Little_Wheedle

Active since January 2010

Skip to Little_Wheedle's comments


Little_Wheedle's comments

2010 is big year for progress on tunnel

Posted Thu, Jan 28, 8:43 p.m.

It looks to me like the people in this thread have some working knowledge of the issue. To clarify, tunnels of similar size have been built before, and with great success. The roadway tunnel in Shanghai was over 50ft diameter excavated right next to the river, and the Port of ...

MORE
Mike McGinn era: saying less, polling more, spending less

Posted Thu, Jan 28, 8:29 p.m.

Why does it constantly refer to the 'City of Seattle' as paying for the cost over-runs? Any increases will be paid for by taxes on land that fall within an 'improvement zone' that will immediately benefit from the construction of the tunnel (and demolition of the viaduct). Saying 'The City ...

MORE
Another inconvenient truth: Why McGinn is right about seawall

Posted Thu, Jan 28, 8:22 p.m.

It seems that the writer here seems to think that the tunnel can only be built after removal of the viaduct. That is not the case. The plan currently is set up to dig the tunnel while keeping the viaduct operational. Only after the tunnel is operable will the viaduct ...

MORE
Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »