Our Sponsors:
Trending Stories
- Trans-poor-tation: Olympia's $8.4 billion fail
- Trans-poor-tation 3: No high five for I-5
- Why Chris Hansen keeps fighting for a Seattle NBA team
- The Daily Troll: Pot within limits. Spokane's postal poison. Ballard bike battle brewing.
- Trans-poor-tation 2: Let's finish what we started
- The case of the vanishing seabirds
- Isn't that special: Jay Inslee unveils his top 3 budget priorities
- Why UW scientists are speeding up ocean acidification
- Book City: Tim Egan had his doubts about the Dust Bowl
- Trans-poor-tation 4: A mighty toll order
Most Commented
- Trans-poor-tation 3: No high five for I-5 (68)
- Trans-poor-tation 2: Let's finish what we started (25)
- Trans-poor-tation 4: A mighty toll order (43)
- The Mayor Games: Big transportation needs, little money (70)
- Marijuana rules: Some heavy stuff put out for public comment (15)
- Trans-poor-tation: Olympia's $8.4 billion fail (27)
- 3 ways to connect a polarized Seattle (28)
- BP greenwashes as climate dangers grow (8)
- Big energy firm still hungry after backing out of OR coal plan (4)
- Special session blues: May the best budget finagler win (1)
Follow Us »
Follow us on Twitter. |
Like us on Facebook. |
Subscribe to our RSS Feeds. |
Get our Daily Email Newsletter. |
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Bigpicture's comments
Posted Wed, Apr 20, 7:12 p.m.
I am with GaryP, bjan, and seattlelifer. DavidAnderson's cite of the CATO Institute is 15 years old. If you want to make arguement about how Amtrak drains tax dollars, get some more recent facts. As for staying on the route along the water, check out this from the the WSDOT ...
MORE