Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Sheila Smith and Dennis Forsyth some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Written in saltwater: It's time to stand up for Washington's maritime history

Guest Opinion: A new set of bills before the Legislature would create a special designation for historical shoreline and maritime sites across the state. What are we waiting for?
The Lady Washington, a replica of an historic ship, is Washington state's official ship.

The Lady Washington, a replica of an historic ship, is Washington state's official ship. Courtesy of Grays Harbor Historical Seaport Authority.

Washington state's history is written on saltwater. For thousands of years, native peoples traded and traveled on Puget Sound and coastal waterways in sea-going canoes. In 1774, Spanish explorer Juan Perez was the first European to sight the coast of present-day Washington in his frigate Santiago. In 1792, Captain George Vancouver explored and mapped Puget Sound from his ship Discovery. Within a century, the human geography of the state we know today west of the Cascade Mountains took shape.

Professional and amateur historians, historical societies and small museums have spent decades telling the stories of the ships, lighthouses, waterfronts and shorelines of Washington and now they want to take another step toward educating local communities, the state's 6.9 million residents, and tens of thousands of visitors about Washington's maritime past. They have asked the Legislature to enact a law designating the state's saltwater shoreline a “Washington State Maritime Heritage Area.”

Without adding any new regulations affecting property owners, a Washington State Maritime Heritage Area enables non-profit organizations such as the Northwest Maritime Center in Port Townsend, the Center for Wooden Boats in Seattle, and the Grays Harbor Historical Seaport Authority in Aberdeen to improve coordination and marketing of the state's maritime heritage resources to neighboring states, the country as a whole, and nearby Canadian provinces.

Two bills, HB 2386 and its companion SB 6246, would create the heritage area. The bills are now under consideration at the state capitol. Neither proposal affects the state budget.

If enacted, the bills benefit the state in several ways. The heritage area promotes tourism by acknowledging the significance of maritime heritage attractions and resources. It increases public awareness of Puget Sound, the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Washington's Pacific Coast. And it fosters an appreciation of the maritime trades and the need for new workers in an industry vital to maintaining a diverse and strong state economy in the 21st century.

Maritime museums, chambers of commerce, and visitors bureaus would use the Washington Maritime Heritage Area designation on brochures and websites to entice people to waterfront attractions, including small businesses that serve locals and visitors. The heritage area also offers a visual opportunity to link maritime heritage attractions together, helping residents and visitors find their way to attractions, similar to the state's Scenic Byways program.

A state maritime heritage area may also get the attention of Congress. In 2010, the state Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation submitted a feasibility study to the National Park Service advocating for the creation of a national maritime heritage area on Washington's saltwater shores.

To date, Congress has designated 49 national heritage areas, but none are in Washington state. According to a recent report using NPS data, these areas contribute $12.9 billion annually to the U.S. economy. By creating a Washington State Maritime Heritage Area, the Legislature shows Congress that Washington's saltwater coast deserves similar recognition and a chance for similar benefits.

HB 2386 and SB 6246 enjoy wide public support. The Pacific Northwest Maritime Heritage Council, a coalition of 113 maritime heritage groups, museums, and historians, is lobbying lawmakers for passage of the bills. (Disclosure: I'm communications director for the Grays Harbor Historical Seaport Authority, a supporter of the bill.) All members of the King County Council signed a letter endorsing the heritage area.

As the author of two national maritime heritage guides and a history of the lumber schooner Wawona, I know that Washington State's maritime heritage is equal in significance to better-known stories from our east coast relations. Lawmakers in Olympia should pass a bill now to create a state maritime heritage area and send it to Gov. Jay Inslee's desk for signature.

For exclusive coverage of the state government, check out Crosscut's Under the Dome page.

Joe Follansbee is a Seattle writer who has independently published "Shipbuilders, Sea Captains and Fisherman: The Story of the Schooner Wawona," and a historical novel for young adults. He's currently working on two science fiction novels. He blogs at joefollansbee.com.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Feb 14, 3:27 p.m. Inappropriate

Great, as far as it goes. Unfortunately and inexplicably, the Maritime Heritage Area stops at the water's edge, and does nothing concrete to protect historic or archaeological sites. Because the MHA focuses on upland built environment, it excludes nearly all Native American sites (and in fact celebrates many historic places whose construction obscured or destroyed such sites). Because the bills focus on boosting tourism and go to great pains to avoid controversial regulation or the cost of preserving this maritime heritage, they have very limited value in terms of actual protection and stabilization of maritime heritage.
Meanwhile, our historic preservation laws in Washington encourage treatment of submerged historic resources as souvenirs to be hauled up by recreational looters or treasure to be taken by salvagers.
I support establishing a Maritime Heritage Area, but wish it went beyond the high water mark and that it did something concrete to protect our maritime heritage.

Mojourner

Posted Sat, Feb 15, 5:35 p.m. Inappropriate

So all that this proposal does is create some kind of logo that waterfront historical attractions can put in their brochures? Sounds innocent enough, but decades of experience lead me to believe that somehow, property owners are going to get the shaft, especially if the federal government gets involved. Maybe not immediately, but eventually. If all of Washington's saltwater shoreline becomes "special" it can't help but mean trouble. That little Lost in Space Robot in the back of my mind is flailing its arms and yelling "Danger! Danger!"

dbreneman

Posted Mon, Feb 17, 4:20 p.m. Inappropriate

Joe, you have got to find a more contemporary photo ;))

tom_hyde

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »