Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Lisa Erwin & Robert Fallis and Donna Totten some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    Epic Northwest battle: Defining how big a deal coal ports are

    The state has never seen an environmental review take comments from so much of the state. And unexpectedly large numbers of people are showing up to oppose shipping coal for burning in China.

    (Page 2 of 5)

    If it is expanded — and the Corps appears reluctant to do so — the environmental study could be under the auspices of any federal agency with an interest in the review. Congress would have the power to intervene, subject to presidential veto. Two decades ago, a plan by Chicago Bridge and Iron at Cherry Point prompted the Washington Legislature to enact a law suspending shoreline protection in order to allow oil-drilling rigs to be assembled; Gov. John Spellman vetoed the act. Congressional Republicans have made efforts to force President Obama to approve the Keystone Pipeline.

    Is Gateway Pacific Terminal in that league? Clearly it is of more importance than Chicago Bridge and Iron because of its principal commodity — coal is a trigger-word for climate-change activists and rail and ship traffic for Gateway would dwarf that of Chicago Bridge. It may more closely resemble an aboveground Keystone pipeline — coal trains would cross four or five states and any impact on Salish Sea marine life could affect two nations. Canada is already sending nearly 5,000 commercial ships a year (loaded and empty, tankers, bulkers and container ships) through Washington’s waters. The terminal would add nearly 1,000 more.

    A cumulative study could take into consideration the existing rail and ship traffic plus the 48-million tons of coal annually from Gateway Pacific and the 44-million tons from the proposed Millennium project at Longview. The scoping process for Millennium is about to begin with the Corps, Cowlitz County, and Ecology as partners in the study. If a decision were made for an area-wide study, the Whatcom and Cowlitz terminals could be morphed into a single review, perhaps along with three smaller proposals in Oregon.

    The size of the turnouts and the breadth and passion of the speakers has already caused a schedule change. A Seattle hearing, set for Nov. 13 at North Seattle Community College, has been moved to Dec. 13 from 4 to 7 p.m. at the Washington State Convention Center in Seattle, a much larger venue. An Ecology official said 3,000 people can be accommodated there. Agencies were concerned that the community college venue, with room for about 1,000 people, could not deal with the larger crowds they now expect.

    Opponents of coal exports waved signs and banners and many stood for over an hour in a rainstorm to pack a Bellingham gym and auditorium on Oct. 27 with about 2,000 damp bodies. In Friday Harbor on Nov. 3 the San Juan Islands’ unique mix of funky and profound saw a man in a seal mask, a rap song, a poem, and an excited Chinese student who described dire effects of burning coal in her home country.

    These unique comments were quickly followed by a host of marine scientists with very specific subjects that should be studied, and ship and ferry officers with warnings about “constrained waters with many hazards” in the shipping channels of Haro and Rosario straits, as described by retired ferry captain Ken Burtness of Lopez Island. “We put too much in and we take too much out,” said retired marine biologist M. Patricia Morse; she listed a host of marine species that would be devastated by coal spill on the floor of Haro Strait. “Almost all San Juan jobs are ocean-related,” she reminded officials.

    Native American leaders testified at Bellingham and Friday Harbor. Lummi Nation spokesman Jay Julius led off the Bellingham testimony. "Science is respected by our nation, but we have our own knowledge and teaching," Julius said. "Lummi Nation says no . . . I am personally a fisherman as my great-great-great-grandparents were fishermen ... long before the arrival of science." Julius told officials from the Corps, Whatcom County and the Washington Department of Ecology, the three co-lead agencies on the environmental review, "I would like to encourage a spiritual or soul study to be done ... to study the impacts that this will have on our people," 

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Mon, Nov 12, 8:58 a.m. Inappropriate

    Please follow this with details on land-environmental and human impacts of the planned mining and transport -- e.g. impacts such as land use, resource depletion, and climate change. These are all dimension of this story that may not be covered adequately in the main stream media. Crosscut can become the preferred and authoritative source for this ongoing reportage and analysis.


    Posted Mon, Nov 12, 11:03 a.m. Inappropriate

    This coal export project is a sham. The only logical port for the terminal facility is Longview. The most logical means of transporting the coal is by barge, an option which makes St Helens a possible site for a smaller terminal to complement Longview. There is no need to fear a coal export facility in Bellingham or Coos Bay. The Big Boys are flipping America off inside a row of hummers driving toward the fiscal cliff lined with the rest of us at the edge giving each other our last good bye.


    Posted Mon, Nov 12, 10:33 p.m. Inappropriate

    Coal or dole, we all know which way most west siders will go.


    Posted Thu, Nov 15, 3:08 a.m. Inappropriate

    The China coal ports are a stupid idea environmentally, socially, and economically. The export of this coal to power further outsourcing in China is cutting our own throat.

    As for "dole"; isn't it the east side counties who are on the dole from the west side counties? Yeah, the east side counties get welfare from the west side counties. This means that east siders are on the "dole". This means that east siders are freeloaders off of the west siders.

    So, we have a bunch of east siders preaching the gospel of "independence" and "self reliance"; while at the same time these same east siders are dependent (moochers) on west siders for free money and free resources.

    East siders already made their choice, and it was the "dole".
    West siders have a lot of choices, one of those choices is providing welfare for the less capable east siders.


    Posted Fri, Nov 16, 7:44 p.m. Inappropriate

    I don't know, but it seems like stone age technology to have to ship 1000 train cars of coal half way around the world, every day to produce energy. Why isn't it more efficient to just send the electricity half way around the world through a wire, which would be a value added product.

    There has got to be more advanced technology now that we live in "Tomorrowland".

    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »