Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Lisa Cicconi and Richard Wilhelm some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

How annoying: The risky business of being a pest

Towns across the country try to ban “annoyance,” but NPR raises it to an art form.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported on the thorny legal issues attending on the outwardly simple word “annoy.” It seems the word in one form or another appears in more than 5,000 state and municipal ordinances across the country.

A 2012 Indiana law makes a criminal of anyone who “harasses, annoys, or alarms another person” while drunk in a public place. The Town of Liberty, New York, deems it aggravated harassment to use phone or pen in a way “likely to cause annoyance or alarm.” It prosecuted a visitor who annoyed town officials by replacing “Liberty” with “TYRANNY” on the payment form for a speeding ticket.

Lawrence, Massachusetts, forbids annoying others in city parks. Winthrop, Massachusetts, bans it on town beaches. Cumberland, Maryland, protects city employees rather than the general citizenry from “annoyance.” Syracuse, New York, forbids gathering on street or sidewalk for “any purpose to the annoyance or disturbance of citizens.” Traffic congestion is deeply annoying to many of us. Does that make drivers criminals?

That’s the rub with such ordinances generally: Annoyance is in the mind (and eyes, ears and nose) of the annoyed. Scrupulous enforcement would mean banning music, since everything from Bach to Beyoncé annoys someone. Syracuse stopped enforcing its public annoyance law in 2012, after a federal judge declared it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court struck down a similar Cincinnati ordinance 43 years ago, noting that “conduct that annoys some people does not annoy others.”

Washington law may avoid that trap by looking to the intent rather than the result, in defining “malice”: "’Malice’ and ‘maliciously’ shall import an evil intent, wish, or design to vex, annoy, or injure another person.” But what do they mean by 'evil'?

Though the objects of annoyance vary, the emotion itself is visceral and universal. And, at the same time, shameful. We feel ashamed at getting worked up over something as trivial as finger tapping, the “Winchester Cathedral” song. There are copy editors for whom inserting an adverb between main and helping verbs or ending a sentence with a preposition are things up with which they never will put. You loathe the annoyance and loathe yourself for being annoyed. And that just gets you more worked up.

I confess that I think about this — that is, I get annoyed — often of late when I listen to public radio. And not just when it goes into pledge overdrive, as the local NPR stations did earlier this month.

Public radio is the medium we love to hate (as opposed to much more obnoxious and brain-deadening commercial formats, which we just ignore). We all have our pet peeves about NPR and its local outlets: They’re too leftwing, too rightwing, too timid, too grandiose, too fluffy, too staid and serious, too puerile and pop culture-oriented. And we each have our special list of insufferable hosts and shows.

If I were sent up for enhanced interrogation, a few hours of Car Talk, Sound Opinions, The Splendid Table, The Dinner Party Download or Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me would shake every secret out of me.

Radio’s special power to annoy in part reflects its success, endurance and ubiquity. Familiarity can make a show like A Prairie Home Companion as comfortable as an old shoe, or make us totally sick of it. Or both, in succession and alternation.

The most ubiquitous voice on public radio hasn’t been on air as long as Garrison Keillor, but it’s heard a lot more often. It doesn’t appear on any show; rather, it pipes up before, after and in their middles. It is more than any other the Voice of Public Radio. It cuts in before and after news breaks, sometimes after just a brief musical riff, to list the corporations, foundations and odd casino tribe with an image to repair who’ve brought us this commercial-free radio.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Apr 14, 9:25 a.m. Inappropriate

Having been an announcer at both commercial and non-commercial radio stations, I found this interesting and refreshing.

I wouldn't be too hard on non-commercial stations in general, though. Yes, KPLU or KUOW are bland corporate entities driven by raking in non-profits with announcers better-suited for libraries, but stations like KSER, KBCS and KAOS give listeners true musical diversity (if not diverse political thought) with all-volunteer announcers and very small paid office staffs. In short, what you hear comes from "real" people and not corporation-generated programming from the East Coast. I grew up listening to KRAB and am now a proud member of KAOS.

BTW, there's a terrific list of noncom stations on the Gumbo Pages website, where it says, "The most interesting and creative radio in North America is invariably found over on the left-hand side of the dial, those frequencies between 87 and 92 mHz that in the U.S. are reserved for educational, community and noncommercial use." Generally, I agree. Commercial radio is cookie-cutter fare while non-corporate noncoms can bring you the whole menu.

Posted Mon, Apr 14, 6:22 p.m. Inappropriate

Here in the Northeast, Maine Public Broadcasting does their fundraising in ONE day, in the spring and in the fall. It's tolerable. I can live without listening to NPBN for one day. Why more stations don't try this I don't know. Though they fell a bit short of their goal this past week, they have exceeded it in the past.

Posted Mon, Apr 14, 10:13 p.m. Inappropriate

I always assumed those rote announcements were computer-generated, like the station announcements on Link light rail. They just type in the message, and the computer converts it into the voice of your choice, accent of your choice. Much cheaper than paying someone to read text into a recorder.

Posted Tue, Apr 15, 11:34 a.m. Inappropriate

"...but lately NPR has turned the readings over to a single, very different voice: sharp, insistent, and whinging, at once plaintive and scolding.


If this is the guy I think it is, the one with the thin, reedy voice who pronounces "dot com" as "daht cahm", he's been on NPR for years and, yeah, he is annoying.

dbreneman

Posted Wed, Apr 16, 5:20 p.m. Inappropriate

It's the voices of the NPR staff that I cannot stand. Especially the ones with the monotone drone tone, and the guy with the thin, reedy mosquito voice. Fingernails on chalkboard, and an instant radio station change.

They are all so bad, they must go to the worst voice training method school in the universe.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »