Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Nancy Ashley and Terence Tazioli some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    Playing God with our food: Who profits from bad weather?

    Seattle is living in a bubble of stable weather. But eastern Pacific storms and Midwest droughts are cranking up everyone's food prices.
    Sardines being cooked over a fire on a beach in Spain

    Sardines being cooked over a fire on a beach in Spain glidemax/via Wikimedia Commons

    It is easy to confuse geography with destiny. We are fortunate, here on the northwest coast of North America.

    Our climate is mild, and our biggest volcano is dormant. Our harvest this fall — apples, cherries, grapes — is bountiful. Our waters teem with big fish, our ports thrive with commerce. In fact, we live in an idyllic bubble, protected somehow by the spirit of our sacred salmon and our magic mountain. The rest of the world is dark, dangerous and unpredictable. 

    Geography and politics often interconnect, sometimes on the battlefield, sometimes at the ballot box, sometimes on the world's dinner plate. It's worth remembering that the Arab Spring uprising wasn't a spontaneous, pro-democracy demonstration, but a protest against food shortages. 

    Two examples showed up this year of natural phenomena that affect our global, interdependent food system, with very different results. One on land, one by sea.

    First: the oceans. Earlier this year, there were storms off the coast of Peru. As a result, the anchovy harvest dropped. Anchovies, sojme 20 percent of all global fishing, are used in fish oil and fish meal, not just in Caesar salads and as pizza toppings. They're also a key ingredient in the feed for farmed salmon.

    The shortage in fish meal came on the heels of a second meteriological event beyond human control, the drought in America's heartland. As a result, the corn crop dropped by almost 50 percent, and the price of corn almost doubled this year.

    Those perky yellow ears of corn on the grocery shelves are deceiving; the vast majority of America's corn is used for ethanol, animal feed and sweeteners. One reason that American beef is significantly more expensive this year than last, of course, is that much of this year's vastly reduced corn crop is being diverted from feed lots to distilleries. Distilleries produce ethanol for fuel. And corn is converted to high fructose corn syrups as industrial sweeters.

    Parenthetically, because it's getting so much more expensive to fatten cattle with grain, some feed lots have supplemented their diets with vast quantities of out-of-date candy, according to an article in Huffington Post, because it contains corn-based sweeteners.

    Meanwhile, with fewer cows shuffling to their fate at the kill line, you'd think there would be more buyers for lower-priced pork. Hog farmers, though, can't afford the feed either; they're slaughtering their herds prematurely, putting the carcasses into cold storage, and hoping for the best.

    Now back to the fish farms, most of which are in the icy waters off Norway and Scotland. Because of the smaller anchovy catch, it's becoming more expensive to raise salmon, even as the demand for farmed fish is skyrocketing. This year, water temperatures in the North Atlantic have been a couple of degrees warmer than normal. This has had a big effect on the appetite of salmon, which has led to record harvests, up 30 percent this year.

    The result of the glut, despite the greater expense of feeding the salmon, is a price drop. As a result, consumption of farmed salmon in Europe is up 25 percent, even in countries in recession. It's up 67 percent in Russia, and up 85 percent in Brazil (where the fish comes from a strong Chilean industry). Even China, which doesn't have a tradition of eating fish filets, is eating more salmon.

    The American consumer, whose diet relies more on beef than fish, will simply end up paying more for dinner.

    The big winners in all this are the international banks (who finance the Peruvian anchovy fleets, for example) and the low-profile international commodities brokers: the Swiss firm Glencore is very big in wheat, ADM in corn, Louis Dreyfus in rice, Cargill in just about everything.

    Glencore told The Guardian last week that the anchovy shortage "is good for business."

    These are the outfits who compete fiercely for the business of buying up the food supply (whatever the price) and moving it to market. It's an almost unregulated, global industry with trillion-dollar profits, which makes money in good weather and bad, and it's the reason you could soon be paying an extra buck for your burger.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Fri, Sep 21, 9:59 a.m. Inappropriate

    Good reason to be vegetarian and give up the high cost and environmental damage caused by raising beef! HK


    Posted Fri, Sep 21, 10:52 a.m. Inappropriate

    While I respect your decision, henrykuh, the point of the article was that it really doesn't matter what individuals think or do. Unpredictable weather created two crises this year; one resulted in less beef, the other in more salmon. What we shold do is ensure that government policies favoring commodity crops don't make the situation worse.

    Posted Fri, Sep 21, 10:34 p.m. Inappropriate

    Characterizing these events as "... a second meteriological event beyond human control..." is grossly misleading IMHO. Both were undoubtedly results of the human caused global climate change. If we continue to allow ourselves to be so misled we will waste our last 5-10 year window of opportunity to reverse this process before positive feedback systems make that impossible and we suffer hell on earth. Google "Hell on earth" for an article on the science of global climate change, and where we are headed . . .


    Posted Fri, Sep 21, 10:59 p.m. Inappropriate

    OOPS! I can't find the article by Googling "Hell on earth". Please be patient and I'll post the correct way to access it when I find it myself.


    Posted Fri, Sep 21, 11:04 p.m. Inappropriate

    OK,the way to it is: Google "OpEdNews Hell on Earth", without the quotes of course.


    Posted Sat, Sep 22, 9:18 a.m. Inappropriate

    Thanks for the link, boho7. I stand by my words, "beyond human control," even as I acknowledge the possibility that these events may have been the consequence of human actions. Becoming a vegetarian today won't change what's already happened, and the actions, however sincere, of one person are not likely to prevent future droughts or storms at sea. What's needed is a national policy to address the issue, not just handwringing.

    Posted Sat, Sep 22, 4:30 p.m. Inappropriate

    My point is that IMHO the media, including Crosscut, must begin informing readers that all other issues than global climate change fade into total insignificance if that one issue is not dealt with effectively and immediately. Without that there will be no one and no thing left alive to even be aware of all those many othert issues.


    Posted Sat, Sep 22, 5:44 p.m. Inappropriate

    I won't speak for Crosscut's editors, boho7, but even the established and reliable progressive sites like Op Ed News and Daily Kos know they cannot survive on a single issue, no matter how important.

    Calling attention to distant "events" (regardless of what caused them) that don't get reported in the American press (those missing anchovies) does in fact point out the consequences of climate change.

    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »