Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Terris Draheim and JoElla Weybright some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    The death penalty: Arbitrary and deeply flawed

    Guest Opinion: With Gov. Jay Inslee’s recent decision to halt executions, an issue that has gripped public defenders for decades is finally getting the public attention it deserves.
    David Chapman, King County's interim public defender, speaks out against the death penalty.

    David Chapman, King County's interim public defender, speaks out against the death penalty. Credit: Leslie Brown

    Public defenders in King County have long voiced concern over the state’s use of the death penalty, contending that it’s a deeply flawed and arbitrary form of punishment. Now, thanks to Gov. Jay Inslee’s decision last month to place a moratorium on executions, an issue that has gripped the public defense community for decades is getting the kind of public attention it deserves.

    Why do I and my colleagues consider the death penalty system broken beyond repair?

    First, racial disparity permeates the use of capital punishment, both in Washington and across the country. Since 1976, 20 white defendants have been executed for the murder of a black person in the United States, while 269 black people have been executed for the murder of a white person. In Washington, nine people are currently on death row, four of whom are African-American. That’s nearly 50 percent, in a state where African-Americans comprise 4 percent of the population.

    Second, no system of justice is flawless, but the price of a mistake when it comes to capital punishment is greater than we, as a civilized and democratic society, should bear. Since 1973, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, more than 140 men on death row have been exonerated, one of them from Washington state. At least 10 people, according to the organization, have been executed despite compelling evidence of innocence.

    Finally, countless studies have shown that capital punishment is increasingly an arbitrary sanction — a punishment based not on some objective measure of the alleged crime but on geography, the beliefs of individual prosecutors and budgetary concerns. Currently, for instance, three death penalty cases are under way in King County, but Yakima County hasn’t prosecuted one since 1989 — and not for a lack of opportunity. (A family of three was bludgeoned to death in Yakima in 2011.) What’s more, several of the state’s most notorious killers have been sentenced to life in prison without parole (Gary Ridgeway, for instance, who was convicted of murdering 49 women), while others who committed crimes not nearly as heinous have been executed.

    Just how arbitrary is capital punishment in Washington state? Consider the words of State Supreme Court Justice Mary Fairhurst from a 2012 opinion: “One could better predict whether the death penalty will be imposed on Washington’s most brutal murderers by flipping a coin than by evaluating the crime and the defendant.”

    As Gov. Inslee noted when he announced his moratorium on executions, the paramount duty of the state is ensuring equal justice under the law. When the death penalty is applied arbitrarily, when geography and budgets — not the brutality of the crime — dictate its use, “equal justice” becomes, at best, a hollow and meaningless phrase.

    This debate is hardly academic for us in public defense. King County’s Department of Public Defense currently has eight attorneys assigned to three aggravated murder cases where the prosecutor is seeking the death penalty instead of life in prison without parole. These are the most serious and complex cases a public defender can take on — and ones with the most significant ramifications and the highest public costs. Every motion, every legal maneuver, gets scrutinized at the appellate level, meaning the attorney has to get it right the first time — or face a potential reversal, a much costlier proposition.

    I welcome a discussion about our current criminal statutes. And I applaud the governor for giving us the time out we need to take a closer look at how the death penalty, the ultimate criminal sanction, plays out in Washington state. According to state statute, the presumed sentence for aggravated murder is life in prison without the possibility of release. My hope is that a thoughtful conversation will lead many to realize that life imprisonment provides both justice and protection and that capital punishment is no longer a humane or effective response to violence in our community.

    David Chapman is the interim public defender for King County. He heads the county’s Department of Public Defense, a new department in King County that employs more than 200 public defenders.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Tue, Mar 11, 5:38 p.m. Inappropriate

    This op-ed, taking an opposing view by 8th District Rep. Dave Reichert, was published in the Seattle Times on March 10, 2014:


    Reichert's views are in sharp contrast with the piece above and the overwhelming majority of the comments following the Reichert piece.

    Posted Tue, Mar 11, 5:43 p.m. Inappropriate

    Another example that you buy justice in America today. Can you get away with murder? Sure, just ask OJ. If you are poor don't expect any justice.


    Posted Tue, Mar 11, 10:18 p.m. Inappropriate

    I've turned around on the DP over the years; used to be a real law-and-order-hang-em-high kind of person.
    My conversion is reinforced each time I read of a lab tech mishandling evidence, a judge falling asleep, a prosecutor withholding evidence ("it wouldn't help the defense, anyway"), the young public defender appointed to represent a defendant in a capital crime, the cop lying in his reports and/or testimony.
    Let's not forget the condemned who are released because of some error(s) that threatened to take his life wrongfully.
    Finally, I'm not comfortable with the State killing someone in my name when that 'someone' is in no position to harm anyone. How is that different from murder?


    Posted Wed, Mar 12, 7:34 a.m. Inappropriate

    Interesting how murderers are being allowed to live but it's still open season on unborn babies who've only committed the crime of inconvenience. Kind of says it all.

    Posted Wed, Mar 12, 11:40 a.m. Inappropriate


    You're in error on every point.


    "There is no race of the offender / victim effect at either the decision to advance a case to penalty hearing or the decision to sentence a defendant to death given a penalty hearing."

    "As blacks represent 47% of murderers and whites 37%, we see that whites are twice as likely to be executed for committing murder as are their black counterparts."

    Posted Wed, Mar 12, 11:44 a.m. Inappropriate

    The Death Penalty: Do Innocents Matter? - updated 2/15/2014
    A Review of All Innocence Issues

    The Death Penalty: Fair & Just

    Saving Costs with The Death Penalty

    Posted Wed, Mar 12, 11:45 a.m. Inappropriate

    Both the guilty & the innocent have the greatest of protections

    The facts tell us that the death penalty is the least arbitrary and capricious sanction in the US.

    Protections for the guilty murderer and the actual innocent accused are unmatched by any other sanction protocol.

    Nothing else comes close.

    Posted Mon, Mar 17, 3:46 p.m. Inappropriate

    Why does no one mention the obvious here -- ALL of the defendants, and ALL of those executed in this state, and nearly all nationally, are men?

    Don't say that most of the violent felons are men. That would be sexist.


    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »