Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Nancy B Evans and COJK PLLC some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Why the Republicans keep coming up short for governor

The state GOP legitimately has the governor blues, but there's no reason to despair about ever winning a chance to lead the state again.
Jay Inslee, left, and Rob McKenna at a debate.

Jay Inslee, left, and Rob McKenna at a debate. State of Reform

It has been 32 years since a Republican in Washington has won a race for governor, stretching back to 1980 when the Democrats were so divided that both President Jimmy Carter and Gov. Dixy Lee Ray faced primary challenges. Carter survived his from Ted Kennedy but was buried in the 41-state Reagan landslide. Dixy was tackled in the primary by Seattle state Sen. Jim McDermott, the only progressive candidate in a five member field. Three Republicans — King County Executive John Spellman, co-Speaker of the State House Duane Berentson, and Secretary of State Bruce Chapman — divided the non-liberal vote with Dixy, allowing McDermott to squeak through with the nomination. But in November, McDermott got 43.5 percent of the vote against the genial, pipe-smoking Spellman, “the man who built the Kingdome.”

Since then, it’s been eight consecutive goose eggs for the Republicans, the longest dry spell for any party in the country. Were all these races out of reach? Not really. Washington is more liberal today than it was during the Reagan era, but of those eight races, one was essentially a tie, one was squandered, one was blown in the primary, two were lost at the national level, and two others were unwinnable. Let’s take a quick look at each of them.

1984: John Spellman vs. Booth Gardner. Washington was hammered harder by the early '80s recession than any time since the Depression with unemployment topping 12 percent. (It hit 11.2 percent during our current economic ordeal.) At the national level, President Reagan went all in behind a controversial program to generate growth by cutting tax rates. But in Olympia, Gov. Spellman opted for consensus. Getting all sides and major stakeholders in a room together always sounds good on paper, but endless frustration and multiple special sessions resulted, as chronicled in former Sen. George Scott's superb history, A Majority of One. Big tax increases. Big spending cuts. Gaping deficits. Voters weren’t happy.

Republicans were hoping that Democrats would renominate McDermott, but instead they wisely chose Pierce County Executive Booth Gardner, with deep roots in the corporate community. That November, while Reagan won 59 percent of the vote in Washington, en route to a 49 state landslide, Spellman mustered just 47 percent of the vote against Gardner.

1988: Bob Williams vs. Booth Gardner. One of two unwinnable races for the R's, meaning that no one could have won it. The economy was soaring, and Booth's favorables were sky-high. Bob Williams, the budget whiz of House Republicans, bested King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng in the Republican primary, and then had exactly nowhere to go. Gardner ran with a clunky but functional slogan: “He's made government more efficient so it can afford to be more compassionate." It worked. Booth became the only gubernatorial candidate in the last 75 years to win more than 60 percent of the vote.

1992: Mike Lowry vs. Ken Eikenberry. Mike Lowry inspired state Democrats by running an impassioned if unsuccessful race against Dan Evans for the U.S. Senate seat left open by Henry "Scoop" Jackson's untimely death in 1983 (was it really almost 30 years ago?). He tried again for the Senate against Slade Gorton in '88, but fell short, as Gorton became the first Senate candidate to win while losing King County.

Lowry decided to try once more in a statewide contest, for governor in '92. His opponent was the Fred MacMurray-like attorney general, Ken Eikenberry, who beat the moderately liberal Congressman Sid Morrison in a rancorous primary. Many people still expected Eikenberry to win. But three problems were looming. Instead of running to win, Eikenberry's campaign ran not to lose, avoiding many public appearances, even snubbing the business community by skipping the annual Association of Washington Business (AWB) gathering at Semiahmoo. Lowry, who ran an impressive, measured campaign, didn’t make that same mistake.

Second, the Seattle P-I ran a front page story trumpeting the accusation of business honcho Sam Stroum, a Lowry supporter, that someone in the Eikenberry campaign offered him a seat on the UW Board of Regents in exchange for a $50,000 donation. But who? The article, written by a reporter who had earlier worked for Lowry's campaign consultant, didn't say, and Stroum refused to answer Eikenberry's phone calls seeking an answer. Eikenberry fired back, but recklessly, attacking not Stroum or the P-I, but the UW Regents as a body, further alienating the business community.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 7:28 a.m. Inappropriate

To this conservative Demo. the reason is simply the distaste that people feel for Republican values. People want to have the right to choose,the right to come before corporate America, the right to control what is in their food, the right not to have a Palin, or Ryan close to power. Mitt Rmoney seems like a monster with a smile. People see that. Divorce yourselves from the Religious Right get over abortion restrictions(if you don't like them than don't get one) acknowledge and lead on climate change, have the guts to tell the irrational and uneducated extremists to take a walk. Than maybe you can find someone who might win. Otherwise you are what represents the mistaken past and what is and has been wrong with this country. It is that simple. I don't love Obama but he seems smart and rational. He does not ever scare me. Your guys look and act like land sharks. Obama will not ruin this country but your leaders Boener,McConnell and Cantor will try to so they can have a shot in four years. That is disgraceful,and it is why you will lose again. People see it and don't like it.

tonyg

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 8:14 a.m. Inappropriate

Which Fred MacMurray was Ken Eikenberry like? The "Double Indemnity" Fred MacMurray or the "My Three Sons" Fred MacMurray?

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 9:22 a.m. Inappropriate

John, I believe the "attractive, smart and popular KING-5 reporter Mona Lee Locke" was a KOMO-4 reporter.

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 10:38 a.m. Inappropriate

No Bob, John is right. Mona was at KING.

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 10:44 a.m. Inappropriate

An overarching reason McKenna was not elected: He offered no real difference to Inslee. McKenna's main stake in the ground, and which his TV ads (and last-minute direct mail) pounded in clearly, he's a PRO-ABORT, which the group "Mainstream Republicans" heralded as the only way to get elected. McKenna was a dismal failure in the race. Rossi, an ardent pro-lifer, had far better results. Beyond babies, McKenna was simply another politician -- voters of the state could get all that and more with Inslee who had no need to persuade us about who he REALLY is.

JohnUSA

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 11:19 a.m. Inappropriate

There's your problem in a nutshell, Carlson. You can't win with fetus fascists like JohnUSA, and you can't win without them.

ivan

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 11:05 a.m. Inappropriate

McKenna stands against Obamacare, legalizing pot, and gay marriage made him a non-starter with many young, fiscally conservative people. Kids today, by which I mean pretty much anyone under 30, just dont agree with 1950's republicans on these issues, and young people continue to be a bigger and bigger voting bloc, and, as they age, they are still pro-choice, socially liberal, even if they are fiscally conservative.

Ries

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 12:04 p.m. Inappropriate

The Washington Republicans need to be the party of personal freedom and personal responsibility. You can't be that when your candidates scold the voters that God doesn't like the voters' politics. Even a candidate like McKenna, who was not a moral warrior, can be easily cast in that light because of his party affiliation. Washington will never be a bible-thumper's paradise. To the extent that it is anti-liberal, it is libertarian. The results of the initiatives and referendums in November prove that. Leave the moralizing in the pulpit. Get to work defending people's rights, not curtailing them. That would set a reformed Republican party apart from both the current one, and the Democrats.

dbreneman

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 3:55 p.m. Inappropriate

neither party can see the forest through the trees, we pick the lessor of two evils and hope for common sense.

then add bleeding hearts, political correctness and backdoor deals and we get higher taxes, less jobs and a polluted environment.

millions of dollars were spent on the campaigns to convince us they are the one to lead our state to prosperity. don't hold your breath.

salmonjim

Posted Tue, Dec 4, 11:19 p.m. Inappropriate

At least all the millions/billions of dollars spent for all the various national political campaigns employed a great number of actual American people. I doubt many of those jobs were outsourceable, so in many ways, the mighty political campaign dollars are a huge, huge part of the GDP.

Hopefully the layoffs won't be too massive.

Posted Wed, Dec 5, 6:44 a.m. Inappropriate

Democrats have finally elected a Peter Priniciple Governor, we have a real opportunity to watch a totally unqualified Governor address the pressing issues of State via "Staff". Will the media insist on performance from this Governor? What will press conferences sound like? Soft ball questions and "Secret Sauce" based answers? You had better hope as a State that there is a cadre of handlers that actually know what they are doing, because the "lead dog" doesn't know where he is going.

Cameron

Posted Sun, Dec 9, 11:03 p.m. Inappropriate

Since when it is media's responsibility to "insist on performance"?

sarah90

Posted Wed, Dec 5, 5:46 p.m. Inappropriate

I blame those trendy and "cool" glasses McKenna started wearing.

kieth

Posted Fri, Dec 7, 3:55 p.m. Inappropriate

While John is obvious just a tinge biased, my theory on why AG McKenna lost, while John makes a good point about the old guys at the diner being in McKenna's column already, though that's one of the McKenna ads I can remember - is the effectiveness of the Inslee ad that had McKenna pandering to the "Tea Party" folks. The second-most effective ads were the ones related to taking women's rights away and, to a lesser extent, suing about Obamacare. The old guys ad seemed a bit far-fetched, disingenuous, like how much were they paid to say that, as did, to a lesser extent, the one with McKenna and his family where he agreed with them, it sounded quite staged to me...as he's outvoted for anything in the family as it is! As for historical, Governor Spellman was a bland candidate who won in 1980 due to the national events (hostage crisis, 20% interest rates). In the later 80s and beyond, the Rs ran a series of far-right candidates, including Bob Williams (then a bland Eikenberry in-between), Craswell and Carlson himself. Senator Rossi gave the look of a slick used-car salesman, not too unlike Governor Romney, and wisely kept away from the social issues, which is why he almost made it. AG McKenna almost did so as well, except for the "Tea Party" and other ads I mentioned, which suggested he was further to the right than he led on. The majority of folks apparently didn't want to take the chance. I was surprised at how big the margin was, and I am doubtful that, in the short term, the Rs can win the Governor's office as well as many other state-wide offices.

bricsa

Posted Sun, Dec 9, 11:07 p.m. Inappropriate

Did you really think those ads were not staged? The old guys were actors. McKenna's family was acting also.

Rossi was actually a slick real estate salesman.

sarah90

Posted Tue, Dec 11, 10:25 p.m. Inappropriate

Rossi may have been a real estate salesman, but he wasn't any good, slick or not.

Posted Mon, Dec 10, 1:46 a.m. Inappropriate

I loved the "old guys" ad. Kept wondering what on earth they could possibly know about small business in the 21st century, but loved the ad. Gave me one more reason not to vote for McKenna.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »