Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Donald Kane and William Daniell some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    Green Spokane? Inslee receives support on climate

    Most speakers at an Eastern Washington hearing favored stronger action to deal with greenhouse gases.
    Gov. Jay Inslee

    Gov. Jay Inslee Governor's Office

    The red part of Washington was actually quite green Wednesday.

    Sixty-three of 85 people testifying before Gov. Jay Inslee's climate change panel supported the state taking some action to fight global warming's effect on Washington. Twelve opposed such action. The rest could not be neatly pigeonholed. About 225 people attended the public hearing in Spokane Wednesday evening.

    Inslee and Democrats on the panel are much more eager to take strong action on global warming than the panel's Republican legislators. The public support in the heart of Republican territory will certainly be welcome for Inslee, although it's hard to know if it will produce momentum for strong recommendations from the panel when it wraps up its work shortly. 

    "We want you to know, Governor, that we've got your back," said Todd Eklof of Spokane.

    "We're actually changing the temperature and acidity of the oceans. ... That harms the state's economy. How do we justify that?" said Ed Reynolds of Spokane.

    Rene Holliday of the Spokane area retorted: "We need to address the fact that global warming doesn't exist." About 25 people applauded her.

    "Let's not pretend that problems with carbon dioxide emissions don't exist," countered Carol Bryan of the Spokane area.

    Others worried about climate change-oriented rules sending Washington jobs elsewhere. "Find out the costs of the policies you are considering. Then come back and ask the public for input," said Michael Cathcart of the Spokane Homebuilders Association. 

    In 2008, Washington's Legislature set a goal of reducing the state's greenhouse emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, with further trimming of emissions to 25 percent below Washington's 1990 level by 2035 and to 50 percent below by 2050. So far, nothing has happened. If no new remedial measures are tackled and the state' population growth continues, state discharges will blast away all the goals for reductions set five years ago. Early this year, Inslee successfully lobbied the Legislature to set up a task force to map out how those goals can be reached. The task force is supposed to have recommendations for the state Legislature by Dec. 31.

    The task force — composed of Inslee; Sen. Doug Ericksen, R-Ferndale; Sen. Annette Cleveland, D-Vancouver and filling in for Sen. Kevin Ranker, D-Orcas Island; Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy; and Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, D-Burien — is holding two hearings about the public's ideas on dealing with climate change before coming up with a draft report on Dec. 6. Wednesday's Spokane forum was the first hearing. The second is scheduled for 6 p.m. next Wednesday at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center on 2211 Alaskan Way in Seattle.

    While King County is heavily Democratic, northeastern Washington is overwhelmingly Republican with the exception of central Spokane.

    The Spokane hearing's biggest concern was coal-bearing trains potentially using a pair of Washington ports to export coal to China, something that has encountered significant opposition around the state over greenhouse gas emissions and other issues. Twenty-one speakers opposed that plan, while one supported it.

    Beyond coal, support and opposition to various potential new policies were fragmented.

    Of the 13 possible new policies that could be used in Washington to combat carbon dioxide emissions, three have the biggest potential significant reductions — cap-and-trade, a carbon tax and low-carbon fuel standards.

    The most potent proposed policy would be to install a cap-and-trade program in which Washington would have an overall annual limit to its carbon dioxide emissions. Limits would be set for specific geographic areas. Firms would obtain rights for specific amounts of emissions in those areas. And the companies would be able to swap, buy and sell their rights to each other. Inslee likes this approach because the market would be the prime mover in combating increased carbon dioxide emissions. 

    A carbon tax is simply a levy on a firm's carbon dioxide emissions, and it is supposed to inspire a business to decrease its emissions. Since transportation emissions account for 44 percent of Washington's carbon dioxide output, requiring lower carbon levels in fuel mixes would help. The other 10 potential measures address public transit, wind power, ocean power, other clean energy sources, landfill methane capture, plus technical tweaks in fuels and vehicles.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Fri, Oct 18, 8:38 a.m. Inappropriate

    You mention the "troubled history of the Energy Northwest reactor." What is that history?

    The cleanup and other issues commonly mentioned are not associated with energy production but plutonium creation associated with creating nuclear weapons. Those are completely different and Energy Northwest has nothing to do with that. Different organizations. Different processes. Different goals.

    Too often those on the left claim climate change is the most important issue of our time...unless we have to do something I oppose.

    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »