In the governor's race, Gov. Chris Gregoire understandably often cites the state's recent rating by Forbes magazine, which names Washington as the third best state for business. The magazine's annual ranking put Virginia first and Utah second; Idaho retains its high rank, this year as 7th. Oregon finished 16th, Colorado is 6th, Minnesota is 11th, Montana is 24th, California is 40th, and Alaska is 48th.
Two states are interesting examples of economic growth, Virginia and Georgia. Virginia has held the top spot for the past three years, having low regulations, strong incentive programs to lure new business, and an educated labor force from around D.C. Georgia has parlayed the Atlanta Summer Olympics, which put it on the map, into being a state attracting young professionals and drawing businesses from overseas; its airport is one of the world's busiest and Savannah is the fastest-growing port in the country.
As for Washington, the state scores well in labor supply, regulatory environment, economic climate, and growth prospects, but does less well in business costs (28th) and (oddly) quality of life (25th). Oregon does best in labor supply and growth prospects, poorly in its regulatory environment. Washington moved up from 5th last year, while Oregon vaulted from 28th. Others in the Forbes's top 10 are North Carolina, Florida, Texas, and Nebraska.
The formula for scoring high as a business-friendly state appears to be: a growing pool of educated workers, low business costs (including such things as the "tort atmosphere"), strong transportation networks, and strong prospects for growth. In two of these, labor supply and prospects for growth, Washington ranked second in the nation; Oregon was third in labor supply. Two local states showed rapid movement up the scale: Oregon and Montana.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!

Print
Email





Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Sun, Sep 7, 7:57 p.m. Inappropriate
As for quality of life, I wonder what the criteria were that ranked New Jersey #1.
Posted Mon, Sep 8, 9:56 a.m. Inappropriate
RE: in the 20s for business costs and quality of life?: I would assume that the lack of affordable housing near employment centers, and the resulting long commutes on congested highways contributed a lot to the low quality of life. It's hard to enjoy Majestic Mount Rainier or Spectacular Puget Sound when you're inching up the South Center Hill at 5 MPH on an 80 degree August Friday afternoon.