Is the NW a breeding ground for a new kind of capitalism?
by Kate Harloe
Chris Devore, tech entrepreneur and investor. Credit: Credit: Xconomy.com
First Sea-Tac and now Seattle have instituted $15 minimum wages. Seattle's biggest philanthropic muscle, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was born out of the riches of one of the most competitive companies in tech and, from Starbucks to REI to Costco, our city is peppered with corporations committed to community engagement, worker benefits and member ownership. On the smaller scale, socially conscious companies and start-ups, like code.org, are popping up more and more frequently. Even President Barack Obama centered his last campaign around middle-out economics, an antidote to trickle-down economics that has significant roots in Seattle.
It's no surprise there’s talk of a distinct form of capitalism taking root here in Seattle – Cascadian capitalism, people are calling it.
Its definition is still very much in the making, but one of the most useful definitions floating around comes from Chris DeVore, a Seattle native and founder of venture capital firm Founders’ Co-op, who wrote in a post on his blog in December that “Seattle is emerging as a global leader in fusing the growth-oriented culture of techno-capitalism with a deep and broad commitment to social justice and social mobility.”
A central voice in the conversation, DeVore is the first to admit that his homegrown status might skew his perspective about the city. After years in Silicon Valley, DeVore made a “value decision” to come back to Seattle: “For me, that is the counterpoint that informs all of this.”
“Every day I meet more people in Seattle who add weight to my belief that there is some seriously divergent economic thinking going on up here,” DeVore wrote, “And that we should actually be leaning into it.”
Optimistic, but rational
DeVore is no Pollyanna. The head of one of the Northwest's most successful venture capital outfits, DeVore is skeptical of the idea that private companies should be civic actors.
“Entrepreneurs more generally – they see where the world is going and they want to get there first…" he said. "They’ll work on social justice issues when it aligns with their interests.”
Which is precisely where DeVore and one of Seattle’s most infamous capitalists, Nick Hanauer, would agree. After making a name (and a whole lot of money) for himself as one of Amazon’s first investors, Hanauer went on to become an outspoken advocate of middle-out economics, the idea that prosperity in capitalist economies does not trickle down from the top, but is always built from the middle out
Like DeVore, Hanauer is very much of the “capitalists will be capitalists” school of thought. He is concerned what’s best for business — not fairness. And in his view, an inclusive economy, with a burgeoning middle class, will make for the best businesses, which will give way to the most competitive capitalist economy possible.
The regional success of middle-out economics (think $15 minimum wage) then is interesting because it provides a more concrete example of Cascadian capitalism — something other than a list of companies who give their money to good causes. Something like a movement.
Hanauer and Liu drew the link directly when they raved about Seattle’s Cascadian capitalist identity in a March Stranger article: “No city can match our combination of economic dynamism and civic engagement. While we have plenty of successful capitalists in Seattle, this isn’t a town…that worships the super-wealthy and believes in trickle-down economics. People here recognize…that we’re connected in an ecosystem…This ‘Cascadian’ form of capitalism works – for everyone, not just for capitalists.”
Economic pipe dreams?
Which sure sounds nice, but it remains hard to say whether Cascadian capitalism is a movement that is in fact happening. Is it just a conversation between a few powerful Seattle leaders? A rhetorical ploy that conveniently plays off the Progressive-Northwest identity to mobilize support for the middle-out cause? Just a nice idea?
When I asked Paul Guppy, Vice President for Research of the Washington Policy Center, about Cascadian capitalism, he hadn’t heard the term before – but he liked the idea.
As someone who has spent time on both coasts, Guppy agreed with the central premise that something about Seattle is different: “We have a certain culture here,” he said, “And if that means we have a certain kind of ethic about how we do capitalism, maybe that’s distinctive and that’s a good thing.”
As did Remy Trupin, executive director of the Washington State Budget & Policy Center, who agreed that “there is definitely some evidence that big capitalists are trying to think differently about capitalism here. And I think there are enough people doing that that huge change is possible.”
But Trupin hadn’t heard the term “Cascadian capitalism” either. And while most everyone I talked to — DeVore, Hanauer, Guppy, and Trupin — would agree that in its abstract, theoretical form, Cascadian capitalism is a good idea, things become more complicated when any one of them start to talk about how Cascadian capitalism would look in terms of policy.
Guppy emphasized the free market and its protection of peoples’ right to take voluntary action. To him, Cascadian capitalism might look like businesses using their money and autonomy to contribute to whatever social cause they desire. Trupin's vision, on the other hand, leans more heavily on government. He suggested that we should focus on closing tax breaks to make sure the “government has enough money to invest in better programs” like childcare and education.
A Cascadian capitalist future?
Of course, most people in the progressive Northwest like the idea that Seattle — and the region more generally — is exceptionally committed to a kind of capitalism that benefits everyone. But, idealsitic flourishes aside, will we be able to agree on what that truly entails — in govenrnent, policy, community, finance?
Towards the end of our conversation, Trupin voiced his concerns about how “deep” our Cascadian capitalist values go — if they’re there in the first place: “It makes me worry about how deeply held [this] different sense of capitalism is…it doesn’t mean that it’s not a good direction and a good movement…But when we get to real economic impacts…when push comes to shove…I’m not sure that those who are comfortable in the current paradigm will want to give that up.”
At the very least, it’s a conversation worth having. Perhaps in fleshing out our varied economic visions for the future, we'll step closer to becoming the “Cascadian capitalists” that so many seem to like the oh-so-abstract sound of.
Crosscut's Community Idea Lab coverage is made possible through the support of our educational partner, Social Innovation Fast Pitch.
Read more about: Community Idea Lab