The moral dilemma of a Seattle super chef

A visit to the ineffable Altura raises bigger questions about what it means to be both a lover of food and community and a successful chef.

Hand-made Altura pasta.

Altura

Hand-made Altura pasta.

The way it came about was this: An out of town friend called to ask a favor of me, which I gratefully performed; and he in gratitude returned the favor by sending me a gift certificate to dine at what is currently deemed Seattle's hottest — and reputedly most expensive— new restaurant: exactly the kind of place I never, ever go. (How impulsive a slug of free money can make even the most hidebound.)

I can't say that in retrospect I regret my decision: New knowledge is always good, even when it's purchased at a price. But along with some precious culinary memories and a gaping hole in my entertainment budget, my visit with friends to Altura, Nathan Lockwood's five-month-old artisanal-Italian restaurant on Capitol Hill, left me with a powerful sense of melancholy. How sad when the highest aspiration can lead an artist into an expressive dead end, into self-contradiction.

For Lockwood is unquestionably an artist. Not just in the presentation of his dishes — each a little ready-for-its-closeup culinary composition — but in the eye-appeal of each individual hand-crafted ingredient. Not even the unrelenting, uninterruptible descriptive babble of our server could blur the impact of their beauty — though it did allow them to get cold before our admiring eyes.

And when we were at last allowed to taste them undistracted, their mouth-feel proved as exquisite as their appearance. I will never forget Lockwood's version of a simple plate of housemade tagliatelle, dainty as tissue, topped with a dark, savory ragù of oxtail and tripe. It was, simultaneously, a flavor-texture synthesis of symphonic dimension and a Proustian madeleine, conjuring an illusory but vivid “memory” of mamma ladling the rich stew over vast plates of just-made noodles for the menfolk's dinner after a long sweaty day in the fields.

And (as quickly as a madeleine), in three bites it was gone. The psychic discord was almost physically wrenching. The taste: hearty, fragrant, appetite-stimulating; the portion: dainty-teacup-saucer in diameter, and less than that dainty-teacup-filling in size. The flavor grand and broad as a Sicilian landscape; the serving exquisite and puny as an ivory cameo. One whiff of sensory heaven and gone.

The whole meal was like that: whiff, wow, and basta; then, after a considerable wait, another whiff, again accompanied by interminable unasked-for information about the provenance of the ingredients and the intricacy of the preparation. Is this eating? Is it even dining? No, it's not; at best it's delectation, an utterly self-conscious ritual performance, with the food involved reduced to mere pretext. And it appears to be a wholly successful formula with the dining-out public.

How has this sad collision of sensory and cerebral values come to be considered not just an aspect but the norm of the high-end restaurant experience? When did the presentation of a dish and the tableware and the napery surrounding it become as important in a recipe illustration as the recipe itself, as meticulously credited as the accessories in a fashion shoot? Most crucially: Does a serious chef who is also ambitious have to sacrifice his or her deepest culinary values, his love of and respect for the deep authenticities of food as a public and communal sacrament, to the prissy, constipated conventions of haute cuisine?

I have no idea; and taking a final tab of nearly $400 for three as representative, I will have precious little occasion to garner more experience in seeking an answer. Not that I regret my Altura experience. On the contrary, it has inspired me to get out the pasta machine, purchase some tripe and oxtails, and start thinking about which wine's most likely to help me achieve a meaty madeleine of my own: one I can devour to my sweaty contadino heart's content.


Topics: Food

About the Author

Roger Downey is a Seattle writer interested in food, the arts, the sciences, and urban manners. He is currently working on a book about the birth of opera in 1630s Venice.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, May 1, 8:51 a.m. Inappropriate

Earlier this week, Rebekah Denn expressed the opinion that restaurants were over-coddling diners with "allergies." Now here's Roger Downey expressing doubt about restaurant food that's too good. (By the way, that's a great trifecta: "Whiff! Wow! Basta!") Can't wait to get to Altura myself (reservations for next week). Maybe I'll record the tableside spiel so I can play it back later to relive & retaste every exquisite bite.

Posted Tue, May 1, 10:35 a.m. Inappropriate

For about one third the price of what Downey reported, my 3 best restaurant meals in the last 10 years have been served and consumed at one Justus Drugstore in Smithville, Missouri, about 10 miles northeast of the Kansas City International Airport.

animalal

Posted Tue, May 1, 1:57 p.m. Inappropriate

Bravo, Roger:

It may be good, but $400.00? Feh!!

Grow your own, cook your own.

Angelo Pellegrini LIVES!!!

Ross Kane
Warm Beach

Ross

Posted Wed, May 2, 6:07 p.m. Inappropriate

Bravo, Ross

Pellegrini does indeed live on in our house, thanks to his last book.

afreeman

Posted Tue, May 1, 10:16 p.m. Inappropriate

Expensive tapas, prepared and served by a chef and a waiter who are clearly full of themselves...but do the diners become full? For $133.33 each, I would hope so. One of these days the local hipsters with more money than sense might figure out that fine dining is more than pretty nibbles served on nice china. Would anyone have to suffer through this kind of nonsense at Canlis, Rover's, Carmine's, Cafe Juanita, Nell's, etc. ? I don't think so. :-)

TaylorB1

Posted Wed, May 2, 7:48 a.m. Inappropriate

Actually, I've suffered exactly this kind of nonsense at Rover's, but not at Altura. Specifically, we were served left over turkey and cranberry sauce in a thimble, which was described gushingly as "game fowl with berry coulis" by the waiter, after which the infamous chef in the hat interrupted the conversation to stand awkwardly by the table for ten minutes, adding nothing whatsoever to our evening.

AselaG

Posted Tue, May 1, 10:39 p.m. Inappropriate

Altura is one of the very best new Seattle restaurants and a fantastic addition to Broadway.

Sounds like Roger went a little heavy on the wine.

I love the place and can't wait to go back.

Jan

Posted Wed, May 2, 7:41 a.m. Inappropriate

Having been fortunate enough to dine at Altura several times, and having left feeling fully sated each time, I have to wonder if Roger would have been happier dining at The Claim Jumper, or an all-u-can-eat trough...

AselaG

Posted Wed, May 2, 9:08 p.m. Inappropriate

While I generally dislike restaurants with extensive explanations, I fail to see how this is any kind of a moral dilemma for the chef.
He advertises the prices- $132 for the chef's tasting menu with wine pairings- right on his website, and then, if you choose to order it, you pay.

There are moral dilemmas involved in choosing quality food, and the concurrent high prices, over serving a wider range of diners- something that has been discussed quite well in recent issues of Lucky Peach, by Dave Chang and friends. But Roger doesnt really touch on that here.

My worst experiences with explanatory dining were at Herbfarm, where that lady in the Laura Ashley dress just would not shut up, dragging the meal out to 4 or 5 hours, which was particularly excruciating, given that the decor is reminiscent of a Cracker Barrel in the south, with rusty farm implements hung about and gingham lampshades illuminating the scene.
I appreciate the food, but could you just let me eat it in peace?

Ries

Posted Thu, May 3, 12:12 a.m. Inappropriate

Gack! I totally agree with the Herbfarm comment. What a royal pain that dinner was. I will never go back. I only partially appreciated the food, because the presentation was so annoying.

We ate at Herbfarm the first week of January on a particular major year for my partner. The little menu in the frame gift had the year date wrong. For that error alone, combined with the cost of the event meal, I would hold a grudge, but add to that the annoying bowing and scraping from the kitchen staff, nope, it is just not for me and mine.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »