michael Ramos of the Church Council of Greater Seattle and Alice Woldt of the Faith Action Network discuss withdrawals from the Bank of America.

Michael Ramos of the Church Council of Greater Seattle and Alice Woldt of the Faith Action Network discuss withdrawals from the Bank of America. Matt Fikse


Greg Rickel, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Olympia, has said on more than one occasion that Jesus hardly ever talked about sex, but talked a lot about money. Today’s Christian community struggles to address the problem of its own wealth in the context of global and local poverty. A forum at St. Mark's cathedral on Thursday called "Fixing the Future: How cooperative businesses are building a better world," will address the topic of how faith, mutual ownership, and micro lending can counter one of human kinds deepest afflictions: greed.

I've criticized the Occupy Wall Street movement because it has been short on solutions and long on angry anti-bank rhetoric. The "I'm the 99 percent" mantra doesn’t offer much of a positive economic or financial proposal to remedy the problems with our financial system. Some churches even took the step of marching downtown to Bank of America to make a big show of withdrawing their money.

The closest thing to a solution to come out of the OWS movement hasn’t been the church’s withdrawal of money, but figuring out what to do with it. Jesus confronted this topic with a parable in Luke about a farmer who fretted over where to keep all his wealth. After consulting an expert — himself — the farmer concluded the best thing to do would be to build a bigger place to store all that wealth. Satisfied with that plan he executed it, but God had other plans; the rich man died. You can't take it with you after all.

Darel Groathaus, who will moderate the forum at St. Mark’s, has lots of experience in the banking sector — but he’s also a graduate of the Divinity School at the University of Chicago. He was recently special assets administrator for Cascade Bank, managing a $60 million portfolio of troubled commercial real estate loans and a similar portfolio for Union Bank.

Groathaus has also spent a lot of time trying to understand wealth and greed in a biblical context as well as in a banking context. The passage in Luke has been of particular interest in his work and he has put together workshops on the topic.

Can cooperatives, like local giants REI and Group Health, cure the consuming greed that many faith traditions identify as a perennial human problem and Jesus calls out in the parable? Groathaus thinks they are part of the solution. "Mutual ownership can help answer the question of how we can create community wealth to benefit families and build up community institutions." Groathaus and others point to local examples like Boeing Employees Credit Union and PCC as financial organizations that are directed at people not profits.

But Groathaus agrees that people will always need to borrow, and the temptation of making riskier loans, which can generate more profits, will always be with us. It's easy to forget the savings and loan debacle of the late 1980s caused, in part, by deregulation that allowed them to act more like banks, provoking them to ignore their original constituency of small depositors and borrowers.

The problem any human economy faces is risk and how to manage it while still supporting the risk taking required for innovation or to help leverage people out of poverty. How does a person with sketchy credit but a great business idea get it to market? How does a poor family get their first mortgage? How can a person with no credit or bad credit build credit up? Often the answer is getting expensive loans from banks.

The fact is, banks and financial institutions of all kinds are an important innovation to meet those needs. Blowing up banks won't help the poor or disadvantaged. On the contrary, all human economies need institutions that are secure, regulated, and can provide needed capital at prices that allow them to be at least sustainable if not profitable.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Mar 28, 8:33 a.m. Inappropriate

Since I tell ya when I don't like it, I am compelled to tell ya that I really like this piece, Roger.

Interesting you have a Master's in religious studies. Would not have guessed that, and from UCSB, the premier party school yet!

Nice job. And nice to see you became a free-marketer, and suggest competition. And choices for the sheeple, which you normally are against, instead having nanny-state decide.

The Geezer

Geezer

Posted Wed, Mar 28, 9:09 a.m. Inappropriate

Why must people rely on commercial banks and not local credit unions for loans?
I am not clear on why such a timid comment that "credit unions might be better..." when it's the bankers' criminal greed, acts of fraud, and predatory lending that has caused the severe foreclosure crisis we're in. Best thing seems to be not doing business with people employed there, but where accountable human beings in the community, working for a mission explicitly serving members is far better for us all. An even better challenge is to voluntarily pool money and pledges of labor in groups you affiliate with (&/or neighbors) to work out mutual aid as needed. Get more creative than bank plans and programs. They shouldn't be entitled to control the mortgage business exclusively.

Posted Wed, Mar 28, 11:05 a.m. Inappropriate

Next up: Roger has been talking to God and blogging about it.

BlueLight

Posted Wed, Mar 28, 9:18 p.m. Inappropriate

Roger --

From whom should your developer friends borrow, if not from large banks?

Surely developers are well represented among the "1%" -- how should THEY combat their greed?

Preach ON!!!

simorgh

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »