State House Democrats at risk of failing on gun check bill
The bill's main sponsor, Seattle Democrat Jamie Pedersen, says he doesn't have enough support lined up for it to pass yet. But Gov. Jay Inslee talked with members urging votes for the measure.
Tom James/Crosscut
Gov. Jay Inslee lobbied personally on behalf a proposal for universal background checks of gun purchasers toward becoming law, but the House Democratic leadership wasn't prepared to take a vote on Monday.
Inslee visited the chambers of the state House of Representatives early Monday to lend his weight to gathering votes for the measure. Of the 50 votes necessary to send the bill to the Senate, 47 were lined up as of the governor's visit, according to the bill's sponsor, Seattle Democratic Rep. Jamie Pedersen.
After spending time in private offices on the Democratic side of the chambers, the governor then headed onto the floor, to talk with Rep. Maureen Walsh, a Walla Walla Republican. After Inslee finished with Walsh, House Republican leader Rep. Richard DeBolt of Chehalis stopped by Walsh's desk.
House Speaker Frank Chopp and the Democrats have a solid 55-to-43 majority but they apparently have a number of their own members unwilling to support the measure. it appeared that they were unwilling to bring the bill to a vote without assurance that they would win. After hours of suspense, the Democrats gave up on efforts to schedule a vote for Monday. But the House still has Tuesday and Wednesday to pass the bill.
The measure would close the so-called gun show loophole by requiring that anybody selling a gun get a state background check on the buyer. Currently only licensed gun dealers are required to get the checks. Under the proposal, failing to get the check would be a crime on the part of the seller.
The measure has had some bipartisan support from the beginning, with Republican Rep. Mike Hope of Lake Stevens joining Pedersen as a co-sponsor. But lobbying heated up as the bill moved toward a vote by the whole House. Shortly before the public hearing for the bill, the National Rifle Association sent out mailers in Hope's district, and a spokesman for the organization went on the record saying that the measure was intended to create a government list of gun owners. Soon after, however, another gun rights lobby — the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms — joined the sponsors of the initiative in working to improve the bill.
Pedersen said he changed parts of the bill not only to suit that group, but also in response to requests from police in the state, who asked that law officers be exempt.
Other than the 47 confirmed votes, Pedersen said six were on the fence, and that the bill might very well see a floor vote today. The bill needs a one-vote majority to pass in the House, or three more votes of the six.
Even if the bill clears the House, it faces a tough road in the Senate, where it would likely be sent to the Law and Justice Committee. The chair of that committee, Spokane Republican Sen. Mike Padden, used common procedural maneuvers to block five moderate gun safety bills earlier in the session. After that hearing Padden refused to comment on the fate of Pedersen's bill, should it make it to the Senate. Instead he would only say that any gun control bill that came to his committee would have "a tough row to hoe."
If the bill couldn't clear Law and Justice, its only hope would be invocation of a seldom-used procedural maneuver where a majority of legislators can force a vote on any bill, even those that died in committee.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Tue, Mar 12, 11:16 a.m. Inappropriate
The state has serious economic and budget issues that are making it very difficult to address pressing health, transportation, education, and infrastructure issues.
These "gun safety" measures, if one actually reads the bills or follows the sessions, are mostly flawed, feel good legislation. Feel good in the sense that they would have little practical affect on the issues that they supposedly address. It would be far better to concentrate on actual enforcement of the state and federal laws already on the books.
As for this bill, the efforts of the gun rights advocates were focused upon expanding the background checks in return for the removal of a state paper trail that constituted a de facto registry. The records are created as part of the background check process There was no express intent at the time of passage of the original legislation that the records would be permanent.
The efforts at compromise fell apart when a major statewide police chiefs' organization refused to go along citing their repeated use of this non-database database. It should be noted that this organization, and many others like it, are dominated by police chiefs. These chiefs are accountable, as appointees, to mayors and city councils. Many sheriffs, who are generally popularly elected, had no problem with the deal.
The Democrats have found a logical singularity upon which to promote their gun control agenda. Apparently they were not happy to just let the Republicans look stupid, bogged down in their own fallacies of thought.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.