Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Anne Focke and Terri Hiroshima some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Glacial tourism in the age of climate change

A Mossback post card from Alberta's shrinking industry.
Mossback's Knute Berger at the Athabasca glacier in Alberta

Mossback's Knute Berger at the Athabasca glacier in Alberta Credit: Carol Poole

It's not hard to see glaciers from Seattle — just look at Mt. Rainier. But it's another thing to stand on one.

I was recently in Alberta, Canada on a travel writing assignment. Part of my stay was hosted by Travel Alberta, the provincial tourism organization. During the visit, we drove up the Icefields Parkway, a spectacular highway that runs through Banff and Jasper National Parks in the Canadian Rockies. On either side snowcapped peaks loom, including one long string of mountains called the Endless Chain Range. It certainly feels that way.

We were up there to visit the Athabasca Glacier which flows from the great Columbia Icefield. The icefield system, including more than a dozen glaciers, encompasses about 100 square miles of snow and ice. This time of year, the mountains are still snow covered, the high lakes beginning to thaw. The Columbia Icefield's snowmelt makes its way into three oceans: the Pacific, Arctic and Atlantic (via Hudson Bay) from a peak called Snow Dome. The landscape has a mammoth, fantasy-like, Game of Thrones-y feel.

At the Columbia Icefield visitor's center in Jasper National Park, on the border with Banff National Park, you can hike or ride up to the Athabasca Glacier, which oozes down the mountain plateau icefield and ends near the highway. Between the road and the glacier's front edge are moraines and piles of gravel ribboned with streams flowing from the melting ice. It resembles a chaotic quarry, or perhaps a gray Martian surface when that planet still had liquid water. In addition to the Athabasca, other glaciers higher up on either side hang off adjacent slopes.

Standing in this spot, you feel like you're at the center of a traffic circle of converging glaciers. And you can actually walk on one by taking an 80-minute tour on a huge, six-wheeled bus-like conveyance called a Snow Coach. It looks a bit like a hard-top Duck on super-sized, chest-high tires.

These machines which, we're told, cost more than $1 million each, take you from the visitor's center through the moraines and up onto the surface of the glacier itself. From there, tourists can get out and tromp around on the ice. A Canadian flag flies and you feel a bit like you've just reached the North Pole. You get to see and touch the blue ice of the glacier, you can stoop to drink fresh meltwater, pick up crystal clear icicles and take endless selfless against the spectacular mountain backdrop.

It's exhilarating, especially for those of us who are not glacier hoppers like John Muir and the other adventurers for whom bounding over the ice and its crevasses was or is a common experience. But it's a bit ironic too. For one thing, most people get up there by automobile or bus, as the parking lot attests. The company that makes the Snow Coaches (below), our guide/driver tells us, also makes heavy equipment for work in the northern Alberta tar sands. In the era of climate change, is it moral to drive up onto a melting glacier in a gas-guzzling machine?

A couple of days after our visit, the Canadian park service reported the Athabasca glacier was disappearing at an "astonishing" rate. It has been in retreat for a long time, since 1843. Despite heavy annual snowfalls, the glacier has retreated about a mile since the turn of the 19th Century, and it is thinning out too.

Overall, the Athabasca glacier is losing about 15 feet a year. That's not unique to the Athabasca, nor to many of the nearly 8,000 glaciers in British Columbia and Alberta, and most everywhere else.

Many Athabasca tourists know about climate change, but visiting the glacier affords a rare chance to see the phenomenon up close and learn about its impact. Throughout Banff and Jasper parks educational displays explain the water cycle, how glaciers work, the ecosystems of ice and snow. The basic science of it all is there for anyone who chooses to read the panels or listen to the guides.

Global warming, it seems to me, suffers from bad branding. For many people, a warmer Earth sounds more habitable, a good place to get a tan. But the phrase "climate change" is too general, too tepid. There is no sense of consequence.

At the Athabasca, our guide — without editorializing — put what's happening in terms that are strikingly simple. Only two and a half percent of the world's water is fresh water. Of that, 70 percent is stored in glaciers, icecaps and "permanent" snow. If we look at "warming" as a fresh water crisis then climate change takes on greater urgency. Sea level rise we can deal with. But if unabated climate change eliminates key sources of water for drinking, farming, fishing and power generation, now that's a huge problem. The melting of the Athabasca highlights this for us Cascadians because these mountains are the headwaters for the Columbia and Fraser River tributaries and other systems. Our economy is absolutely dependent on Rocky Mountain ice. 

Alberta's economy, unsurprisingly, has some built-in contradictions.The province makes big money both from the glaciers and from oil. It is widely regarded as the Texas of Canada and there is no shortage of SUVs on the road, to say the least. Many of the people we met there were connected in one way or another to the energy industry. No wonder. The scale and impact of the business is mind boggling. In the next 25 years, oil sands revenues are expected to generate $350 billion in royalties for the province and $122 billion in tax revenues. 

At the same time, the Canadian Rockies and their glaciers are critical to a nearly $8 billion annual tourism economy. And the province is investing in it too. The Alberta tourism promotion budget for 2014 is estimated at more than $56 million. In other words, they take tourism very seriously. People come from all over the world to see the Rockies and relish the wilderness, the scenery, the skiing. The questions then: To what degree are their energy and tourism futures at odds? Can the people of Alberta have their glaciers and greenhouse gases too, and if so, for how long?

Strange as it was to rumble onto a glacier in a giant ice terrain vehicle, I would recommend that excursion to everyone who makes it up to Banff or Jasper. You might enjoy it simply because it's exhilarating fun, albeit a bit politically incorrect, as most fun is. But it is also eye-opening in terms of what's at stake. You get a close-up look at a diminishing resource — glaciers are a kind of endangered species central to our entire way of life. You get a glimpse of a comparatively hidden aspect of a key element that makes the region tick. After the glacier excursion, you'll probably come away more committed to — or at least conscious of — trying to sort out our critical climate dilemma. Think of it as a beautiful outing that provides a cold slap in the face about global warming.

Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Grey Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). His newest book is Pugetopolis: A Mossback Takes On Growth Addicts, Weather Wimps, and the Myth of Seattle Nice, published by Sasquatch Books. In 2011, he was named Writer-in-Residence at the Space Needle and is author of Space Needle, The Spirit of Seattle (2012), the official 50th anniversary history of the tower. You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 8:20 a.m. Inappropriate

It's a beautiful and magical place! One that I would like to return to very soon.

In the Seattle area, we were just told we live in a glacial valley, carved by a retreating glacier long-ago. I also like going to Mt. Rainier - especially Box Canyon, where you can stop and look at the power of glaciers leaving the marks of stones and larger boulders on an exposed boulder.

The study of glaciers is a wonderful hobby and we since we all live in an "inter-glacial period" we have the unique ability to see what Earth looked like during the last Ice Age in the Canadian Rockies - yet many of us live in a old glacial valleys! I am always humbled in the fact that Earth has been here a very long time and seen many periods of Ice Ages and hardly no ice at all! (parts of Greenland were actually really green!)

So thank you for a wonderful article about the glorious wonders of Alberta and how the Earth is always changing around us - and if we don't watch out, it will change before our eyes.

HappyGuy

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 8:50 a.m. Inappropriate

In the era of climate change, is it moral to drive up onto a melting glacier in a gas-guzzling machine?

Why wonder at that point, Knute? You've already done your worse with your flight.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/sunday-review/the-biggest-carbon-sin-air-travel.html?_r=0

We have met the enemy and they are hypocrites.

BlueLight

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 9:40 a.m. Inappropriate

Jesus, Mary, and Harry. Is there anyone so pure that they fly this banner of hypocrisy every time an article like this is posted. At the very least you're supporting server farms by typing away, unless you generate your own power by pedaling and prosing at the same time.

We've met the enemy and it is us. Unless you're head is too far into the sand to recognize we all live in glass houses on this issue.

Treker

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 9:26 a.m. Inappropriate

I did fly back, but I took the train up to Banff. Highly recommended!

And yes, hypocrisy is bad; denial even worse.

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 10:13 a.m. Inappropriate

hypocrisy is made of denial

BlueLight

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 12:30 p.m. Inappropriate

"Global warming, it seems to me, suffers from bad branding. For many people, a warmer Earth sounds more habitable, a good place to get a tan. But the phrase "climate change" is too general, too tepid. There is no sense of consequence."

Try armageddon: • a dramatic and catastrophic conflict, typically seen as likely to destroy the world or the human race. Apple Dictionary, Rev. 16:16.

afreeman

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 3:59 p.m. Inappropriate

I think we need a jingle.

Treker

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 9:04 p.m. Inappropriate

One thing that has benefited from climate change/global warming is glacier archeology. Those folks are following the retreating glaciers as fast as their feet will allow, and they are finding a lot of stuff. Obviously we've been this warm before or they wouldn't bother.

Djinn

Posted Tue, Jun 3, 10:33 p.m. Inappropriate

Yes, I learned recently that the Earth has been much warmer in past! Greenland was actually green and they could grow grapes and oranges in England. The ocean was also much higher with water levels higher as well.

What I learned in my Geology class is that the Earth goes through periods of warming and cooling - with the cooling periods being called "Ice Ages". The period we are in now - in long geological terms at least, is called the "inter-glacial period". A time between the last ice age and a warming planet.

What I am most surprised at and like to tell my friends and family is that the Earth (despite what they said and think) has NOT always been like it is today. But because we can see (and I live in one!) old glacial valleys, that glaciers have been advancing and receding many times before. The Earth is always changing! So go and view and enjoy the Earth before it changes yet again!

HappyGuy

Posted Wed, Jun 4, 7:23 a.m. Inappropriate

Yea. Hello - anybody in there? Yea - there have been changes in earth's temperature - but, duh! not caused by the hand of man.. I'm not sure if comments like this are tolls or just showing the state of ignorance of science these days. Either way it's quite a performance. Carry on.

Treker

Posted Thu, Jun 5, 12:57 p.m. Inappropriate

I suggest that you improve your own scientific background.

http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/2014/3/the-nature-of-scientific-proof-in-the-age-of-simulations/1

You can substitute your own preferred field of study, then get back to us when you really understand what the scientific method is, how it's used, and the limitations of scientific simulations using computer models.

Meanwhile University of Washington have published documentation about the success of the Clean Air Act. Find it here http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140411091840.htm

Climate change from the past? Find it here http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130123133612.htm

Djinn

Posted Tue, Jun 10, 11:36 p.m. Inappropriate

I visited the glacier in Juneau Alaska in 2005 and a guy showed me a stick they place at the mouth of the 'ice river' showing how much it recedes every year. It's like 100ft. My reaction was: IT'S ONE HUNDRED FEET. EVERY YEAR. But the guy just shrugged. Everyone just shrugged. The locals in all these places have known about this stuff for decades. I just do not understand why 'reality' gets so little reaction.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »