Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Suzanne Hanson and George Heidorn some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

What? No public comment? Dems call Senate GOP bluff

More squabbling in the Senate: The Dem from Maury Island levels an allegation of unfairness at the Senate's Coalition Caucus.
Sen. Sharon Nelson

Sen. Sharon Nelson John Stang

A tiff has begun in Olympia over how some Washington Senate Republican bills are routed to committee.

On Monday, Senate Minority Leader Sharon Nelson, D-Maury Island, said the 24-Republican-two-Democrat Majority Coalition Caucus has sent some bills directly to the Senate Ways & Means Committee — which handles budget matters — instead of first to policy-oriented committees.

Democrats contend public feedback is being shortchanged by this process, while Republicans counter that it's a longstanding practice by whichever party is in power.

"There is an end run around the policy committees. You can't hear from citizens about policy matters," Nelson said. 

"We're going to continue to object [about this practice]."

Nelson cited four bills as examples. One, a bill by Sen. Andy Hill, R-Redmond, would require a legislative hearing on any state legal settlements of $1 million or more. It was introduced Monday and referred directly to the Ways and Means Committee, which he chairs.

Hill also introduced another bill Monday that would allow county governments to create "cultural access authorities" — bodies designed to supervise science and art institutions such as museums and zoos, but with the authority to levy sales and property taxes if approved by voters. A bill that would forbid campaign fundraising by state legislators in budget years until they have successfully passed a budget was introduced by Sen. Joe Fain, R-Auburn, on January 7.

Both bills went directly to the Ways & Means Committee. Fain's bill was passed through the committee and now faces a full Senate vote. 

A fourth example raised by Nelson, a bill from Sen. Mike Padden, R-Spokane Valley, that addresses landlord-tenant matters, was actually referred to the Senate's Law & Justice Committee.

Senate Republican Caucus Leader Mark Schoesler, R-Ritzville, seemed unconcerned about the conflict. "I've been here for 21 years," he said, "and there's always been complaints in both bodies by both sides about referrals [of bills to committees]."

John Stang covers state government for Crosscut. He can be reached by writing editor@crosscut.com.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Jan 21, 9:29 a.m. Inappropriate

It's not hard to see the Republican logic at work here: deny a public hearing in a policy committee by referring legislation straight to Ways & Means, a fiscal committee; when the public shows up to complain about why the legislation is bad public policy, they're gaveled down and told "this is a fiscal committee, we only address the budgetary impact of legislation."

Posted Tue, Jan 21, 9:34 a.m. Inappropriate

It's telling that the Republicans "counter that it's a longstanding practice by whichever party is in power" without providing a few examples of similarly egregious abuses from when the Democrats controlled the Senate.

Posted Wed, Jan 22, 12:30 p.m. Inappropriate

Your link to the bill to open a new property tax avenue lists both Nelson and Kohl-Welles as sponsors. Not too surprising, except for its inclusion in the complaint.

afreeman

Posted Thu, Jan 23, 5:33 a.m. Inappropriate

Meanwhile, Republican-sponsored bills that actually have the word "tax" in the title - like SB 6182 (Establishing a tax credit for employers participating in the apprenticeship program) - get a hearing in the appropriate policy committee so their business-boosters can endlessly gush about how wonderful they are (and provide quotes for Republicans to use in their fundraising appeals).

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »