Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Charnley Marsden and Silvia Ceravolo some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    Science faces the fate of the sea

    Nearly 500 researchers from around the world meet in Monterey for an epic conference on ocean acidification, and Crosscut is there.
    A few more mini-stops down the pH scale and corals will cease reef-building entirely.

    A few more mini-stops down the pH scale and corals will cease reef-building entirely. Eric Scigliano

    Jellyfish don't build calcium carbonate shells, so they may thrive in acidifying seas.

    Jellyfish don't build calcium carbonate shells, so they may thrive in acidifying seas. Eric Scigliano

    One way to measure the urgency of the scientific response to ocean acidification is by its carbon footprint. In 2004, 125 marine scientists gathered in a single room in Paris to ponder the effects that surging loads of human-generated carbon dioxide into the atmosphere might have on the sea below. They heard 24 research presentations, nearly the sum total of papers published on the subject worldwide that year.

    That they were discussing “ocean acidification” at all was somewhat serendipitous: The term itself had only been coined the year before; scientists had anticipated for decades that CO2 levels would rise in the sea, which absorbs the gas from the air, but only recently considered the effects this would have on its chemistry and biota. Their meeting was originally convened to explore the then-fashionable idea of dumping more carbon into the ocean.

    Four years later, 227 researchers gathered in Monaco for the second installment, with 44 presentations. Two weeks ago, 542 racked up the air miles to get to Monterey, California for the Third International Symposium on the Ocean in a High-CO2 World. They came from as far afield as Iceland, Chile, Bangladesh and New Zealand, and braved a rapid-fire marathon of 146 research presentations, culled from hundreds more.

    Some of the findings could come from a horror movie: Toxic algae such as those that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (“red tide”) and amnesiac shellfish poisoning (the inspiration for Hitchcock’s The Birds) become more toxic yet when CO2 saturation rises and levels of certain minerals fall. More CO2 (which means more acidity or less alkalinity) plus warmer water makes European crab shells “bleed calcium” — i.e., dissolve. Scampi’s claws get so brittle they snap off. Summer flounder lose cartilage and suffer liver damage and deformed muscle. Lowering the pH level by .3 points (which doubles the acidity level, as you doubtless recall from high school chemistry) cuts their survival by half. 

    Since humans began spewing industrial-scale quantities of carbon into the air, oceanic surface pH has fallen by more than .1 point, to about 8.1 — faster than any past change uncovered in the geological record. If it falls by .3 points more it will reach what coral experts call a “critical threshold.” Below pH 7.8, one warned in Monterey, “reef development ceases.”

    The effects extend beyond unlucky critters and imperiled ecosystems; they feed back to the climate itself. Through a chemical knock-on process, the ocean’s uptake of CO2 reduces its production of another compound, dimethylsulfide (DMS). This marine DMS is the largest natural source of sulfur in the atmosphere, and that sulfur screens out solar radiation. Less sulfur means more planetary warming—compounding the impact of carbon emissions.

    These effects are so far largely matters of extrapolation (i.e., modeling) or manipulation — experiments performed by pumping CO2 into tanks or “mesocosms” sealed off from the rest of the sea. They show what will happen if our species keeps burning, consuming, and emitting as it has been (and so far it’s shown little inclination toward restraint). Mitt Rommey, a born-again climate-change denialist when it‘s expedient, scores campaign points by mocking the very idea.

    Again and again, however, the assembled researchers noted one region where acidification is clear, present, and meticulously documented, with economic as well as ecological impacts: the Pacific Northwest. Here, upwellings of deep offshore water (where CO2 concentrates) push into shore in summer and fall, sending pH levels plummeting. This distinct regional effect is compounded by a common ill along shores where lots of people live and farm: nutrient-rich sewage outfalls and agricultural runoff, which fertilize bumper algal blooms that take carbon from the air, then die, rot, and release it into the water.

    As previously reported, these dual acid factors nearly destroyed the region’s oyster industry, killing the bivalves’ larvae in their vulnerable first weeks. (Research presented in Monterey shows that even if they survive larval exposure to high-CO2, low-pH water, native Olympia oysters grow up stunted.) Shellfish hatcheries in Oregon and Washington have learned to dance around the problem so far by obsessively monitoring CO2 and other factors in their intake water, and only drawing it when and where it’s sweetest.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Tue, Oct 9, 9:33 a.m. Inappropriate

    Paris, Monaco, Monterey...

    another effect of ocean acidification: increased travel costs for the jet-setting intelligentsia


    Posted Tue, Oct 9, 4:02 p.m. Inappropriate

    Yes, maybe there should be an code of conduct for scientists, in which they agree to take only one work-related airline round trip per year (replacing the rest of the meetings with Internet collaboration). That would go a long way to communicate the urgency of the situation.

    Posted Wed, Oct 10, 11:48 a.m. Inappropriate

    Why aren't scientist decrying the sulfurous emissions by China? That is a result of burning dirty coal. Sulfur in the oceans creates sulfuric acid which lowers pH. Instead, environmentalists want higher sulfur levels in the atmosphere -- the obvious result is increased acid rain.

    Meanwhile, environmentalists continue to promote subsidizing food-to-fuel biofuel, which has a low positive conversion rate, and which has been proven to INCREASE global CO2 emissions. Another effect of environmental bioethanol mandates is to destroy the legacy gas engines (both open cycle, and older vehicles), thus forcing consumers, industry, and government to replace equipment and raising the emissions of companies that make the replacements.

    Global environmental policy is stuck on 'stupid'.

    Posted Sun, Oct 14, 11:46 a.m. Inappropriate

    Last paragraph says it all....

    That law and the Endangered Species Act provide powerful weapons for addressing acidification, Sakashita declared. But science needs to provide the ammunition. “Develop local data, which [is] what the states want.”

    Like the NPDES, its all about studying and fingerpointing with no action or conclusion, just good ole bureaucracy.


    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »