Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Robert Gogerty and Sharon Kleinknecht some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Is Francis for real?

The new Catholic pope is refreshing - and popular. But can he convert those fans to followers?
Can Pope Francis turn fans into followers?

Can Pope Francis turn fans into followers? Wikimedia Commons

The newest blog at the on-line site for the National Catholic Reporter is “The Francis Chronicles." Followers can sign up for “email alerts” so they can keep up with the very latest on the new Pope.

That “The Francis Chronicles” (complete with instant alerts) even exists says a lot. One, this Pope is interesting. Two, his every remark has not been scrutinized and edited by a small army of Vatican insiders. Three, he might — its seems — say almost anything, at anytime, to anybody.

For his most recent interview, he called La Repubblica founder (and atheist) Eugenio Scalfari directly to set up an appointment. “Why so surprised?” said to the pope to Scalfari, after being patched through by a shaky secretary at the newspaper. “You wrote me a letter asking to meet me in person. I had the same wish, so I’m calling to fix an appointment. Let me look at my diary: I can’t do Wednesday, nor Monday; would Tuesday suit you?” 

Is “who am I to judge?” Francis for real? Not only has he famously refused to judge and condemn people who are homosexual, he has said he thinks the church has been “obsessed” (and not in a good way) with abortion, birth control and gays. Most recently he called attempts to convert people to Christianity “solemn nonsense.”

What effect will such a Pope have on the Catholic Church? Christianity? The World?

And here’s the question I’m really curious about: How did this surprising, refreshing man get to be Pope at all?

When I asked a colleague, a well-informed seminary professor and former Catholic, whether the Church knew what it was getting into when it elected Francis, she answered, “There are so few centrists and progressives in the ranks of the cardinals, it’s hard for me to believe any of them anticipated or wanted what they’re actually getting." The cardinals, she continued, "wanted a clean-up, and then a return to business more or less as usual in terms of the substance of things. Let him rearrange the furniture and get rid of the worst stuff, and then we can get on with it.”

The cardinals can't really be blamed for their misjudgment. Jorge Mario Bergoglio had a reputation as someone who ran a good diocese in Argentina, was clear-thinking and could give a good speech, but little in his track record suggested that he would become a Pope who now so regularly goes off-script. As the National Catholic Reporter journalist John Allen Jr. points out, “During his entire 15 years as archbishop of Buenos Aires, Bergoglio gave a grand total of five interviews. In the seven months he’s been Pope, he’s already done three and they’ve been humdingers.”

Allen argues that, in important respects, Pope Francis is a different man than the one his colleagues knew. So, what happened? What changed? Allen points to a “mystical experience” Bergoglio had as he weighed the possibility of becoming Pope, an experience that Francis spoke of in his most recent interview in La Repubblica.

“My head was completely empty and I was seized by great anxiety,” said Francis of this experience. “To make it go away and relax I closed my eyes and made every thought disappear, even the thought of refusing to accept the position, as the liturgical procedure allows. I closed my eyes and I no longer had any anxiety or emotion.” 

In a different conversation, with a cardinal, Francis referenced this same mystical experience. “When I was elected, a great sense of inner peace and freedom came over me," he explained. "And it’s never left me.”

Hard-headed journalists and skeptics, both secular and religious, will be reluctant to credit an explanation that relies on “mystical experience.” And yet people who have known Francis for a long time, including his family, say he’s not the same guy. Something did happen, and it has helped Francis approach his new calling with remarkable freedom.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Oct 8, 1:35 p.m. Inappropriate

I'm happy to admit that for once I agree with Tony Robinson. Almost. Instead of thinking of the College of Cardinals as naive or cynical, think of them as desperate. If they didn't get somebody like this after the Ratzinger disaster, their ratings would go down even more rapidly. Do we need the church or the Pope? Nope.

gabowker

Posted Wed, Oct 9, 10:07 p.m. Inappropriate

I think the answer is "yes," Pope Francis will turn fans into followers -- "if." He has a ton of charisma, the young people love him, and the press loves him, too. The "if" is about whether or not he's able to create genuine cultural change. So far he's leading by example, toppling sacred cows, and making wise strategic choices that say perhaps, yes, he can just do it. Let's imagine that his mystical experience is legit (I'm willing to) and what we get is a genuine movement of the Spirit that will bring new life to beautiful, crazy-quilt Latin church.

The question of "how he got elected" is an interesting one. I think people tend to underestimate the deep frustration and distrust in which the cardinals hold the Curia. They see corruption and ineptitude. Their choice of this pope was an effort to put aside the theological rigor and administrative blindness of the previous pope and instead install a pastor/leader with skills at articulating and living faith in a changing environment. They got that in spades. The result is a rare glimmer of hope for one of the world's largest and most rigid institutions. I wish this pope long life and good health. He has a lot of work to do. I'm unabashedly an admirer of what he's done so far.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »