Cities gear up for bikes
A survey of what many American cities are doing to make urban biking safer and more attractive. Motorists and businesses complain at first but are adjusting quickly.
You can glimpse the future right now in forward-looking American cities — a few blocks here, a mile there where people riding bicycles are protected from rushing cars and trucks.
Chicago’s Kinzie Street, just north of downtown, offers a good picture of this transportation transformation. New bike lanes are marked with bright green paint and separated from motor traffic by a series of plastic posts. This means bicyclists glide through the busy area in the safety of their own space on the road. Pedestrians are thankful that bikes no longer seek refuge on the sidewalks, and many drivers appreciate the clear, orderly delineation about where bikes and cars belong.
“Most of all this is a safety project,” notes Chicago’s Transportation Commissioner Gabe Klein. “We saw bikes go up from a 22 percent share of traffic to 52 percent of traffic on the street with only a negligible change in motorists’ time, but a drop in their speeds. That makes everyone safer.”
Klein heralds this new style of bike lane as one way to improve urban mobility in an era of budget shortfalls. “They’re dirt cheap to build compared to road projects.”
“The Kinzie project was discombobulating to the public when it first went in,” notes Alderman Margaret Laurino, chair of the city council’s Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Committee. “Business owners had questions. But now people understand it and we’re ready to do more.”
“Protected bike lanes are not just for diehard bicyclists — they offer a level of safety and confidence for less experienced riders,” adds Rey Colón, a Chicago alderman who first saw how well these innovations work on a trip to Seville, Spain.
Mayor Rahm Emmanuel campaigned on the promise of building 100 miles of these “green lanes” over the next four years to heighten the city’s appeal to new businesses. After the protected bike lane opened on Kinzie Street last year, more were installed on Jackson Boulevard and 18th Street on the city’s Near West Side. Thirteen more miles are planned this summer throughout the city. The Chicago suburb of Evanston just announced plans to install protected bike lanes on one of its busy streets.
People on bikes everywhere feel more safe and comfortable on busy streets with a physical barrier between them and motor vehicles. In some places it’s a plastic post or line of parked cars. In others it’s a curb, planter or slightly elevated bike lanes. But no matter what separates people on bikes from people in cars, the results are hefty increases in the number and variety of people bicycling.
“We’ve seen biking almost triple on parts of 15th Street NW since installing a protected bike lane last year,” reports Jim Sebastian, Active Transportation Project Manager for the District of Columbia. “And we’re seeing different kinds of cyclists beyond the Lycra crowd. People in business suits, high heels, families out for a ride, more younger and older people.”
This particular bike lane — one of more than 50 protected bikeways built recently in at least 20 cities from New York to Minneapolis to Long Beach, California — is richly symbolic for Americans. It follows 15th St. Northwest to the White House.
“This is what cities of the future are doing to attract businesses and young people,” notes Andy Clarke, president of the League of American Bicyclists. “People don’t want to drive all the time; they want a choice.”
The Green Lane Project, an initiative to showcase these next-generation transportation improvements, was launched this week (May 31) in six U.S. cities: Chicago, Washington D.C., Memphis, Austin, San Francisco, and Portland, Oregon.
The Green Lane Project is coordinated by the Bikes Belong Foundation. Advisors to the project include New York City Department of Transportation (which has already pioneered five miles of protected lanes on six streets), the National Association of City Transportation Officials and the League of American Bicyclists. Major funders include Volkswagen of America, SRAM, Interbike, the Taiwan Bicycle Exporters Association and the Bikes Belong Coalition.
The name “green lane” was chosen not only to draw attention to the typical color of protected bike lanes but also to highlight their potential in improving the urban environment and saving on transportation costs. “Green lanes are not just a color on the street. They are paths to better cities,” the project’s website explains, adding that more people on bikes eases congestion and boosts residents’ health, sense of community and economic opportunities.
The project will connect elected officials, city planners, traffic engineers, bike advocates and citizens in these six cities to share experiences, trade data and swap ideas, says Project Director Martha Roskowski. Until this year she ran GO Boulder, the alternative transportation effort at the city of Boulder, Colorado, which built its first protected bike lane in the early 1990s.
“The idea is to create the kind of bike networks that will attract the 60 percent of all Americans who say they would bike more if they felt safer,” says Randy Neufeld, a longtime bike advocate in Chicago who as Director of the SRAM Cycling Fund helped start the Green Lane Project.
The proliferation of new bikesharing systems — where people can conveniently rent bikes at on-street stations with a credit card and return them to another station near their destination — creates new demand for green lanes by getting more riders on the streets. Bike share is now running full board in Washington, Denver, Boston, Minneapolis, Chattanooga and Miami Beach and coming soon to New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other cities.
This story comes to Crosscut via citiwire.net, a media service covering urban issues.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Mon, Jun 4, 8:05 p.m. Inappropriate
Jay -- I agree, cycletracks and a network of Neighborhood Greenways on non-arterial streets will greatly enhance connections for pedstrians and bicycles alike. Here is the link to my blog; I have written repeatedly about Neighborhood Greeneways and am grateful for what we've learned from Portland. Portland has created 60 miles of Greenways in less than five years. So can we for roughly $150,000 per mile and we'll have the support of drivers and the freight community!! http://bagshaw.seattle.gov/category/neighborhood-greenways-2/
Sally Bagshaw
Seattle City Council
Posted Mon, Jun 11, 6:45 p.m. Inappropriate
Why do you council critters cater to bicyclists when they don't even pay a dedicated vehicle fee? Someone with a moped has to be licensed and pay $85 a year, but a bicyclist gets off scot free. Car drivers typically pay more than $100.
But who do you listen to do or care about? Not the ones who pay the bills, but the ones who don't. Time for a change at the city council. Time for you people to remember who pays the bills in this city.
Posted Tue, Jun 5, 12:18 p.m. Inappropriate
I'm glad to see more attention paid to mixed transportation, but I think we're going to need some enhanced traffic education for everyone (drivers, riders and walkers) to make this a safe transition. One example of a sticky situation -- when I'm going to make a right turn (from the right hand lane) across a bike only lane (rather than the shared car/bike lanes) I think I yield to bike riders who are driving through the intersection, but it's not clear to everyone. I've seen major hesitation moments from everyone involved (a variation of the "no, after you" practice at 4-way stops), and it's led to some near misses. If we're not sure of the rules, we're a danger to the people around us: on foot, on bikes or in cars.
Posted Tue, Jun 5, 12:27 p.m. Inappropriate
I visualize this as making the existing "sharrows" more emphatically defined. I'm not sure that's correct but the description above sounds like the bike lanes we currently have (on streets that have wide traffic lanes) with the addition of "physical barriers" between the car traffic and the bikes. This sounds problematic where there are parked cars on the right side of the bike lane and, of course, cars do turn right at intersections. A diagram or photo might be helpful. Another minor puzzle: do those who "Share" bikes share helmets also? or is it BYOH? another thing to put in one's pack I guess. I notice the photos show riders sans helmet which might even be illegal in Seattle. Do bike articles always have to be so breezily upbeat? are there no bike skeptics at Crosscut?
Posted Tue, Jun 5, 12:30 p.m. Inappropriate
Bicycles should be forced to use sidewalks, which already exist, and are already separated from traffic lanes. Riding bicycles in traffic lanes should be illegal.
And anyone on a bicycle riding on a street towing a little trailer with a child in it should be arrested for child endangerment. How stupid are those idiots? It's one thing to risk your own life by stupidly riding a bike on a street with motor vehicles, but to also risk the life of a little child? Unbelievable.
Bicycling will never be a serious form of transportation for more than a tiny fraction of people. Most people bike just for recreation. And even most serious bikers (a very tiny percentage of travelers) won't bike in cold rain, which happens in Seattle on a fairly regular basis.
Just force bicycles to use sidewalks, make it illegal for bikes to use streets, and leave it at that. No need to waste millions of dollars on
"bike lanes" that will be used by just a tiny fraction of the public.
Posted Tue, Jun 5, 9:07 p.m. Inappropriate
That's not going to work. Pedestrians already hate bicyclists because they are faster and just like cars on the road, run them down.
As for it being a tiny percentage, yep it's a hair's breath under 4% commute by bicycle. But if those same folks instead chose to drive it would be worse for the drivers, more competition for parking, gasoline, road space in front of you, instead of beside you.
As for spending millions on infrastructure, the city of Seattle spends about the same percentage on bicycling as there are riders. So it's not like bicyclists are hogging the money either.
And then there is the health benefits of cycling, lower rates of diabetes, heart disease etc. That's less drain on the cities own budget for their own employees who ride as well as a competitive advantage for a business which locates in the city and has employees who ride.
As for weather that's unbikeable... only when it freezes and then it's usually undrivable as well since we don't own near enough plows and salt trucks.
Posted Thu, Jun 7, 11:23 p.m. Inappropriate
When the weather is bad you see almost no bicyclists in Seattle. Dream on.
The people who ride bikes would likely take the bus if they did not ride bikes, generating more fare revenue for our bus system, and adding few, if any cars to the roads.
Everyone hates bicyclists -- not just pedestrians. So, force bicyclists to ride very slowly on the sidewalks, which would be safer for everyone, including the bicyclists, and save us a whole lot of money.
Posted Fri, Jun 8, 4:37 p.m. Inappropriate
Why not have a system where people can choose to walk, bike, ride transit, and drive when it suits them? I do all of these things depending on the distance and trip type. Why force everyone into one type?
Bikes are a part of our city's future. You're the one stuck looking in the review mirror.
Posted Sat, Jun 9, 12:46 p.m. Inappropriate
Bikes are a part of our city's future. You're the one stuck looking in the review mirror.
They've always been here. The issue is the degree that their fantasies get indulged.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.