A workgroup of developers and neighborhood advocates, assembled by Seattle City Councilmember Mike O'Brien, will meet this afternoon to begin discussing how they think micro-housing legislation the council is considering can be improved.
O'Brien chairs the council's planning and land use committee. He decided to convene the group after hearing critical feedback during recent meetings about the newly proposed regulations for the small-sized apartments. Developers say the proposed rules are too restrictive and would quash Seattle's micro-housing market. Neighborhood advocates are concerned about the pace at which the projects are being built, where they are located and the amount of parking.
Also up for debate are Department of Planning and Development guidelines, incorporated into the legislation, for reviewing the design of micro-housing apartment buildings.
Some neighborhood advocates are also skeptical of so-called congregate housing developments, a building classification traditionally reserved for structures like dormitories and retirement homes. They question whether these types of residences should be available for the general public to live in. Regulations for congregate residences are also included in the legislation.
Explaining the creation of the workgroup, O'Brien said, "My hope is that by pulling in some people who are willing to have a conversation, and talk about their concerns, is that we might be able to find some shared values and some common ground." He added: "I have no doubt that there will be policy disagreements at the end of it, but I'm hoping to clarify what those are and frame them up for the council."
A Department of Planning and Development list from the end of February shows 62 micro-housing and congregate residence buildings in various stages of development. The number of rooms in each of them ranges from seven to 230. All together, the planned and completed buildings would add 3,123 rooms to the city's housing market. The list showed that 704 of those units had city certificates allowing for occupants. Square footage for some micro apartments in the projects under development in Seattle would be around 200 square feet including bathroom space — about the same size as four or five pool tables.
The proposed legislation would change the city's land use code, creating a definition for micro-apartments based on room-size and prohibiting buildings containing the small-sized living spaces in areas zoned for single family homes. The regulations also include minimum-size measurements for shared kitchen spaces as well as parking requirements.
Mayor Ed Murray directed the Department of Planning and Development to forward the regulations to the council earlier this year.
Scott E. Shapiro, a member of the workgroup and managing director of Eagle Rock Ventures LLC, a development firm with six micro-housing projects in the works in Ballard and Capitol Hill, said he is optimistic that many of the concerns raised about the proposed regulations can be addressed. But he does not support the legislation as it stands.
"I think it would greatly reduce, if not eliminate micro-housing in the city of Seattle," he said.
For Linda Alexander, who is representing the Eastlake neighborhood on the workgroup, the added strain the buildings could put on street parking is a key issue. "Parking is a big issue for all of the neighborhoods," she said.
Roger Valdez, director of Smart Growth Seattle, a pro-density organization backed by micro-housing developers including Shapiro's firm, said that the parking issue is being overstated. "These people don't have cars," he said. "If the people had cars, they'd go buy a product some place where there's parking."
The proposed regulations would require one parking space for every four sleeping rooms.
While Alexander, who has been a real-estate developer in Seattle for about 30 years, is not opposed to micro-housing, she does not feel the same way about congregate, dormitory-like buildings. She points to a proposed congregate building on Eastlake Avenue East, just north of East Hamlin Street, as a cause for concern. The building is currently moving through the Department of Planning and Development permitting process and, as planned, would include 113 bedrooms and no parking.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!