Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Cathy Bassetti and Judsen Marquardt some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Water Works: Miracle on Vine Street

One downtown neighborhood's push to create an urban watershed has helped reduce the toxic runoff fouling Puget Sound.
Stormwater capture a la Vine Street

Stormwater capture a la Vine Street Photo: Jordan Stead

Editor's Note: This story is the first in a four-part series on urban water use, which appears courtesy of and in partnership with Orion magazine's two-year series, Reimagining Infrastructure.

On a winter’s day in Seattle, a leaden monotony hangs over the Central Business District, dispiriting to this part of downtown. Contrary to reputation, the urban pallor is not born of rain, which falls almost imperceptibly from silvery clouds that match the nearby waters of Puget Sound. Rather, the gloom rises from the cement hardscape. The busy streets are paved dark gray, the wide sidewalks beside them light gray. The skyscrapers rise in shades of gray. The hulking freeways, ramps, and overpasses: gray. The monorail track and its elephantine pillars: gray.

Trudge the sidewalks northwest to Seattle’s Belltown neighborhood, hang a left on Vine Street toward the sound, and a ten-foot-tall, bright blue rain tank pops from the dullness, tipped whimsically toward a red brick office building. Atop the tank, green pipes in the shape of fingers and a thumb reach out, the stretched index finger connected to a downspout from the rooftop.

Rainwater flows from roof to finger to palm to thumb, from which it pours to a series of descending basins built between the sidewalk and the street. They, in turn, cascade to landscaped wedges growing thick with woodland plants. For two blocks, as Vine slopes toward the sound, water trickles down a runnel and through street-side planters, shining stones and stepped terraces, enlivening the roadway with greenery, public sculpture, and the sounds of falling water.

The project, called Growing Vine Street, began as a small, grassroots effort among residents and property owners to turn their stretch of a former industrial neighborhood into an urban watershed. Twenty years later, it is a big part of the answer to the largest single source of pollution fouling Puget Sound and most of the major bays and freshwater ecosystems of the United States — stormwater.

The gray shellac of a city repels more than the imagination. When rain flows along streets, parking lots, and rooftops rather than percolating into the ground, it soaks up toxic metals, oil and grease, pesticides and herbicides, feces, and every other scourge that can make its way to a gutter. This runoff impairs virtually every urban creek, stream, and river in Washington. It makes Pacific killer whales some of the most PCB-contaminated mammals on the planet. It’s driving two species of salmon extinct, and kills a high percentage of healthy coho within hours of swimming into Seattle’s creeks, before they’ve had a chance to spawn.

Returning some of nature’s hydrology to the cityscape can make an enormous difference — or could — as more individuals, businesses, and neighborhoods remake their bit of the terra firma. Washington State University scientists have found that streets with rain gardens clean up 90 percent or more of the pollutants flowing through on their way to the sound. Green roofs reduce runoff between 50 and 85 percent and can drop a building’s energy costs by nearly a third. Cisterns like the one on Vine Street solve two problems, reducing runo= and capturing water for outdoor irrigation which in summer can account for half a city’s freshwater demand.

In the parlance of water professionals, projects like Growing Vine Street are known as “green infrastructure.” But the term does not do justice to the larger water revolution it represents. Across the nation, antiquated infrastructure like Seattle’s, swelling populations, and weather extremes are stressing our triplicate freshwater, stormwater, and wastewater systems like never before. Industry groups such as the American Society of Civil Engineers, American Water Works Association, National Association of Water Companies, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce repeat the mantra that the nation’s water systems are some of the oldest, most overused, and most seriously failing of all America’s infrastructure — worse off than the nation’s bridges. The EPA estimates that repairing, replacing, and upgrading these aging water systems will cost between $300 billion and $1 trillion over the next two decades.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Jul 15, 3:21 p.m. Inappropriate

It's great to see examples of neighborhoods coming together to improve their communities while keeping polluted runoff out of Puget Sound! There are many other examples from our region -- we've become real leaders in the use of green infrastructure. Thanks for the story!

Posted Wed, Jul 17, 3:13 p.m. Inappropriate

Thirty years ago, it was considered acceptable to advocate for protecting the "ecology", and the fact that "ecology" is technically the STUDY of living environments was not pressed in recognition of its colloquial usefulness. We soon assumed the speaker did not mean to protect ecological study. Are we now to start misusing "hydrology" in the same way?

As a nicely written editorial this piece makes good reading. For anyone close to public infrastructure, it is but a bubble on the surface of the vast and astounding complexities of drinking water, sewerage, and storm water, all three of which fundamentally defy being lumped in with the other two.

Reimagining basic infrastructure does not belong in the province of
environmentalist late-comers, it is the very real aspiration and inspiration of anyone trying to actually provide services at an affordable cost.

Slidezone

Posted Sun, Jul 21, 10:16 a.m. Inappropriate

Please, please, use writers and headline writers that demonstrate that they know what they're talking about; that is, exhibit even a basic understanding of the subject they're writing about. One does not "create a watershed." One may improve the hydrological or ecological functioning of a watershed or its pollutant removal capacity. But you don't "create" a watershed unless you are physically changing the topography of the land..

---------------
wa·ter·shed
/ˈwôtərˌSHed/
Noun
An area or ridge of land that separates waters flowing to different rivers, basins, or seas.
An area or region drained by a river, river system, or other body of water.
Synonyms
divide - water parting
---------------
http://water.epa.gov/type/watersheds/whatis.cfm

What is a Watershed?
A watershed is the area of land where all of the water that is under it or drains off of it goes into the same place. John Wesley Powell, scientist geographer, put it best when he said that a watershed is:

"that area of land, a bounded hydrologic system, within which all living things are inextricably linked by their common water course and where, as humans settled, simple logic demanded that they become part of a community."
Watersheds come in all shapes and sizes. They cross county, state, and national boundaries. In the continental US, there are 2,110 watersheds; including Hawaii Alaska, and Puerto Rico, there are 2,267 watersheds.

Steve E.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »