Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Julie Young and James Wendell some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

The Daily Troll: Local sheriff puts cops in schools. Wanted: savvy pothead. No Blue Angels at Seafair?!

Snohomish County's sheriff wants to put more officers in schools. The state looks to fill a position with someone who might well flunk a drug test.
The Daily Troll: News for your evening commute.

The Daily Troll: News for your evening commute. Art work by Noel Franklin

Cops in schools

On a day when Congress began hearing testimony on gun safety, Snohomish County Sheriff John Lovick decided to put five deputies in Snohomish schools — as a safety measure. This according to The Herald in Everett. Lovick says that the decision will stretch his budget, but he's determined to make it happen and he's looking to local corporations to help cover the cost. The former Democratic state legislator and one of the region's really fine public servants, told reporter Sharon Salyer, "Nothing has impacted me more than Sandy Hook. Some nights I can't sleep thinking about it." (For Gabby Giffords' gun control and school safety testimony today, see below.)

No more Blue Angels?

Speaking of Everett, the Navy wants local communities to know how they'll be affected if Congress fails to resolve the current budget issues. The prospect of automatic "sequestration" cuts under the existing budget agreements would presumably hit Everett, Bremerton and Whidbey Island. One Northwest impact: Seafair might lose the Navy Blue Angels, according to a report by KIRO Radio and MyNorthwest journalist Linda Thomas. Mark Trahant, the former Seattle Post-Intelligencer editorial page editor, wrote in Indian Country Today this morning that sequestration threatens to devastate Native American higher education institutions. (The Tulalip and other tribes have been working to develop higher education programs in recent years.) Discussions about cutbacks in numerous other areas are just beginning.

State pot job: Experience preferred? 

The Liquor Control Board today reserved a convention center hall in Tacoma to take questions from dozens of people hoping to bid for a contract as its adviser "on all things weed," as an Associated Press report puts it. As to qualifications and experience, AP reported this exchange from the meeting: 

Rose Habib, analytical chemist from a marijuana testing lab in Missoula, Montana: "Since it's not unlikely with this audience, would a felony conviction preclude you from this contract?"

John Farley, procurement coordinator with the LCB: It depends. A pot-related conviction is probably fine; a "heinous felony," not so much.

We're #1! We're #1!

Washington State ranks No. 1 in the unfairness of its tax burdens on lower and moderate income people. So finds a new report from the Washington State Budget & Policy Center. Our top ranking comes from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which has rated Washington worst in the share of taxes paid by those with lower levels of income for four straight years. If this were a sports competition where states scored points for favoring the rich, we'd be a dynasty! And we'd bet (since sports and betting go together, especially in Super Bowl week) that the Senate Majority Coalition will do its part to preserve our standing. 

The institute notes that the states with low taxes are often the ones with the worst disparities between rich and poor. That may be true for some other "Terrible 10" states in the rankings, such as South Dakota, Arizona and Alabama. But Washington? We don't even get the (debatable) consolation of low taxes.

Giffords to Congress: do something about guns

Former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords opened the congressional testimony on gun control today. Guns are not just a national issue, but a local and state issue across the country. Giffords, the victim of gun violence herself, and her husband Mark Kelly are calling for action on gun control. Will Congress take the couple seriously and take some reasonable steps to prevent gun violence? Or will it let politics stall the discussion of sensible new laws that personal experience has taught Giffords and Kelly can help? 

 Love the Daily Troll? Now you can sign up to get it in your inbox every afternoon.

Joe Copeland is political editor for Crosscut. You can reach him at Joe.Copeland@crosscut.com.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Jan 30, 6:53 p.m. Inappropriate

Apropos Washington's viciously oppressive tax burden on those of us in the bottom socioeconomic 20 percent, it is pie-in-the-sky absurd to imagine there is any possibility for relief, now or at any time in the foreseeable future.

Not only is there the obstruction posed by the RepublicanRatic coup in the Senate, insurmountable at least until 2014, and probably -- given the inevitable backlash to the Obamacrat forcible-disarmament campaign (remember how Clinton's comparable effort reanimated the GOP in 1994) -- for many years thereafter. There is also Initiative 1185, which permanently prohibits any and all state-level tax reform, ensuring the most vindictively regressive tax structure in the United States will remain so forever.

To understand why this tax structure prevails -- and why it will never be changed -- it is necessary to recognize it for what it truly is: another form of gentrification, a more generalized version of the soocioeconomic bigotry expressed by the malicious downsizing of mass transit, as in Tacoma and Pierce County. In other words it is a classic expression of the red-state savagery Washington so carefully conceals beneath its deliberately misleading blue-state facade.

Posted Thu, Jan 31, 9:31 a.m. Inappropriate

No more Blue Angels?! Whoopee!!!!

No more nerve wracking, ear splitting damage to children & animals...& adults.

No more testosterone show offs.

Good bye & good riddance!!!!!!!

Brooknook

Posted Thu, Jan 31, 2:15 p.m. Inappropriate

Posted here in error, hence deleted.

Posted Fri, Feb 1, 2:29 a.m. Inappropriate

Poor folks spend 16.9% in state and local taxes? Really? There is no tax on rent nor on groceries which are the principal expenses for poor people. Most spend more than half their income on these two untaxed areas.

The sales tax on other items is 10% or less.

Joe, ask these people for their calculations. Maybe they're manipulating data to promote an agenda, or maybe they just lie.

simorgh

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »