Our Sponsors:
READ MORE »Trending Stories
- Russell Wilson's sophomore slump? Rest of NFL should be so lucky
- Why does Seattle fear urban planning?
- In defense of David Guterson
- Legislature: What's the problem just finishing its work?
- Bookstore owner & author Peter Miller: It is not a time of great books
- Tale of Two Cities: Coal, a train wreck for Burlington?
- How to ask total strangers for large sums of money
- The Daily Troll: Is WA still in Boeing's future? Lights out for Egyptian Theatre. Rebuilding obsolescence on I-5.
- Where's the science at KUOW? Why public radio wants to mix things up.
- A council misguided: The futility of property tax-financed city elections
Most Commented
- Why does Seattle fear urban planning? (57)
- A council misguided: The futility of property tax-financed city elections (24)
- Tale of Two Cities: Coal, a train wreck for Burlington? (15)
- City Council changes the rules on employee background checks (13)
- Improvements to Washington schools won't help hungry kids (13)
- Where's the science at KUOW? Why public radio wants to mix things up. (12)
- News Shmews: A journalist confronts reader apathy (14)
- Will pay-as-you-drive insurance get a chance in Washington? (20)
- In defense of David Guterson (11)
- Tale of Two Cities: Ferndale welcomes Big Coal (8)











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
jeffwright's comments
Posted Thu, Mar 5, 1:25 p.m.
I am in agreement with Mr. Kammerer's points. I maight also add two indisputable facts. First, dense development is expensive development. You cannot fine an example to the contrary. The TOD bills would gaurantee that the cost of housing will go up. Second, subsidized housing is not affordable housing. The ...
MORE