A powerful first year for the Seattle Symphony's Ludovic Morlot

The orchestra is far more engaged, the programming is more meaningful, and many (not all) performances teem with expressive attention to detail.

(Page 2 of 2)

One of Morlot’s June concerts was, for me, the unequivocal high point of the season and a memorable confirmation of his extraordinary gifts. He devoted an entire program to Berlioz’s The Damnation of Faust, leading not only the SSO but its chorus and a lineup of vocal soloists. It’s a fascinating problem piece and has been variously staged as an opera and a concert oratorio. There isn’t even consensus as to its genre, and Berlioz labeled his audacious rewrite of the Goethe source a “dramatic legend.”

Here was everything Morlot has to offer, confidently brought together in a blissful evening of music making that made me wish these events weren’t so short-lived (only two performances) but could be restaged and experienced again at different points in the season. Even a bizarre offstage glitch (a patron’s personal alarm going off in the second half and forcing a brief impromptu intermission) wasn’t able to derail the maestro’s intense focus.

Above all what Morlot demonstrated was his remarkable sense for the inherent drama of a musical score: the drama contained within notes, phrases, instrumentation, all creating the emotional arch of a piece, as opposed to the reductive narratives of program music. Morlot has shown over and over that he has a great talent for telling stories, in that deeper sense, through music. This comes through in the details, the sense of fore-, middle-, and background he paints with the orchestra, but here it cohered into an abundantly satisfying whole as well.

Already this weekend tickets go on sale for the coming SSO season, in which Morlot will have a larger presence, conducting 10 of the regular masterworks programs as well as several other series (family concerts, chamber events, and the ongoing “Sonic Evolution” series). Two not-to-miss events will be the SSO’s first-ever performances of two 20th-century monuments: Messiaen’s lush, sprawling, exuberant Turangalîla Symphony and the moving War Requiem of Benjamin Britten (hard to believe this has never been done here!). There’s also a larger proportion of standard Central European rep, including Mozart, Beethoven, and Brahms, through which we can observe the evolution of a young maestro and the continuing refinement of the SSO.

 


Topics: Music

About the Author

Thomas May currently lives in Seattle and writes for the Metropolitan Opera, San Francisco Symphony, Los Angeles Philharmonic, Listenmagazine, and many other publications. His books include Decoding Wagner and The John Adams Reader. He abandoned his teenage attempt to compose a symphony when he realized his ideas had been stolen by Bruckner. You can reach him c/o editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Sun, Aug 5, 12:19 a.m. Inappropriate

I've been a subscriber of the Bravo series for...what...six years now, I feel like I own my seat (GG-8). The performances do get better each year and Seattle Symphony, for a novice listener like myself, straddles the fence between delivering chestnuts and taking the audiences to more experimental places (I tend to like those better).

However, I will say, the biggest problem for them is not the music, but their building. I know its one of Seattle's monumental New Urbist structures, but it's location and design are atrocious. I would like nothing better than to take transit from here in Kent to downtown, have an afternoon there and return, safely...but 3rd Avenue has become a horrible haven for derelicts. LINK is nice, but sometimes it gets dicey towards the end (I park my car at Tukwila).

But there are other problems. The hall is just supremely...uncomfortable. Especially the foyer and dining areas. It's like there just wasn't enough space so it ends up feeling like being stuck in a slot canyon...too tall and not at all wide. The seats around the edge are few and far between and uncomfortable when waiting. There isn't enough table space in the dining area where I like to come earlier and get the dinner special at Wolfgang's.

One other thing -- and call me paranoid -- but lots of times I have trouble keeping my eyes open during the first part of the performance. I initially thought it was tiredness from work, or perhaps my inability to appreciate fine art -- but then I thought...mmm, underground parking lot. Any chance some of that carbon monoxide is wafting up.

Really, I think we need a new symphony building...something perhaps more regional than Seattle-centric. Something that recognizes the 21st century (malls, parking lots, all that stuff). There is no reason why this, like the sports stadiums, should be designed to handle and accommodate access to all 3 million people in Western Washington...and be fully equipped and up to date.

Let's put the 80s behind us...and recognize that some of us want to be entertained...but prefer to get there easily by car, from a highway, and have all the amenities, free from oxycontin dealers on the street.

jabailo

Posted Sun, Aug 5, 1:25 a.m. Inappropriate

You didn't mention the biggest problem: The harsh sound. This tends to be a problem in just about all of the newer concert halls built according to modernist design fads. They think they can position a bunch of angular baffles behind the orchestra to correct the errors, but it doesn't work.

But I can say this much: If they ever move the symphony building out of Seattle, that'll be the end of it for me, and I suspect for a great many of their subscribers, especially now that the "eco" warriors have decided they'll make it harder and harder to get out of the city and back in any reasonable amount of time.

And we just know that if they built a new one, it'd be just as modernist, if not more so, and even harsher when it came to the sound, no matter how much high-tech they stick in there. (Maybe they figure the harsh sound will go well with all the modernist dreck they feel they have to play?) The really ironic thing is that all anyone really needs to do is take a picture of the inside of Carnegie Hall and build a duplicate. But that wouldn't cut it, naturally.

NotFan

Posted Fri, Aug 10, 9:11 a.m. Inappropriate

Interesting comments on Benaroya Hall. Acoustically, its great merit is its extreme quiet, a kind of "velvet silence," achieved by all the insulation necessary to avoid sound from the railroad tunnel beneath it. It was tuned, to my ears, to reflect the bright, brassy, and forward sound favored by Gerard Schwarz, who oversaw the design and picked the acoustician. It has unusually shallow balconies, to aid the acoustics and avoid overhangs, but this makes the hall very long. Meanwhile, the best place for hearing is in the balconies, as is true of almost all halls, including Meany Hall.

I agree with the comment about the awkwardness of the long gallery along Third Avenue, where patrons squeeze past a cafeteria-like setting, gazing out at all the bus passengers on the sidewalk. Many new halls have lots of differently-sized spaces for dining and other functions, which give a more intimate feel. One hopes the impressive new regime at the SSO will pays some attention to warming up the spaces in the Hall.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »