Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Douglas Honig and Richard Shipley some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

A Northwest professor looks at a forgotten American pandemic

Crosscut writer Robin Lindley talks with University of Puget Sound professor Nancy Bristow about the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic and America's foggy memory of a disease that claimed ten times the U.S. fatalities during World War 1.
Nancy Bristow

Nancy Bristow Ross Mulhausen

Soldiers lie sick with Spanish influenza at Fort Riley, Kansas. The virus would claim the lives of 50 million people, 3 percent of the world's population at the time.

Soldiers lie sick with Spanish influenza at Fort Riley, Kansas. The virus would claim the lives of 50 million people, 3 percent of the world's population at the time. US Army/Wikimedia Commons

The epidemic is seldom mentioned, and most Americans have apparently forgotten it. This is not surprising. The human mind always tries to expunge the intolerable from memory, just as it tries to conceal it while current.

— H.L. Mencken on the 1918 influenza pandemic

The toll was staggering. From 1918 to 1920, influenza killed more that 50 million people as it spread around the world in the worst pandemic in recorded history. 

In the United States, the flu infected a quarter of the population and killed 675,000 people — more than ten times the number of American combat deaths in World War I.  And this unusual form of influenza proved especially lethal to healthy young adults. The epidemic shook the confidence of medical professionals who were unable to determine the cause of the flu or develop a cure.

The epidemic devastated the United States, yet it soon became a forgotten moment in American history. In her new book American Pandemic: The Lost Worlds of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic (Oxford), Tacoma historian and professor Dr. Nancy K. Bristow delves into the social and cultural world of Americans during the pandemic and traces the ensuing national amnesia.

Bristow recounts this desperate time from the perspective of flu patients and their families to medical professionals and community leaders based on her extensive study of primary sources including letters, diaries, oral histories, memoirs, novels, newspapers, magazines, photographs, government documents, and medical literature.

Coupled with being a teacher of American history with an emphasis on race and social change at the University of Puget Sound in Tacoma, Bristow is the author of Making Men Moral: Social Engineering during the Great War and was the Washington State Professor of the Year in 2007. Incidentally, she is the great-granddaughter of two of the pandemic's fatalities.

Bristow recently talked by telephone about her study of the influenza pandemic and her passion for history from her home on Vashon Island.

Robin Lindley:  Did your family story about the deaths of your great grandparents during the influenza epidemic spark your interest in the pandemic?

Dr. Nancy Bristow:  It did. I was backpacking with my father, and during one of those trail conversations it became clear to me that my great grandparents had died during the pandemic. From the very beginning, I sought to make sense of what happened to these people — relatives I had never known. They had been immigrants from Ireland, people without a lot of resources who didn’t leave a record when they died. They just disappeared for us. So this was an effort to build the world in which they lived and died, and in which my grandfather was left an orphan.

Lindley:  Didn’t your great grandparents die within a few days of each other?

Bristow:  We don’t know for sure. The family lore suggests that Elizabeth Bristow died and, immediately following her funeral, John Bristow began feeling ill and then passed away in a couple of days. Within a week, according to this narrative, my grandfather lost his mother and his father. 

Lindley: Where did the United States fit into the story of the worldwide pandemic?

Bristow:  It was an enormous international event. Demographers are still trying to estimate [the casualties] because so many countries then did not have public health recordkeeping. Fifty million [deaths worldwide] is a good guess. The United States was very much in the center of the pandemic. The first wave in the spring of 1918 goes largely unnoticed, mistaken for the usual flu coming through. It’s only in retrospect that we see the connection to the major pandemic. It erupts in a second wave in late August in the United States, France and Sierra Leone almost simultaneously. From there it rages around the world.

The United States suffered in ways similar to the rest of the world. We had the advantages and disadvantages of being an industrialized nation. Influenza traveled fast for us because the virus could travel at the speed of railroads.  But we had some of the advantages of modernized public health and health care as well. 


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Jun 27, 12:03 p.m. Inappropriate

I was just talking to my 98-year-old mother a couple of days ago as she reminisced about her early life in Russia. When she was about five or six, she was taken to her grandmother's home, who wanted to see her before she died. As she went there (a long walk from her own home), my mother remembers passing dead bodies in the street. I had heard this story before and always assumed that they were victims of a pogrom, but my mother said, no, they were dead from the "sickness." She was talking about this flu since this was about 1919 and apparently, there were so many dead that many lay in the streets, unburied.

Ronzy2

Posted Wed, Jun 27, 1:05 p.m. Inappropriate

My great-uncle was a victim of the pandemic in 1918 while he was a young military doctor caring for troops deploying to Europe for World War I. His death rippled through all the following generations in my family. My uncle became a cellular biologist to research diseases even though his uncle died before he was born. One of my cousins researches the sociological impact of pandemics and another is also a biologist. Even my niece, 3 generations removed, is going in to medical research. It is hard for my family to consider this a "forgotten pandemic".

sdatherly

Posted Wed, Jun 27, 8:05 p.m. Inappropriate

Just as President Ronald Reagan 'ignored' and failed to mention A.I.D.S. for the first 5 years of his presidency and thus is 'responsible' for the following 650,000+ deaths from that disease, so must be held responsible the progressive President Woodrow Wilson for this 1918-1920 pandemic...don't we all just love left-wing so-called 'logic'?

animalal

Posted Wed, Jul 4, 11:10 p.m. Inappropriate

Reagan's administration had a lot to do with how the National Institutes of Health spent tax dollars on research. During the 80s, almost no money was going to AIDS research because it wasn't considered a priority by the administration.

Your analogy to Wilson's administration is pretty silly. As the interview states, the existence of viruses wasn't known until the 1930s.

sarah90

Posted Fri, Jun 29, 7:57 p.m. Inappropriate

We can expect worse, maybe far worse, pandemics in future. And they could be totally different from 1918. Antibiotics, one of the greatest medical miracles of all time, probably won't be much help because their effectiveness has been squandered by their shortsighted use "subtherapeutically" in animal feed. We will all pay the price for that, maybe someday soon.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »