Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Marc Vassallo and Hannah Hunthausen some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    From juvie to the streets

    Many young offenders wind up homeless after their release. The state is revamping its reentry programs to help those kids get re-established in their communities.
    Many young offenders are at risk of homelessness after their release from detention.

    Many young offenders are at risk of homelessness after their release from detention. Credit: David Locke/Flickr

    In their first year out, 26 percent of the young people released from juvenile detention facilities in Washington State wound up homeless or unstably housed. That's according to a DSHS study which followed the 962 youth discharged from the state's juvenile justice system in 2010-2011.

    Sadly, it isn't surprising that one-quarter of former juvenile offenders wind up homeless. After all, they've just spent years isolated from the only communities they knew in a place where (all too often) they’ve learned few of the life skills they'll need to be successful on the outside. But the DSHS finding is also alarming. If this trend continues, if the juvenile justice system remains a pipeline to the streets for kids who have served their time, the state will be coping with — and paying for — all the predictable, negative downstream consequences: adult homelessness, incarcerations, unemployment, chronic illness.

    The risk of long-term damage starts mounting during those critical 12 months right after discharge. According to the report, young offenders who were released without some kind of stable housing were arrested and convicted for new offenses at higher rates during that first year than the cohort who had places to stay (52-55 percent vs. 38 percent). Young offenders without stable housing options also had higher rates of substance abuse and illness that year, and were twice as likely to develop serious mental disorders or die.

    The good news is that the state recognizes the problem and is now gearing up to make sure young offenders receive better support for their return to the real world. John Clayton, assistant secretary of the DSHS Juvenile Justice & Rehabilitation Administration (JJ&RA), has issued a Reentry Initiative.

    “We are very concerned about the homelessness issue,” says Kathleen Harvey, JJ&RA administrator for reentry, transition and education. In an effort to reverse the lockup-to-streets trend, JJ&RA has just kicked off a complete overhaul of the programs it uses to prepare youth in juvenile facilities for their return to the community. Officials want those young people to leave detention with better plans for housing: not just a primary residence, but a backup option in case the primary placement falls through. As in the past, each reentry plan will also identify pathways to education, employment, job training and health care. Without these supports, says Harvey, many kids will fail to make a healthy transition to the community.

    The most important part of the new overhaul will be a fundamental change in the way JJ&RA develops new reentry plans. Instead of a comparatively top-down, staff-driven approach, the process will be more youth-driven and family-centered. In addition, and for the first time, plans will be tailored to the community each youth expects to rejoin.

    This customization is critical, says Harvey, because much about the community will have changed during the young offender's absence. The agency is launching three-month tests at different sites to identify service providers and adults from each youth’s home community who will help the young offender and his or her family develop an individualized reentry plan prior to the exit date. JJ&RA has always started planning for each youth’s future when he or she is admitted to one of its facilities, rather than waiting until the release date looms. Now, especially with state parole services so deeply cut, it’s even more critical that (as Harvey puts it) “we engage the people who are going to be in their lives long-term.”

    It makes good sense to bring caring adults from the community into these youngsters' lives. Youth in detention are cut off from the ongoing real-world practice all kids need to grow up responsible. They may learn how to live on the "inside," but not on the outside. Being able to count on supportive adults in their daily lives can help them work on growing-up skills, like resisting peer pressure and staying committed to a positive goal despite obstacles. If the justice system can marshal help from constructive adults, including family members, newly-released youngsters stand a much better chance of making a successful return.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Wed, Aug 27, 8:57 a.m. Inappropriate

    Thanks, Judy. Your comments and perspective are always insightful and help increase awareness.


    Posted Wed, Aug 27, 11:07 a.m. Inappropriate

    I heartily agree with the comment above. But what exactly does a state "initiative" mean? To me it means that at a staff meeting, a leading official says: "why don't we do.......?" The PR flaks put out an announcement, and a series of planning meetings are scheduled. Which creates an illusion of activity. Would it not be refreshing if the steps necessary to implement the initiative were outlined. Specifically that the main reason kids getting out of jail are homeless is that housing for this group does not exist. And that therefore the governor and legislature will be asked for x amount of dollars the help house our most vulnerable citizens.

    Posted Sun, Aug 31, 12:26 p.m. Inappropriate

    I agree, good article. Makes me realize what we lost when we lost families. There may not be a substitute.


    Posted Mon, Sep 1, 10:51 a.m. Inappropriate

    @keith, and the addition of so many apodments into areas that formerly were stable, middle class areas where people actually knew each other (if even by face) will continue to erode the stability that used to be Seattle.

    The war on cars is related to the war on the middle class. I don't quite understand how becoming a city of density means tossing the middle class out, but that is the message I'm seeing. Plenty of room for the wealthy, plenty of room for young people, but not room that encourages the stable living lifestyle of living in your home for decades.

    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »