Our Sponsors:
Trending Stories
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density
- Morning Fizz: 'I'm Appalled'
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause?
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco?
- Morning Fizz: One step further
Our Members
Many thanks to
James Fallows
and
Kathleen Johnson
some of our many supporters.
ALL MEMBERS »Most Commented
- Seattle neighborhoods fight needed land use reform, density (62)
- Jolt: Parking Garages and Charter Schools (47)
- Wednesday Jolt: 'Seattle Times' wins fight against density; everybody (except Brett Phillips) wins key endorsement (26)
- Morning Fizz: $7 million committed to the charters cause? (21)
- Morning Fizz: In hope of reaching a consensus (28)
- Monday Jolt: Community Council coup and McKenna misstep (20)
- Morning Fizz: Some outstanding questions about the report (22)
- Is Washington becoming 'happy with crappy?' (16)
- Simple rules for staying sane in Seattle (13)
- Tuesday's Scan: Costco? Who says we're from Costco? (11)
Follow Us »
Follow us on Twitter. |
Like us on Facebook. |
Subscribe to our RSS Feeds. |
Get our Daily Email Newsletter. |
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
cbrewster's comments
Posted Tue, Jul 6, 9:40 p.m.
Great article. It made me realize my bike commute in Boston really isn't so bad. Also made me think it's very important when new lanes/paths are added to make a big fuss over them and get people using them before they lose their new-pavement velvety ride, so that the same ...
MOREPosted Wed, Feb 10, 9:33 a.m.
1. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are indeed dwarfed by the natural carbon cycle, but what matters is that that's a cycle that's in balance--those many gigatons (I'm not sure where you got 360) are in turn removed from the atmosphere as they have been for eons. This is not a big ...
MOREPosted Mon, Feb 8, 7:25 a.m.
This is worth 13 minutes of your day if you enjoy British humor at all and/or feel suspicious of carbon offsets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3_CYdYDDpk Kate (guilt-ridden frequent flier stuck in a long-distance relationship with my family)
MOREPosted Thu, Aug 20, 8:21 a.m.
Thank you for writing this, Tom. It makes me glad to have Crosscut around.
MOREPosted Fri, May 2, 4:19 p.m.
RE: Time for bikers to pay: Nicely put. To the questions about licensing bicyclists and accident rates, asked by a self-described twice-a-year cyclist: When you ride on a road, you have the same responsibilities a driver does. I would be happy to see police go after cyclists who ride the ...
MOREPosted Thu, Mar 27, 7:24 a.m.
Go, Barney Frank!: Of course, if this keeps up nationally, your wandering adult children will be able to live wherever they want. But I'm happy to see hypocrisy slammed!
MOREPosted Tue, Oct 2, 4:12 p.m.
RE: More at stake than polar bears and whales: Not adding to our carbon woes by extracting and then transporting (emitting CO2 all the way) all those fossil fuels DOES amount to taking a bigger picture view of things--Arctic oil exploitation is not our only alternative to Middle Eastern and ...
MOREPosted Tue, May 1, 2:11 p.m.
predicting climate vs. predicting weather: Here's how I understand the "you can't predict tomorrow's weather so how can you predict the next century's" conundrum: the LONGER the timeframe in predicting weather, the better the ratio of signal to noise. Another way to think about it is in terms of coin ...
MORE