Our Sponsors:
Trending Stories
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density
- Morning Fizz: 'I'm Appalled'
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement
- Morning Fizz: She couldn't even name a Republican she'd work with
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause?
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco?
Most Commented
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density (61)
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools (47)
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement (26)
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause? (21)
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep (20)
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report (22)
- Morning Fizz: In hope of reaching a consensus (25)
- Is Washington becoming 'happy with crappy?' (16)
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle (13)
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco? (11)
Follow Us »
Follow us on Twitter. |
Like us on Facebook. |
Subscribe to our RSS Feeds. |
Get our Daily Email Newsletter. |
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Disclaimer's comments
Posted Thu, Apr 22, 11:01 p.m.
Look Lincoln, I agree with a fair number of your commentaries, but your small world view of regional planning issues comes across as a very old axe to grind. Your argument seems to be a retread of Kemper Freeman's opinions, which would have been great for his private developments but ...
MOREPosted Thu, Apr 22, 10:46 p.m.
"Thank you for you ignorant post which contains zero information or thought". Apparently over crowded traffic lanes, unreliability, inconvenience, and long range benefits are not considered concerns in your book to merit thoughtfulness. Too inconvenient to consider in the argument? I thought so.
MOREPosted Thu, Apr 22, 10:42 p.m.
Sound Transit detractors conveniently omit any discussion of reliability. Trains are designed for and have a proven record of being able to arrive frequently and precisely on time, something buses will never, never, be able to offer. I wonder how many no-show buses Mr. Vandyke has had to wait for, ...
MOREPosted Thu, Apr 22, 10:34 p.m.
Lincoln, do you really think "adding 100 express buses per hour on I-5 or SR-520 is a good idea"? Clearly you are nothing more than a peanut gallery regional transportation planner. We definitely could use fewer peanut gallery experts deciding our future.
MOREPosted Thu, Apr 22, 10:26 p.m.
Ted Van Dyke is so full of it. He's been bad mouthing regional transit for years, but I bet he hasn't a clue what it's like to have to depend on unreliable buses. Seattle was the only major city of its size without a rail system until now. Name one ...
MOREPosted Thu, Apr 22, 10:13 p.m.
Republicans are disingenuous. They would only try to claim the environmental mantle for political point, not that they have ever believed in it.. Just like the so called "compassionate conservatism", or "health forests". What they say and what they do can be polar opposites.
MOREPosted Mon, Apr 12, 11:49 p.m.
Let me get this straight. The structural integrity of the building's weakest link is a special type of paint and grout. Are we looking at a skyline of new disposable buildings that might not last twenty years?
MORE