Best of 2012: Time to stop snubbing the suburbs?

The notion of a "suburb" is history. Diversity, greater density, more shopping and transportation choices are all part of the new identities of the communities around Seattle.
The mixed-use Bravern development includes Microsoft office towers, linked courtyards, and high-end retail.

The mixed-use Bravern development includes Microsoft office towers, linked courtyards, and high-end retail. Payton Chung/Flickr (CC)

An elevator at Mountlake Terrace's transit center at the edge of a newly emerging town center.

An elevator at Mountlake Terrace's transit center at the edge of a newly emerging town center. Atomic Taco/Flicker (CC)

Editors' note: Each day during the holidays, Crosscut is presenting two of the top stories from the past year on subjects that our writers regularly cover. Today, we are looking at some of the urban affairs and architecture stories. Please check the "Related Stories" box on each story for more of the best work by our writers in 2012. This article was originally published Feb. 28.

Several weeks ago I sat in a seminar on the development of suburbs in a national conference on Smart Growth. As is the case with these kinds of meetings, a series of people present their own community as a case study. I observed the eyes of an attendee from a small town near Des Moines, Iowa glaze over when a planner from Bellevue zipped through PowerPoint slides of that city’s glistening towers. I think it's probably time to stop referring to Bellevue as a suburb.

It occurs to me that the very term “suburb” may have outlived its usefulness. In an earlier era, when large, mature cities were surrounded by expansive subdivisions and shopping malls, this might have reflected a definite distinction. In those times, “bedroom suburbs” lived up their name as nighttime havens of mostly white families, often with a stay-at-home mother and a commuting father. Those were your grandfather’s suburbs.

Today, in many parts of the country and certainly Puget Sound, the pattern — both physically and demographically — is quite different. In less than a century, the average family size has halved. The largest portion of American households fall into the categories of singles, childless couples, and seniors. And vast swaths of formerly “whitebread” suburbs are a now made up of a widely varied ethnic and racial soup. Sometimes the result has been startling.

Auburn, 10 miles south of downtown Seattle, is home to a population of Ukrainian families so substantial as to support their own brand spanking new supermarket. Walking through the clean and commodious aisles of Marvel foods, one barely hears any English being spoken. Customers jostle the sumptuous bread counter stuffed with dark loaves, while a few yards away diners are slurping down big spoonfuls of borsch from the take out counter. Precisely in the style of American capitalism, the store grew  from a cramped storefront to occupy its own custom-designed structure.

Almost while we weren’t looking, towns around Seattle have acquired a range of people, goods, and services that belies the idea of the snooty, isolated, and exclusionary suburb of popular and professional literature. For a while, there was a gap politically, as the old guard of elected leaders presided over newcomers who were busy trying to figure out how to get their kids to school and run a business. Now, people of many different cultural backgrounds occupy positions on city councils, planning commissions, and other elected and appointed decision-making boards. This has essentially happened in less than 20 years — not even a generation.

Jobs are not just located in Seattle anymore, nor even in downtown Bellevue. They are found throughout the region and over time many people have tried to locate where they need not spend hours on the freeway. Our regional network of trains, express buses, and local buses has also allowed people to make choices that they didn’t have before. Not long ago, most new immigrants had little choice but to work and live in Seattle.

The very term suburb implies a we/they, superior/inferior type of thinking. As if there were only two models: urban and not. In fact, the multiple variations of urbanity are what make a region both vital and interesting. Although we still have a dominant central city, we also now have dozens of places that are wonderful in their own right and offer people lots of different choices.

And people are finding those choices and making them even more diverse and, yes, dense. Virtually every town in the region has been busy making its own center more interesting, more lively, filled with more public spaces and varied shops and restaurants. There has been a gradual erosion in the old fear of density with the realization that people do appreciate having choices rather than hewing to the old attitude that detached houses were the only acceptable form of housing. Many people understand now that having lots of people living close together supports local shops and services.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Dec 26, 1:08 p.m. Inappropriate

I'd prefer it if suburban zoning became a thing of the past. Towns, small cities and cities, each with jobs, homes, schools and cultural amenities, would be healthier for families and the environment in our region. I believe Germany developed after WWII in this fashion, where they both surrounded the population nodes with open space, and linked by rail. Question is: How to recapture and enforce open space and farms between them? Our private property rights and municipal competition make it very difficult.

Posted Wed, Dec 26, 2:59 p.m. Inappropriate

I think the term 'suburban' is still relevant when one considers most of these people, while living in 'walkable' communities, still get into their cars and drive to work in another part of Puget Sound.

Until these nodes of habitation are truly connected with mass transit, these people are living mostly suburban lifestyles. The residents may be able to stroll over to a restaurant or such, but most still drive to work.

The author proposes that "our regional network of trains, express buses, and local buses has also allowed people to make choices that they didn’t have before" but this is still quite limited in the grand scheme of things.

jeffro

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »