Kind of smart, at least for a big city
Seattleites have a superiority streak when it comes to the city, but we've admittedly received some validation over the years. Just this year studies have ranked us the second best American city to live in, the second healthiest, and the best city outside Texas to find a good job. However, if a report by brain game company Lumosity is to be believed, we’re also dumber than 38 other U.S. cities. Ranked above us are Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, and thirty-five others (not Portland, don’t worry).
Knowing there must be some mistake in these findings, we contacted Dr. Daniel Sternberg, the data scientist at Lumosity who conducted the study, which is based on performance in cognitive training exercises. Many of the highest scoring cities were smaller and had colleges, so we asked if limited population sizes helped.
Larger metros do tend to come out lower, Sternberg confirmed. “It's worth noting that among the largest 50 metros, Seattle comes in at No. 8,” he said. This ranks Seattle above San Francisco and Denver, and he noted we’ve also gained since last year.
McGinn's version of broadband
When it comes to throwing political weight around, The Seattle Times isn’t shy about being obvious — see the paper’s advertising scheme for Rob McKenna last year. But sometimes they’re less upfront about it than others.
This past week the paper used an editorial to bash Mayor Mike McGinn over his promise to expand broadband coverage in the city, and took some misleading or misinformed potshots. Some claims, like a few neighborhood wi-fi hotspots being “the closest thing to broadband-for-all”, are so wrong they don’t dignify a response. However, the editorial primarily criticizes McGinn for not asking taxpayers to foot the bill for a citywide broadband network.
In light of the announcement that D.C.-based Gigabit Squared will launch high-speed broadband throughout Seattle as part of a deal with the city, we wanted to give McGinn’s office the chance to respond. Spokesman Robert Cruickshank states “the cost to build (citywide broadband) was estimated at $700 million in taxpayer dollars,” which would have required the City Council to approve a ballot measure on the proposal. Rather than engage in that inevitable slugfest, McGinn tested whether the private market would invest in building out the city’s existing fiber network. The gambit appears to be paying off, with Cruickshank pointing out that under the current deal with Gigabit Squared, taxpayers will bear no risk or costs.
Gigabit: We can deliver
The Seattle Times aren’t the only ones discounting news of gigabit internet coming to Seattle. Some current Internet providers aren’t sure what to make of the news either.
As it stands, Gigabit Squared has announced plans to offer 100mbps connections for $45 a month, and 1000mbps connections for $85/month. The service will cover 14 neighborhoods — including a number that are currently underserved in Southeast Seattle — and would make for some of the fastest consumer internet in America.
However, skepticism remains over whether they can deliver, or if this is the equivalent of the Springfield monorail. Given Gigabit Squared has never built something like this, some local providers are opining that it's all hype at this point, or implying the company won’t be able to deliver the speeds they promise. In response, President Mark Ansboury tells us these claims are misguided, saying Gigabit staffers have 25 years of experience building out such networks. “Gigabit to the premise is both feasible and practical,” Ansboury said.
Our word cloud lacks roses
This may come as a shock, but people believe there are too many frat types in Fremont and Belltown, and too many hipsters in Capitol Hill.
These and other revelations come courtesy of Yelp’s new WordMap, a data visualization feature showing the frequency with which specific words appear in reviews throughout a city. Most findings were fairly predictable, such as tourists sticking exclusively to downtown. However, it did contain one sad revelation — Seattle has fewer neighborhoods with “romantic” spots than any other city covered.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!