Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Clarence Cross and Greg Campbell some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

California: Always shining a bit brighter than Seattle

Seattle may feel it's catching up but it's clear the Northwest is still the lesser light culturally and economically.
Sunrise over the Golden Gate Bridge

Sunrise over the Golden Gate Bridge Justin Mier/Flickr

Seattle's ties to California go back to its very beginning and, like it or not, will not go away any time soon.

The major urban centers of the West Coast all sprouted within a decade in the mid-19th century, as Manifest Destiny was in full swing. San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego all began as Mexican settlements, and once the U.S. grabbed California in 1846, enterprising settlers converted them into cities, with the intent of making a killing on land sales. Portland was founded in 1845, as wagons streamed west on the Oregon Trail to the Willamette Valley, and Seattle was founded in 1851 by a handful of Oregon Trail pioneers who decided to turn right at Portland instead of left.

Which of these cities might break out of the pack and become the most prominent center of the West Coast was not preordained. Seattle, with its excellent harbor and strong natural resource base (timber, fish, coal, irrigation water), might have been that leader, were it not for an unforeseen event: the California Gold Rush of 1849. San Francisco's residents were just trying to figure out what it meant to be part of the U.S. instead of Mexico (not all favored the change at the time) when their town suddenly became the center of gold rush commerce.

As it grew rapidly, San Francisco needed more timber than it could find locally, and that is where Seattle came in. The first export of the young city was a load of logs that Arthur Denny sold to the captain of the schooner Leonesa for pilings in San Francisco Bay. After that, a steady stream of logs and lumber headed from Puget Sound to the Golden Gate. San Francisco's famous row houses were built with Northwest timber.

When coal was discovered in the foothills near Seattle, it became another major export to San Francisco, as did fish from Puget Sound and grain from the emerging agricultural areas of Eastern Washington. In return, Seattle residents got manufactured goods that had been imported to San Francisco, first by ship and then by the rails that arrived in Oakland 25 years before they got to Seattle. Recall, in that most authoritative history of Seattle, "Here Come the Brides," the crusty captain Clancy runs his ship between Seattle and San Francisco.

San Francisco was the unquestioned capital of the West Coast in the second half of the 19th century, growing to 300,000 people by 1890, when Seattle and Portland each had just 40,000 residents and Los Angeles had just 50,000. After it got its own railroads and had its own gold rush, Seattle's population swelled, to 250,000 by 1910, and its trade shifted from San Francisco to Alaska and Asia.

The social and cultural contrast that Seattle residents often draw between the Northwest and California goes back to the beginning of their relationship as well. The California gold rush was a rough, mostly male affair, and as the center of that action, San Francisco had a bawdy reputation. The founders of Seattle were well aware of this, and made it a point to grow their city along different lines. Seattle was not to be a louche and dangerous place, but one friendly to the comfortable urban middle class family life that was emerging in late 19th century America. Seattle had more than its share of vice, of course, but those activities were kept well away from the respectable neighborhoods on the hills.

Today, Seattle's relationship to California is built around the flow of people, not products. California is by far the largest source of in-migrants to the Seattle area. In 2013, more than 16,000 Californians traded in their drivers licenses in King, Pierce and Snohomish counties, representing about 20 percent of all transplants tracked by the Department of Licensing. Texas is a distant second, with 5,500 license trade-ins.

California's high migration numbers result, in part, from its size and proximity. But they also reflect a complementarity of industries and the movement of skilled people. Southern California has always been a center of the aerospace industry and technology industry workers will move between the Puget Sound area and Silicon Valley. Both states have large tree fruit and wine industries, port and logistics operations and major military bases.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Jun 20, 3:26 p.m. Inappropriate

Did you just make up the word "complementarity" or was it
such fun to write down and pretend isn't stupid?
You don't need a college education to make words up.

Well told story otherwise and congratulations all around..
I'm just a jerk with a large problem.Bertha.Sea-fence.

Wells

Posted Sun, Jun 22, 9:25 p.m. Inappropriate

Oh, what a steaming crock.
Yes, California is the most populous West Coast state. So, it has sent more "immigrants" to Wyoming, Utah, Idaho and Washington state.
And that proves, what?
San Francisco is a wonderful city. It is not New York -- and cannot measure up in many, many ways.
Los Angeles is an amazing megaopolis. But for every great thing it does, it fails in four or five ways.
So, Seattle can never measure up to California. Because early shipments of logs and fish and oil went south? This is a series of dots that cannot be connected into a rational observation.
This is the sort of faux intellectualism that makes me reluctant to return to this web site/

NealMedia

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »