Transcript: Mariners' execs tell the bigger story behind arena opposition
Art Thiel probes the issues with the Seattle Mariners' CEO Howard Lincoln and the club's legal counsel, Bart Waldman.
Paul R. Kucher IV/Wikimedia Commons
I sat down this week with Howard Lincoln, CEO of the Mariners, and Bart Waldman, the club’s legal counsel, to ask questions about the club’s objections to Chris Hansen’s proposed basketball/hockey arena that abuts the team’s parking garage in SoDo.
The city and county councils are expected to vote Monday to approve a memorandum of understanding with Hansen, a little more than six months after the Mariners wrote a letter to all parties saying the project “will not work” so close to their stadium and other businesses.
Here is the full transcript of the interview:
Q: Isn’t the primary reason for your opposition to the arena the threat posed by one or two more sports teams crowding the market?
Lincoln: I don’t think we’ve done as good a job as we should have in explaining our position to our public and our fans. I think our only issue is the ability of our fans to get to Safeco Field because of the worsening congestion in this area.
We’re not concerned about competition. The Sonics were here before we were. When they were here, we never even thought about competition. Our view is there is room in this market for the NBA, and the NHL as well.
This ownership group is the steward for major league baseball here. We felt an obligation to speak out and alert political leaders of our concern. It’s strictly about fans getting here. If they can’t get here, then baseball doesn’t work.
I was an NBA fan long before I was a Mariners fan. I saw Lenny Wilkens play at Seattle Center. My heroes were Freddy Brown, Dennis Johnson, Lonnie Shelton, and Jack Sikma. I was at those games before the 1979 championship. I remember (Golden State All-Star) Rick Barry almost running over my head when somebody threw beer at him.
The idea of the Sonics coming back is great. We don’t think an NBA arena works next to our parking garage. We are very pleased the way this is going — an environmental impact study that addresses fully the traffic and scheduling issues.
The one thing we didn’t make clear in the April 3 letter is we have a problem that is unique regarding scheduling. MLB announces its schedule in August each year and we have no ability to change the schedule. Other sports have more flexibility.
Q: Why do you think your position is misunderstood and denigrated?
Lincoln: Sports fans are pretty emotional. There’s a ton of people emotionally involved in getting the Sonics back. It’s easy for them to say the Mariners shouldn’t say anything, and that the Mariners have problems other than the one we expressed [congestion].
To the extent they have misunderstood what we’ve tried to say, I’d be the first to apologize.
Q: Isn’t the problem of seasonal overlaps something that can be negotiated and managed?
Waldman: We’ve looked at NBA and NHL master schedules. Depending on playoffs, you’d typically have six to 12 conflicts annually if both teams were here and made the playoffs. Roughly half the teams in each sport make the playoffs, so that would occur roughly half the time. We think it would be on average three regular season games and three playoff games for each sport.
The only place in the country that has all four teams in buildings close together is Philadlphia. They also have 22,000 surface parking spaces there, and the sports sites are not near their port, it’s away from downtown traffic, and is served by two major freeways and four major on and off ramps. Nor does Philadelphia have railroad tracks on one side and water on the other.
You can always deal with a one-off event a couple of times. We have done that with the Sounders, and we work like crazy to make it happen. We just did that recently (by changing a Saturday start time to reduce the conflict). You don’t want it to be a regular condition.
The difficulty is other events. The traditional wisdom on arenas is that you need 200-plus events to be successful; Chris Hansen has been saying 200-250 events a year. [Note: In an April interview with SPNW, Hansen said the arena, in the absence of an NHL team, could work financially with 120 event dates.] It’s the concerts, circuses, ice shows, trade shows and everything else that is typical to most arenas that’s the biggest problem. As many as a third to a half of our games can be conflicted. You start to get in a fight every Friday night with a concert versus a ballgame.
What volumes can SoDo handle on a weeknight?
Waldman: Our experience is that over 40,000, it’s gets tough. There’s no cliff, but a gradual accretion, both parking capacity and traffic, because they go together. When people don’t find parking, they circle, not sure where they’re going, which makes almost a compounding effect on traffic.
The original response from some political leaders was that the area handles Seahawks games that typically draw more than 65,000. But most are on Sunday. If you look at Monday or Thursday (NFL) games, it’s a real nightmare down here. Businesses close early and we send our [Mariners staffers] home at 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon so they can clear the area. You can’t get out of here after 5.
It’s the kind of thing when it happens once or twice, we adjust and pitch in because we all want what’s best for the community. But you don’t want to see it happen every week. It becomes very difficult.
Our crowds are different from Seahawks crowds. We hired a traffic consultant in December when we learned about the arena plan, we hired a traffic consultant. First thing we asked: How do we make it work? We weren’t trying to kill it. What we found was it was a lot more challenging than we anticipated.
The Seahawks crowd spreads out and comes in over many hours for tailgating. For the Monday night game, there were people putting up tents at 9 in the morning. By noon, I bet 25 percent of their crowd was in the vicinity, having lunch and making a day out of the game that night.
Baseball crowds come in the hour before a game, and basketball even closer. Baseball will always get some for batting practice, but most come in the hour before a game and basketball even closer. A very different pattern.
Also, rush hour comes through here because it’s one of downtown’s major routes to I-90. First Avenue South and Martinez Way is one of the busiest in the city. We saw information from an agency that rates intersections (for safety and traffic flow), which graded it as an F, a fail, the lowest rated intersection in the city.
There’s a lot of talk about this area as a transportation hub. That’s more at Union Station. Nice for the football stadium, but it’s a long walk to here and a longer walk to the Hansen site. Because of how bad traffic already is on First, Metro has moved all its buses off the street and moved the route to Fourth Avenue. That’s hard for seniors who take buses to our games and have to go home late at night all the way to Fourth.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Fri, Oct 12, 10:49 a.m. Inappropriate
Thank you for writing this. It gives some good ideas of what we need to watch for in the EIS.
Posted Fri, Oct 12, 11:11 a.m. Inappropriate
What a crock of shit. They don't even know enough about baseball to put a winning team on the field and they expect us to take them seriously about traffic?
For starters, there has been no traffic at M's games the last two years because no one is going to the games anymore and on dates when there has been some overlap with big soccer or football games, there have been no problems.
With an arena capacity of only about 20,000 max, these "phantom" traffic problems will never develop and they know that. They should concentrate on putting a real ball team on the field instead of whining about the potential traffic issues brought by a more successful franchise.
Posted Fri, Oct 12, 11:22 a.m. Inappropriate
I am not an admirer of Mariners management but I certainly don't think having another stadium down there is going to make them manage any better. I think the criticism of the traffic situation is coherent and convincing.
Posted Fri, Oct 12, 12:04 p.m. Inappropriate
Thanks Art Thiel for doing what virtually all the other "journalists" covering this story have failed to do: cogently cover all aspects of the issue.
This process has a long way to go, through the Councils' consideration, SEPA, and lawsuit(s).
At the end of the day, a publicly funded arena in Sodo is still an unwise use of public dollars. There are far more important priorities, it won't provide the economic return to justify the expense, it's corporate welfare to ensure a more profitable deal for multimillionaires and billionaires, it will raise property taxes, it will divert money that otherwise would go to the city's general fund into an arena that many people won't be able to afford entry to, and it will bollix up the city's major industrial area with traffic, drive up costs for industrial and manufacturing interests in the area and result in the loss of family-wage blue collar jobs.
Posted Mon, Oct 15, 8:33 a.m. Inappropriate
I love the Mariners but regard their position on this issue as horse manure.
The surrounding neighborhood is zoned for stadia and arenas. The prospective NBA/NHL franchise owner bought the property with his own money and, if the deal goes through, will end up with a far smaller public subsidy than the Mariners received. The city promised traffic remediation in the neighborhood long ago but, then, spent the money on the Mercer Mess redo instead. Not the arena owner's fault but he nonetheless has pledged to put up money to help with it. Congestion in the hours involved is, in any case, not great. The arena capacity---even presuming sellouts---will be far smaller than the Mariners' average (relatively small) crowd sixe.
I resent seeing fans' ticket money going to the p.r. firm which has been arguing this case for the Mariners. Their attendance is now less than half of what it was a decade ago. The reason: A deteriorating product on the field. Put the money into team payroll, fellas. It too has been falling, thus assuring one losing season after another.
Traffic congrestion near Safeco? That would be good news indeed.
It would mean that people again are coming to Mariners games.
Posted Mon, Oct 15, 11:59 a.m. Inappropriate
In DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, Jane Jacobs argued that the best approach with cultural facilities was to spread them around, not locate them all in one place. She used New York city as her example, contrasting the cluster of performance halls at Lincoln Center with the singular placement of Carnegie Hall. Her point was that cultural facilities produce spin-offs (buildings with related commercial venues) and that the best use of public dollars would be to spread them into different parts of the city so that more than one neighborhood would get the spin-off benefits. Jacobs did not address sports facilities specifically, but it seems likely that the same analysis would apply.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.