Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Gail Chiarello and Katie Hong some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    The cost of Seattle police reform

    $5.4 million already spent, a $12 million tech upgrade on the horizon, and no word on when the reform - or the spending - might end.
    Headed in the right direction.

    Headed in the right direction. smohundro/Flickr

    Reforming the Seattle Police Department is getting pricey.

    The city has already spent at least $5.4 million on reform-related expenses and Merrick Bobb, the monitor overseeing the federally mandated process, is recommending technology upgrades that could cost the city almost $12 million.

    The police department has already shelled out about $4 million on budget items tied to reforms, including new staff, overtime and training, according to the City Budget Office and Bobb's team has billed Seattle $860,663 for a 13-month period that ended in November 2013. The highest monthly invoice the team has submitted so far was for last October: $99,255. And the city dropped another $473,268 on the community police commission working with the monitor on reform.

    Meanwhile, in a report issued last December, the monitoring team recommended that Seattle purchase a custom-designed system to store, manage and analyze police department data. The projected pricetag: about $11.87 million. The beefed-up technology, known as a "business intelligence system," would likely cost an additional $904,880 a year to maintain, according to the report. All the numbers in the report are estimates and developing the system would require more analysis.

    The 2014 city budget shows $3 million in a reserve fund for police department "business intelligence and overtime." The money is included in “Finance General,” a section of the budget where the city can set aside general fund dollars. The budget says: “The City will hold the funding in Finance General until it determines final costs of the new system.”

    Guiding the reform process is a settlement agreement, which was forged between Seattle and the federal government in 2012 after a 2011 Department of Justice investigation found patterns of excessive force violations within the city's police department.

    Bruce Harrell, who heads the City Council’s Public Safety, Civil Rights and Technology Committee, Tim Burgess, who chairs the Budget Committee and Mayor Ed Murray's office did not respond to requests for comments about the city’s police reform expenditures. The monitoring team would not comment on the business intelligence system, or on whether the upgrades would definitely be required in order for the city to meet the terms of the settlement agreement.

    The business intelligence system, said the team's report, would allow the department to better track officer activities and performance. It would specifically gather information related to use-of-force, administrative investigations, complaints, car crashes, pursuits and lawsuits.

    The report says that the department’s current data management regime relies too heavily on paper documents, and contains unreliable and out-of-date information scattered across multiple, uncoordinated computer systems. The department currently spends about $15.8 million each year on information technology, including desktop computers, radio networks, software and staff. By tracking departmental data more closely, police supervisors would presumably be able to intervene early if an officer is having performance problems.

    "The Monitor has identified a number of deficiencies with the Seattle Police Department’s (SPD) current business processes and systems that may hinder compliance with the Settlement Agreement," the report says.

    The settlement agreement does say that the department should have an “early intervention system,” that can be used to “assist officers in avoiding potentially troubling behavior,” and that the department should also be able to “collect, maintain and retrieve information” about use of force, administrative complaints and officer reviews.

    A July 2013 report issued by the Police Executive Forum, a nonprofit professional organization for law enforcement chief executives, suggests that strong early intervention systems, can improve departments. New Jersey's former Attorney General said in the report that during an effort to reform the state's police the early intervention system "was very expensive and difficult to develop, but it was the critical component."

    The City Budget Office began tracking reform costs in October 2012, the same month that a federal judge approved Bobb as Seattle’s monitor. The budget office reports the costs to the City Council each month. The latest report was filed on Dec. 20 and showed expenses through November 2013.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Fri, Jan 10, 8:34 a.m. Inappropriate

    Wouldn't it be more cost effective to give police personnel a raise for good behavior rather than trying to control bad behavior? "Jus say'n"...


    Posted Fri, Jan 10, 8:58 a.m. Inappropriate

    Model the cost savings of reduced payouts in legal fees and lawsuits as a result of a non reformed police department, and I bet the costs will begin to pay for themselves in the next few years. Not to mention, that it is probably the right thing to do, and sometimes the moral thing is not necessarily cost efficient. In either case, we are all better off.

    Posted Sat, Jan 11, 12:44 a.m. Inappropriate

    I am always absolutely floored by the amount of money spent by cities on software or computing systems. When I worked at a local biotech here, we had 50k of linux boxes strung together running massive amounts of data across forward and inverse matrices from multiple online databases.

    How on Earth does it cost 12 million to purchase a system to monitor the records of roughly 2000 employees? The $700 air force toilet seat comes to mind.


    Posted Sat, Jan 11, 7:05 a.m. Inappropriate

    make them a proposal :)


    Posted Mon, Jan 13, 7:37 a.m. Inappropriate

    How could it cost so much? Because the corrupt clowns who run city government had to search far and wide for some incompetent insiders to submit inflated bids.


    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »