Seattle's female business leaders dole out mentorship advice
Guest opinion: Young female professionals are still struggling toward equitable pay and representation in leadership positions. Fancy a mentor?
For Valentines Day this year, my parents sent me a pile of childhood photos, which they know I love exploring. As I flipped through the stack, I landed on the picture below. Nine-year-old Tamara, standing next to her mother who, on that day, was graduating from Eastern Washington University with a BA in Education.
This was a big moment for my mom, who had dropped out of high school and become a runaway at the age of 13. A GED, a certificate in carpentry, a low income women’s carpentry startup, two years in the Peace Corps, a marriage to my father and three children later, she held a diploma in one hand and me — her mentee — in the other.
The week I started kindergarten, my mother started her BA program at EWU. We brought our homework home each night and studied together. Perhaps because of this, there was no doubt in my mind that I would one day go to college. When she spent six months in Lesotho working on her doctoral dissertation during my sophomore year of college, there was no doubt in my mind that I would one day get an advanced degree, or that I would travel the globe. I wasn’t told that I should do these things, I wasn’t pressured. Rather, I was mentored daily by an incredible woman.
As the organizer of Friday's Young Professionals International Network Speed Mentorship event, I’ve been meeting for coffee and chatting on the phone with dozens of trailblazing, ass-kicking, Seattle based female leaders. They’ve had fascinating stories to share of the women that helped or hindered them along their way, the opportunities and roadblocks encountered, and the kind of mentors they hope to be for future female leaders.
Some have asked why women’s mentorship should be any different than men’s mentorship. The truth is, it shouldn’t be. But it is.
Barbara Standal, one of the event's Speed Mentors, reflected on her 1970s education: “I would have loved to have some women mentors, but I was one out of eight women in a law program of 100.” Standal wouldn’t have her first female mentor until she began working as a lawyer for the U.S. government years later, and even then her mentors were women at her same level. “I’ve had women heroes, but mostly from a distance. For a long time it was a man’s world, and it was hard for women to get together.”
Now, women make up close to half of law school students, 31.9 percent of all lawyers, and comprise over half of management, professional, and related professions according to one Catalyst study. If we can muster up the courage to ask them, we have access to “binders full” of female mentors, and even more female heroes.
And yet, only 11 out of over 180 countries have elected women heads of state and the National Committee on Pay Equity reports that U.S. women are still earning only 77 percent of what men earn. In Washington state this adds up to a $500,000 loss for a typical woman over her 40-year career. In Fortune 500 companies men still represent 96.6 percent of CEOs, 92.5 percent of top earners, 85.9 percent of executive officers and 83.9 percent of board members. And women make up only 18.1 percent of the 535 seats in the 113th U.S. Congress.
When will female mentorship become comparable to male mentorship? When our fields are influenced and led by comparable numbers of women and men and the wage gap has been eliminated.
I won't say it’s the silver bullet, but a little mentorship can go a long way. “It’s nerve racking to put yourself out there, and most people don’t like networking,” said Melody Biringer, founder of the Crave Company. Still, she says, “all you need is the X and the Y, and someone else will bring the Z.”
It can help to share mutual connections, but, as Martina Welke, founder of Zealyst, told me, “If there isn’t a connection available, don’t be afraid to reach out directly.” Welke always makes time to meet with people interested in startups or technology, particularly if they’ve taken the time to learn about her company and have prepared informed questions. “A great initial conversation helps build a strong foundation for long-term mentorship.”
“It can be scary and you will feel vulnerable, but, ask yourself, ‘What could it hurt?’” advised Autumn Lerner, Group Manager at Weber Shandwick. “I sincerely believe that human beings want to support each other. It feels good to be a guide, a coach, a mentor, and it is an honor to be asked. So embrace your fear and let it be your guide.”
Chances are good your mentor is also mentoring others in the community. “You might meet with them once a month or twice a year, but make the most of the opportunity and be grateful,” Lerner suggested. Be honest with your mentor about your challenges and goals. “I mean, really, how can your mentor truly support you if they don’t know what you really want?”
Mentorship is a dynamic process, as both mentors and mentees will inevitably change, “So the relationship should evolve to accommodate that,” Welke notes.
These relationships often become mutually beneficial. Serena Cosgrove explained that, as a professor at Seattle University, she has many opportunities to mentor young people, “But now, my former students are mentoring and helping me. Former students now working on issues of international development are great resources for my research and current students.”
In fact, one of the surest ways to find a mentor is to become a mentor yourself. Be it advising a co-worker, taking an active interest in an employee, meeting with a college student to help them make career choices or reaching out to a child in your family or community. You can’t know what the ultimate impact of these efforts will be, for your mentee or yourself.
Eleanor Roosevelt famously wrote that “What you are in life results in great part from the influence exerted on you over the years by just a few people.” Which explains why I’m so looking forward to this Speed Mentorship event: 35 young female professionals and 35 leadership level women just may walk away with one of those few people.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Mar 7, 12:29 p.m. Inappropriate
Re: "the National Committee on Pay Equity reports that U.S. women are still earning only 77 percent of what men earn"
I expect that committee to continue for the next 100 years implying that women are discriminated against. That keeps those membership dues coming in.
Here is just one of many reasons women average lower pay than men:
“In 2011, 22% of male physicians and 44% of female physicians worked less than full time, up from 7% of men and 29% of women from Cejka’s 2005 survey.” http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/03/26/bil10326.htm
Mind you, these are some of the most sophisticated, educated women in the country CHOOSING to earn less than their male counterparts in the exact same profession.
A thousand laws won't close that gap.
In fact, no law yet has closed the gender wage gap — not the 1963 Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, not Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, not the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, not affirmative action (which has benefited mostly white women, the group most vocal about the wage gap - http://tinyurl.com/74cooen), not the 1991 amendments to Title VII, not the 1991 Glass Ceiling Commission created by the Civil Rights Act, not the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act, not diversity, not the countless state and local laws and regulations, not the thousands of company mentors for women, not the horde of overseers at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and not the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.... Nor will a "paycheck fairness" law work.
That's because women's pay-equity advocates, who always insist one more law is needed, continue to overlook the effects of female AND male behavior:
Despite the 40-year-old demand for women's equal pay, millions of wives still choose to have no pay at all. In fact, according to Dr. Scott Haltzman, author of "The Secrets of Happily Married Women," stay-at-home wives, including the childless who represent an estimated 10 percent, constitute a growing niche. "In the past few years,” he says in a CNN report at http://tinyurl.com/6reowj, “many women who are well educated and trained for career tracks have decided instead to stay at home.” (“Census Bureau data show that 5.6 million mothers stayed home with their children in 2005, about 1.2 million more than did so a decade earlier....” at http://tinyurl.com/qqkaka. If indeed a higher percentage of women is staying at home, perhaps it's because feminists and the media have told women for years that female workers are paid less than men in the same jobs — so why bother working if they're going to be penalized and humiliated for being a woman.)
As full-time mothers or homemakers, stay-at-home wives earn zero. How can they afford to do this while in many cases living in luxury? Answer: Because they're supported by their husband, an “employer” who pays them to stay at home. (Far more wives are supported by a spouse than are husbands.)
The implication of this is probably obvious to most 12-year-olds but seems incomprehensible to or is ignored by feminists and the liberal media: If millions of wives are able to accept NO wages, millions of other wives, whose husbands' incomes vary, are more often able than husbands to:
-accept low wages
-refuse overtime and promotions
-choose jobs based on interest first, wages second — the reverse of what men tend to do
-take more unpaid days off
-avoid uncomfortable wage-bargaining (http://tinyurl.com/3a5nlay)
-work part-time instead of full-time (“In 2011, 22% of male physicians and 44% of female physicians worked less than full time, up from 7% of men and 29% of women from Cejka’s 2005 survey.” These are some of the most sophisticated, educated women in the country CHOOSING to earn less than their male counterparts in the exact same profession. http://tinyurl.com/7la747z)
Any one of these job choices lowers women's median pay relative to men's. And when a wife makes one of the choices, her husband often must take up the slack.
Women are able to make these choices because they are supported — or, if unmarried, anticipate being supported — by a husband who must earn more than if he'd chosen never to marry. (Still, even many men who shun marriage, unlike their female counterparts, feel their self worth is tied to their net worth.) This is how MEN help create the wage gap: as a group they tend more than women to pass up jobs that interest them for ones that pay well.
Note: To my knowledge, unemployed stay-at-home wives are not factored into women's average wage. Shouldn't they should be? Since they voluntarily work for zero wages, factoring them in -- assigning each zero earnings -- would perhaps give a more realistic measure of women's average wage.
Much more in "Will the Ledbetter Act Help Women?" at http://malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/will-the-ledbetter-fair-pay-act-help-women/
Posted Fri, Mar 8, 5:39 p.m. Inappropriate
Except in chemical engineering, half the women who graduate with an engineering degree do not have a job or career in their field. It's not because of child raising. Women who don't have children are not doing any better. There is chronic uneemployment and underemployment among women with advanced degrees in all fields of science. Sorry to rain on the parade, but there still is a great deal of mail chauvinism to overcome.
Posted Fri, Mar 8, 11:30 p.m. Inappropriate
Oh brother. Women who decide to go out and get what they want can always beat men. Or else become head of the DOT.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.