Coal Train, Part Two: An insider's guide to the coal port's environmental review
Different agencies, different laws and lots of science and partisan passion will collide before we know the fate of Gateway Pacific.
(Page 2 of 2)
As for topical expansion, since climate change has returned to the world agenda and since coal is a major contributor to climate change, including Gateway's impacts on this phenomenon in the EIS could have global implications.
In like manner, the breadth of scientific studies widens if environmental reviews expand beyond Gateway Pacific’s thousand-acre site at Cherry Point. The impact of more shipping on whale migrations and the dangers of collisions or spills in the San Juan Islands are just a few of the issues opponents have raised. Onshore, opponents point to BNSF’s massive coal trains all along the shipping route, demanding health studies about the impact of diesel emissions, coal dust and safety.
SSA Marine, its partners and supporters would prefer that the EIS stay limited to the site itself. The group opposes linking GPT to other coal port proposals in the region, such as Millennium. BNSF is sure to make the point that interstate commerce is governed by federal law and a federal agency with wide jurisdiction over railroads.
The multi-year process to determine whether and how the Gateway Pacific Terminal gets built will be fraught with all kinds of legal, logistical, political and environmental intrigue and peril. But in the end, we will have a decision.
In Part Three of this series, coming tomorrow, we examine the critical question: Who Decides.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Jan 23, 12:10 p.m. Inappropriate
I think the owners of the vast majority of the coal deposits in the US should think long term and demand changes in our outdated mining laws before we get too far down this 'give it to China' syndrome road.
How much does the Federal Government get per ton on average for the coal it gives companies like Peabody to mine?
What will that be worth in 20 or 100 years?
When diesel fuel becomes expensive to produce from oil, will coal>diesel plants become our next big thing in providing for our enormous appetite for carbon based energy? http://www.greencarcongress.com/2012/08/usf-20120822.html
I'm not too worried about 100 stevedore jobs here or there, when the stakes are so high elsewhere.
Posted Wed, Jan 23, 10 p.m. Inappropriate
You should be more worried about the impacts to the global climate and ocean acidification if we continue to emit CO2 at current rates.
Posted Thu, Jan 24, 11:55 a.m. Inappropriate
Answer: The coal companies pay a 12.5% royalty on the coal "at the mine mouth" or about $1.25 to $1.50 per ton, plus their leasing fees to strip mine the PRB lands, typically less (often much less) than $1.00 per ton. After some small adjustments, these fees and royalties are divided 50-50 between the feds, on the one hand, and Montana or Wyoming, on the other.
Posted Wed, Jan 23, 1:58 p.m. Inappropriate
A little historical perspective is needed here. Until the middle of the 20th century US prosperity was based primarily on exploiting an abundance of natural resources without the limitation or expense of a complex regulatory regime. Then for a short period the US had a vibrant manufacturing economy whose remarkable wealth creation was sufficient to support the luxurious costs of a regulatory scheme that mitigated (to some degree) the adverse impacts attendant to its generation.
But now we are coming full circle. Local manufacturing is disappearing and we are returning to our origins as a Third World resource economy. Except that we still retain the absurd regulatory burdens of our prior golden age. This unnecessary administrative superstructure is outmoded and will have to go. It is well known that Third World economies only generate enough wealth to provide a comfortable living to those at the very top. Plus one really has to wonder how long our Chinese masters will want to put up with this inefficient crap. There inevitably will be a limit to their renowned patience and benevolence. If the citizens of Beijing can adapt to wearing gas masks as they go about their daily lives, why can't we?
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.