Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to William Gerberding and Paul Cavanaugh some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    The future ain't so bad, even without rose-colored glasses

    New books say our lives are a three-steps-forward, two-steps-back type of deal.

    With another year soon to end, it may be a good time to ask, is the world getting better? Are we making progress? Is it, as Jimmy Stewart annually reminds us in the holiday film classic, “a wonderful life"? Or are we on the edge of decline, the whole thing going to hell in the proverbial handbasket?

    Are we at the edge of “lift off,” or at the edge of the “cliff” (fiscal or otherwise)?

    With wars and rumors of war always with us, with Israeli/ Palestinian issues seemingly intractable, with continued gun violence and appalling shooting sprees here in the U.S., with high unemployment and fiscal uncertainty on the near horizon, it would be easy to come to the conclusion that the present is bad and the future ominous. And don’t get me started on climate change, extreme weather and garbage pileups at sea. It’s bad, bad, bad.

    Not so say a series of recent books, whose authors contend that, by many measures, enormous progress has been made in the last several decades, both in the U.S. and worldwide.

    The latest contribution to the genre of optimism is Steven Johnson’s book Future Perfect: The Case for Progress in a Networked Age. That book’s key themes were summarized in Johnson’s recent article, “We’re Living the Dream — We Just Don’t Realize It.” 

    Here’s Johnson: “Over the past two decades, what have the U.S. trends been for the following important measures of social health: high school dropout rates, college enrollment, juvenile crime, drunken driving, traffic deaths, infant mortality, life expectancy, per capita gasoline consumption, workplace injuries, air pollution, divorce, male-female wage equality, charitable giving, voter turnout, per capita GDP and teen pregnancy?

    “The answer for all of them is the same: The trend is positive. Almost all those varied metrics of social wellness have improved by more than 20 percent over the past two decades. And that's not counting the myriad small wonders of modern medicine that have improved our quality of life as well as our longevity: the anti-depressants and insulin pumps and quadruple bypasses.”

    Take just one of these areas: divorce. Johnson notes how often people say, in ominous tones, “Half of all marriages end in divorce.” Turns out that hasn’t been true since the early 80’s. Today it’s more like one-third of marriages that end in divorce. That’s a big change and a good one.

    Seattle too has positive trend lines in a host of social indicators including: crime statistics (down), recycling plastic (up), overall garbage reduction, increased units of affordable housing, the numbers of people getting exercise by walking and cycling, as well as increases in things as diverse as the number of trees in the city and the number of Seattleites who volunteer.

    But we miss a lot of these big changes and positive developments, claims Johnson. They don’t seem to register with us. Why? Are we addicted to bad news?

    Another work with a similar argument is Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think by Peter H. Diamandis and Steven Kotler. Diamandis and Kotler take a more global view of our situation, again arguing that by many measures the present is improved, while the future offers abundant reasons for optimism. And they place particular emphasis on technological developments that enable human beings to deal with intractable problems as never before.

    A still earlier 2004 entry into this mix was from New Republic Editor Gregg Easterbrook, The Progress Paradox: How Life Gets Better and Better While People Feel Worse. Like Johnson and Diamandis/Kolter, Easterbrook tracks the many objective measures of health, well-being and prosperity that have been moving in the right direction, but then wonders why, if that’s the case, so many people seem to believe that things are getting worse?

    When it comes to the doctrine of progress and what some call the “official religion of America,” optimism, I confess that I tend to be a doubter. I am, it seems, disposed to skepticism about claims of “better and better,” or overwhelming confidence in our capacity to solve all our problems.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Fri, Dec 14, 8:08 a.m. Inappropriate

    I think that one of the contributing factors to the "Ain't It Awful" club is the amount of money, time, and media coverage, we as a nation, spend on defense. It's hard to escape the world is going to hell in a hand basket feelings when both major political parties loudly support a very large military and the major stories in the media are about what we should do in places like Syria. The results are a cycle of bad news with bad people out to get us, so arm up and stop them someplace other then here.


    Posted Fri, Dec 14, 11:37 a.m. Inappropriate

    It's curious that a self-styled religious leader should find himself confused and ambivalent about identifying with the material world. For what it's worth, every spiritual philosophy of any consequence starts from the premise that the soul's progress depends on the ability to withdraw from the ego's naive addiction to physical pleasure -- in other words, rejecting the false identification of the true self with the body. As he himself asks, "What's Tony thinking?"


    Posted Mon, Dec 17, 10:07 p.m. Inappropriate

    The inference of there being fewer divorces is that people in marriages are happier. I'd discount this, in part - especially lately - of economic circumstances. Folks may not be able to afford to split, it is a complicated and can be messy process, and both parties may have decided that it's more convenient to stay together. See the movie "Hope Springs" for an example that's fairly common. In some of the cases where two people stay together, they may be better off to split...if they can afford to.


    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »