Our Sponsors:
Trending Stories
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density
- Morning Fizz: 'I'm Appalled'
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause?
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco?
- Morning Fizz: She couldn't even name a Republican she'd work with
Most Commented
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density (62)
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools (47)
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement (26)
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause? (21)
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep (20)
- Morning Fizz: In hope of reaching a consensus (27)
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report (22)
- Is Washington becoming 'happy with crappy?' (16)
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle (13)
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco? (11)
Follow Us »
Follow us on Twitter. |
Like us on Facebook. |
Subscribe to our RSS Feeds. |
Get our Daily Email Newsletter. |
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Maple's comments
Posted Sat, Mar 13, 12:11 p.m.
Aggressive panhandling laws make sense to me, but to outlaw any panhandling must surely be a violation of the 1st Amendment. I don't see any way around that. We're not supposed to outlaw peaceful speech simply because it might make someone uncomfortable.
MORE