Scouting is about to make a leap forward

And that will leave one more important step to take. Soon.

My church, the Magnolia United Church of Christ in Seattle, has conflicting legacies. It has been an open, affirming church accepting of gay people for decades. It has had several leaders that are gay.

It has also been the sponsor of Boy Scout Troop 80 and Cub Scout Pack 80 since the 1940s.

The Boy Scouts, however, have been embroiled in a bitter controversy regarding the participation of gays and lesbians. The official, national policy does not permit participation by homosexuals. In 2000, on a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court ruled that the ban was permissible. Last year, the BSA reaffirmed that policy.

Curiously, since the beginning of this year, the debate has reopened. The 1,400 voting members of the national council will take action on the issue this month. It is an issue that threatens to rip the organization in two.

To its credit, the organization (for which my wife works) has gone to great lengths to listen to its membership. Scouting surveyed 1.1 million sponsors, leaders, parents, and alumni. Beginning in February, town hall meetings were held at more than 250 local councils. Discussions were held with other youth leaders, donors, and experts in youth protection and safety.

Scouting is a 100-year old organization for boys. Its mission is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes. In 2012, there were 2.7 million Scouts and over a million adult leaders.

Religious groups sponsor about 70 percent of Scout troops. Many of the sponsors are opposed to including gays. Sixteen percent of Scouts are in Mormon units. Another 7 percent are affiliated with the Catholic Church. Many Scouting units are sponsored by the Baptist faith.

This composition is reflected in the BSA’s research. Beliefs about gays and lesbians are mixed—and changing.

  • Scouting parents narrowly oppose the current policy of excluding gays and lesbians by a 3 percent margin—a radical shift from three years ago when the support for exclusion was 58-29 percent.
  • A large majority of adult leaders continue to support the exclusion.
  • A majority of Scouts and teens oppose exclusion.
  • Overwhelming majorities strongly agree that it is unacceptable to deny an openly gay Scout an Eagle Scout Award based on his sexuality.

BSA’s research also found that the nearly universal opinion among sexual abuse authorities is that same-sex sexual interest or experience is not a risk factor for sexually abusing children. Research, according to the BSA report, also clearly indicates that having homosexual parents has no apparent effect on children’s adjustment, mental health, or sexual orientation — strongly suggesting that Scouting leaders would not either.

Scouting’s Executive Committee has proposed a resolution that states that “No youth may be denied membership in the Boy Scouts of America on the basis of sexual orientation or preference alone.” But no changes regarding adults are proposed.

For our congregation, Scouting’s ban on gays has been troubling. Since 1996, the church has been open and affirming, and there has been a strong belief in welcoming all.

The Cub Scout Pack 80 and Boy Scout Troop 80 sponsored by the church have been among the strongest units in the local district. The Troop has produced 126 Eagle Scouts.

In light of recent developments, we began a discussion between the troop, the pack, and the church. Curiously, not many remembered what our own actions on this policy had been.

After the 2000 Supreme Court decision supporting the right of the BSA to exclude gays, according to former Scoutmaster Doug Johnson, the parent committees voted to oppose this decision and circulated a letter to parents. In 2003, the national United Church of Christ passed a resolution in opposition to the BSA policy. Our Troop Committee sent a copy to the Chief Seattle Council reiterating our open policy.

Both the Pack and the Troop leaders have confirmed that its open policies have continued. Everyone is welcome in Boy Scout Troop 80 and Cub Scout Pack 80.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


Posted Mon, May 6, 12:16 p.m. Inappropriate

Big thanks to you Tom for your service and leadership. In the past I have had the opportunity to counsel Troop 80 Scouts for merit badges and supervise the Eagle service projects of several Troop 80 boys as well. These are outstanding young people who are now living out Scouting values of service and leadership in their adult lives. Like you, former Scoutmaster Doug Johnson did a superb job of leading the troop (and parents) during these challenges and I consider Troop 80 on the vanguard of what Scouting in the U.S.A. can become. I have been to gatherings of Scouts at the international level going back 35 years - there is enormous diversity within the Scouting movement worldwide. Tolerance and understanding, celebration of diversity, and unity around the shared purpose of Scouting as a service organization is the hallmark that brings people together in Scouting. I know that BSA national board members from (or with strong ties to) our community are very aware and supportive of fully inclusive and supportive policies like those championed by Troop 80. Your taking the high road is brave and initially lonely, but its made a bit easier because you are doing the right thing. We're going to get there, thanks for doing a good turn daily!


Posted Mon, May 6, 3:58 p.m. Inappropriate

If it suppose to be nobody's business whom a person loves or has sex with.
Mind your own business. Why do "others" always have to change "their" policies to suit you. Who died and made you God??? Let the Boy Scouts make the decision with out your Liberal BS.


Posted Mon, May 13, 8:11 p.m. Inappropriate

Easy tjp, Tom is not trying to take the "God" role away from you, your reign is still intact.

But I do have to thank you tjp, your eloquent decree to advise your subjects to 'mind thy own business' is certainly heeded. I was so naive to think I should have a say in a policy at an organization that I have volunteered hundreds of hours to. How liberal of me to think the BSA exists only because of the millions of volunteers who actually make scouting possible...not the relatively few old guys heading the organization that get paid +$1M for setting policies...I deserve to be stoned for this thinking.

But oh so sovereign one, may I be so bold to ask how does this policy change affect you?

I can tell you that if the policy does change, it won't affect my boys in the best it allows some of their friends and families to join in scouting whose outdated policies have prevented them from participating in the past.


Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »