Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to David Epstein and Elizabeth Pizac some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Public endangerment: How we threaten our own legacy

Washington's historic preservation challenges are often the result of public entities trying to bulldoze heritage. This year's "most endangered" list highlights the problem.

Washington's historic preservation challenges are often the result of public entities trying to bulldoze heritage. This year's "most endangered" list highlights the problem.

Every year for the last two decades, the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation has issued its "Most Endangered" list of historic structures. It's a useful exercise for raising public awareness before the wrecking ball has swung. The properties are nominated and their endangered status decided on an individual basis, but sometimes the list carries a general message.

Scanning 2012's listees, it's clear that while private development can pose a threat to historic properties — see the recent Capitol Hill outcry over the Bauhaus block and old homes being knocked down for apartments  —  the trouble is often caused by government, public entities, and public projects. There are many reasons for this. One is that such entities often believe that their will embodies an unquestioned public good, and the bulldozers should roll because they are serving a higher purpose. It's a kind of institutional arrogance that often loses sight of other values. Another problem is that sometimes government departments are simply overwhelmed by responsibility because they are underfunded by the public. They have a duty to protect historic properties under their care, but lack the means to do so.

That last point is made very clearly on this year's endangered list, which breaks a bit with its usual custom to generally designate the "Resources of Washington’s State Park System" as endangered, instead of a single property. But such trendspotting is useful. The parks system has more than 600 historic properties under its care, ranging from lighthouses to WPA picnic shelters. According to the Trust, state parks "is the single largest owner of historic buildings in the state. Recent economic woes, however, have made it increasingly challenging for the agency to sustain the needed level of maintenance at parks statewide, let alone address mounting capital needs."

Parks funding has been cut by two-thirds since the 2007-09 biennium. The parks budget is being slashed and off-loaded by the state legislature, sales of parks passes is coming in under projection. Washington is faced with converting to a pay-for-use system for parks (most states already do this). Like toll roads, it's a shift in public expectation. But the fact is, with staff and budget cuts, hundreds of historic buildings are threatened with neglect, deferred maintenance, increased vandalism and decay unless solutions to the state parks collapse are found.

Another endangered site: the King County-owned Harborview Hall, the fabulous Art Deco former nursing school on First Hill. Harborview Medical Center has a master plan which calls for knocking the building down for a plaza, but preservationists are fighting that and King County Executive Dow Constantine has rightly jumped in and asked for an assessment of redevelopment scenarios that save the historic structure.

Haborview Hall is not the only structure on the hill jeopardized by hospital development: a number of wonderful old apartment houses are at risk from Virginia-Mason's master plan process. They include The Baroness, the Cassel Crag, the Chasselton and the Rhododendron, which the Trust says "comprise a cluster of historic apartment buildings along Boren Street near Madison Avenue significant for their architectural styles and their association with multi-family residential development." Yes, single family dominant Seattle also has a wonderful multi-family housing tradition, of which these fine buildings are all a part and they add much to the heritage of what is one of the city's densest neighborhoods. Density advocates would be wise to get on the preservation bandwagon here, because the success of these buildings and their character could do much to sell the concept to a city that is skeptical.

The list also has an example of a historic hospital building threatened by a major public highway project: The Post Hospital at the Fort Vancouver National Historic Reserve. This wonderful old structure sits empty, right along I-5 and locals hope to convert it into an arts center. While it is not slated for demolition, the Columbia River Crossing project is slated to widen I-5 and would bring the freeway from the hospital's front yard to four-to-six feet from its doorstep. Noise, fumes, structural challenges would all worsen.

Yet another project on the list with a public threat: Washington State University's decision to sell the historic Jensen-Byrd warehouse in Spokane to a private developer that intends to destroy it. Local preservationists are fighting hard still for a last-minute reconsideration, the building is slated for demolition in 2013. The decision to destroy it qualified it for my Heritage Turkeys list, but a delay has offered a sliver of hope.

Other entities on the Trust's list:


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, May 29, 8:57 a.m. Inappropriate

The Bas Haus controversy stems from a roll back of previous Capitol Hill housing and commercial development restrictions. These restriction roll backs were encouraged by the Capitol Hill merchants as a way to encourage new development on broadway and other areas that had been heavily impacted by street people, beggars, drug addicts and the like. Remember when Safeway left Braodway? or How about when McDonalds left University Ave? Same canary in a cage situation. As far as hospitals expanding by tearing down existing housing, a denied demolition permit means nothing.More inventive techniques may come to play. For example on First Hill a decade ago a suspicious kitchen fire was used as the rationale for condemning and razing a perfectly fine mid rise apartment thus ensuring hospital expansion. Ruthlessmess rules the day.

chapala21

Posted Wed, May 30, 8:38 a.m. Inappropriate

Allow me to chime in with an endorsement for the preservation of the Jensen-Byrd Building in Spokane. As a Spokane native I know it well. The Jensen-Byrd warehouse is a mammoth early-20th-century building that could be put to good use as part of the expanding Washington State University campus in that part of the city. Alas, WSU officials lack the vision that the developers of the UW branch campus in Tacoma seemed to have when they incorporated similar structures into their campus plan. WSU is saying it's just too much trouble. All I can say to my friends in Eastern Washington is, shame on you. Spokane's historic preservation record is dismal. The downtown area used to be filled with buildings like these, but since the seventies perhaps as many as two thirds of them have been pulled down, most of them for parking lots, a few for buildings substantially smaller and less interesting than those they replaced. Sounds like the same thing will happen here. The thing I wonder -- do those Cougars really want the world to know that the Huskies make them look like Philistines?

ErikSmith

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »